Literature DB >> 29497569

Benefits of spinal meningioma resection.

Romel Corecha Santos1, Ricardo de Amoreira Gepp1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal meningiomas account for approximately 40% of intradural extramedullary tumors. As they are usually slow growing, some patients are often diagnosed late in the clinical course when they have developed myelopathy.
METHODS: Here, we retrospectively studied a cohort of 51 patients undergoing surgery for spinal meningiomas. The median follow-up period was 45.9 months (range, 1-168 months). Assessment included evaluation of functional outcomes (e.g., comparison of the pre and postoperative status using the modified McCormick Functional Scale) and identification of prognostic factors.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients with grade IV (McCormick Scale) neurological deficits on admission underwent surgical resection; 4 of 5 grade III (McCormick Scale) and 14 patients (Grade IV) improved within 2.11 months (mean time) postoperatively. There was no surgical mortality and the morbidity rate was 16%.
CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced neurological deficits/myelopathy (Grades III or IV on the McCormick Scale) improved following surgical resection of spinal meningiomas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meningioma; rehabilitation; spinal canal; surgery

Year:  2018        PMID: 29497569      PMCID: PMC5806418          DOI: 10.4103/sni.sni_409_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol Int        ISSN: 2152-7806


INTRODUCTION

Spinal meningiomas account for approximately 40% of intradural extramedullary tumors; in fact, 90% are intradural, 5% are extradural, and 5% are both intradural/extradural. Of interest, 68% are located in the lateral spinal canal, whereas 17% are posterior and 15% are anterior. The typical ratio of female/male patients is 4:1.[8] As these are usually slow growing tumors, some patients are diagnosed late in the clinical course with significant myelopathy. Using the McCormick Rating Scale system, this study retrospectively evaluated a prospective cohort of 51 patients with spinal meningiomas, many of whom had McCormick Grade III/IV deficit, who benefited from spinal surgical intervention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study (1996–2014) involved assessment of a cohort of 51 patients undergoing spinal surgery for meningiomas. There were 40 females and 11 males, averaging 57.6 years of age. Multiple clinical and radiological (preoperative magnetic resonance) factors were assessed. In addition, patients were neurologically assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the McCormick Functional Scale [Table 1]. This study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee under an exemption of patient informed consent.
Table 1

Score systems for the evaluation of patients with spinal processesa[6]

Score systems for the evaluation of patients with spinal processesa[6]

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM-SPSS software, version 21.0. Differences between categorical variables related to the McCormick scale assessments pre and postoperatively were analyzed using the McNemar–Bowker test. Significance was assigned as a P value of less than 0.001. The observation time for the improvement of the neurological state was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meir method.

RESULTS

Clinical symptoms

Patients were symptomatic for an average of 20 months (range 3–120 months) preoperatively; 5 were classified as grade III (McCormick Scale, 9.8%) and 17 as grade IV (McCormick Scale, 33.3%). Neurological deficits reflected significant myelopathy in many of these patients: sphincter alteration in 23 patients, ataxia 12 patients, weakness 37 patients, sensory deficit 37 patients, and pain 25 patients [Table 2].
Table 2

Summary of characteristics in 51 patients with spinal meningiomas

Summary of characteristics in 51 patients with spinal meningiomas

Surgical access and degree of resection

Surgery for 23 (47.1%) patients included a laminectomy, whereas 19 patients (37.3%) underwent laminotomies. Twenty-three (45.1%) patients had Simpson Grade 2 [Table 3] resection whereas 21 patients had grade 1.
Table 3

Simpson Grading System for removal of meningiomas[1]

Simpson Grading System for removal of meningiomas[1]

Functional outcome

Fourteen patients considered McCormick Grade IV improved with surgery as did 4 of the 5 patients considered Grade III (P < 0.001). The mean time of the first functional improvement was 2.11 months (range, 1–9 months).

DISCUSSION

In this retrospective study of 51 patients with spinal meningiomas, many patients showed severe myelopathy (McCormick III: 5 patients; McCormick IV: 14 patients), and many improved after surgery [Table 4]. Some studies also showed similar benefits of surgery as in the study by Sacko et al.,[6] where patients over 70 years of age with advanced neurological deficit (grades III and IV) improved despite their Grade III (92%) or Grade IV (96%) preoperative status.
Table 4

McCormick Grade: Admission versus follow-upa,b

McCormick Grade: Admission versus follow-upa,b In this study, our patients improved within the first 3 postoperative months (mean interval, 2.11 months) [Figure 1], a finding also reported by Sacko et al.[6]
Figure 1

Probability of observing improvement as a function of elapsed time after surgery

Probability of observing improvement as a function of elapsed time after surgery In a study by Riad et al.[5] among patients with grades II and III deficits (none grade IV), functional improvement was observed after 1 year in 87% of the patients. Furthermore, 67% of the patients with original sphincter changes showed complete resolution of their deficits at 2 postoperative years. Several other studies have also shown various degrees of neurological improvement after spinal meningiomas were resected for patients with preoperative Grade II–IV status [Table 5].[1234678]
Table 5

Functional outcomes after surgery for spinal meningiomas[3]

Functional outcomes after surgery for spinal meningiomas[3]

CONCLUSION

Here, we performed a retrospective cohort study of 51 patients undergoing surgery for spinal meningiomas, many of whom were severely myelopathic in McCormick Grades III and IV. Even in those who were markedly impaired prior to surgery exhibited partial or total functional recovery following tumor resection.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Spinal meningiomas: review of 174 operated cases.

Authors:  C L Solero; M Fornari; S Giombini; G Lasio; G Oliveri; C Cimino; F Pluchino
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Spinal meningiomas: surgical management and outcome.

Authors:  Oren N Gottfried; Wayne Gluf; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Peter Kan; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Review of 36 cases of spinal cord meningioma.

Authors:  F Gezen; S Kahraman; Z Canakci; A Bedük
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Spinal cord meningioma.

Authors:  W J Levy; J Bay; D Dohn
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Spinal meningiomas in patients younger than 50 years of age: a 21-year experience.

Authors:  Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Ofer M Zikel; Cody A Koch; Bernd W Scheithauer; William E Krauss
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Management of spinal meningiomas: surgical results and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Matthias Setzer; Hartmut Vatter; Gerhard Marquardt; Volker Seifert; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 7.  Spinal meningiomas: surgical outcome and literature review.

Authors:  H Riad; S Knafo; F Segnarbieux; N Lonjon
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 1.553

8.  Spinal meningioma surgery in elderly patients with paraplegia or severe paraparesis: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Oumar Sacko; Claire Haegelen; Vivien Mendes; Adam Brenner; Musa Sesay; David Brauge; Jacques Lagarrigue; Hugues Loiseau; Franck-Emmanuel Roux
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.654

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Clinical features and prognostic factors in spinal meningioma surgery from a multicenter study.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Kei Ando; Tomohiro Matsumoto; Koji Sato; Fumihiko Kato; Tokumi Kanemura; Hisatake Yoshihara; Yoshihito Sakai; Atsuhiko Hirasawa; Hiroaki Nakashima; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Correlations between preoperative clinical factors and treatment outcome of spinal meningiomas - A retrospective study of a series of 31 cases.

Authors:  Atanas Davarski; Borislav Kitov; Georgi Apostolov; Ivo Kehayov; Rumyana Stoyanova
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-05-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.