Literature DB >> 2949672

[Comparison of fentanyl and tramadol in pain therapy with an on-demand analgesia computer in the early postoperative phase].

W Hackl, S Fitzal, F Lackner, M Weindlmayr-Goettel.   

Abstract

17 patients undergoing cholecystectomy in non-opiate general anaesthesia received tramadol (n = 7) or fentanyl (n = 10) for immediate postoperative pain relief using the on-demand analgesia computer (ODAC). Heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate were monitored at half-hourly intervals during the 6-h trial period. Arterial blood was withdrawn at hourly intervals for blood gas analyses and beta-endorphin plasma level assays. Fentanyl and tramadol serum levels were determined prior to each on-demand bolus injection during the first 2 h of the study. At the end of the trial period, the quality of analgesia was assessed retrospectively using a visual analog scale. Mean opiate consumption was 0.53 +/- 0.1 mg for fentanyl and 412 +/- 11.6 mg for tramadol, resulting in an equipotency ratio of about 1:980 (relating to body wt., consumption/h, and pain score). No correlation was found between body wt.-based opiate requirements and pain score. Heart rate increased slightly but significantly under both opiates. Fentanyl produced a significant drop in mean arterial pressure by a maximum of 16%, while tramadol left mean arterial pressure unchanged. Respiratory rate, which was elevated initially, dropped significantly in both groups. Arterial pO2 and pCO2 were within the normal range throughout the observation period, reflecting the absence of respiratory side effects. Opiate blood levels showed major inter- and intraindividual variations (minimal and maximal levels for fentanyl ranged from 0.44-3.44 ng/ml, for tramadol from 272-1,900 ng/ml) and were thus poor predictors of the quality of analgesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2949672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  10 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  C Schlünder
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  [Tramadol in acute pain].

Authors:  K A Lehmann
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  [Tolerance and safety of tramadol use. Results of international studies and data from drug surveillance].

Authors:  M Cossmann; C Kohnen; R Langford; C McCartney
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacology of tramadol.

Authors:  Stefan Grond; Armin Sablotzki
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  A risk-benefit assessment of tramadol in the management of pain.

Authors:  L Radbruch; S Grond; K A Lehmann
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Serum concentrations of tramadol enantiomers during patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  S Grond; T Meuser; H Uragg; H J Stahlberg; K A Lehmann
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of pain after major urological operations. A randomized double-blind comparison with placebo using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  K A Lehmann; C Einnolf; H J Eberlein; R Nagel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Tramadol. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in acute and chronic pain states.

Authors:  C R Lee; D McTavish; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  [Analgesia with opioids in the paediatric patient.].

Authors:  C Schlünder
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 10.  Tramadol for the management of acute pain.

Authors:  K A Lehmann
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.546

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.