Literature DB >> 29496460

Performance and precision of double digestion RAD (ddRAD) genotyping in large multiplexed datasets of marine fish species.

F Maroso1, J E J Hillen2, B G Pardo3, K Gkagkavouzis4, I Coscia5, M Hermida3, R Franch6, B Hellemans2, J Van Houdt7, B Simionati8, J B Taggart9, E E Nielsen10, G Maes11, S A Ciavaglia12, L M I Webster12, F A M Volckaert2, P Martinez3, L Bargelloni6, R Ogden13.   

Abstract

The development of Genotyping-By-Sequencing (GBS) technologies enables cost-effective analysis of large numbers of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), especially in "non-model" species. Nevertheless, as such technologies enter a mature phase, biases and errors inherent to GBS are becoming evident. Here, we evaluated the performance of double digest Restriction enzyme Associated DNA (ddRAD) sequencing in SNP genotyping studies including high number of samples. Datasets of sequence data were generated from three marine teleost species (>5500 samples, >2.5 × 1012 bases in total), using a standardized protocol. A common bioinformatics pipeline based on STACKS was established, with and without the use of a reference genome. We performed analyses throughout the production and analysis of ddRAD data in order to explore (i) the loss of information due to heterogeneous raw read number across samples; (ii) the discrepancy between expected and observed tag length and coverage; (iii) the performances of reference based vs. de novo approaches; (iv) the sources of potential genotyping errors of the library preparation/bioinformatics protocol, by comparing technical replicates. Our results showed use of a reference genome and a posteriori genotype correction improved genotyping precision. Individual read coverage was a key variable for reproducibility; variance in sequencing depth between loci in the same individual was also identified as an important factor and found to correlate to tag length. A comparison of downstream analysis carried out with ddRAD vs single SNP allele specific assay genotypes provided information about the levels of genotyping imprecision that can have a significant impact on allele frequency estimations and population assignment. The results and insights presented here will help to select and improve approaches to the analysis of large datasets based on RAD-like methodologies. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  European sea bass; GBS; Gilthead sea bream; Sequencing precision; Turbot; ddRAD

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29496460     DOI: 10.1016/j.margen.2018.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Genomics        ISSN: 1874-7787            Impact factor:   1.710


  3 in total

1.  Utilizing field collected insects for next generation sequencing: Effects of sampling, storage, and DNA extraction methods.

Authors:  Kimberly M Ballare; Nathaniel S Pope; Antonio R Castilla; Sarah Cusser; Richard P Metz; Shalene Jha
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Genome wide analysis reveals genetic divergence between Goldsinny wrasse populations.

Authors:  Eeva Jansson; Francois Besnier; Ketil Malde; Carl André; Geir Dahle; Kevin A Glover
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Genotyping-in-thousands by sequencing (GT-seq) of noninvasive faecal and degraded samples: A new panel to enable ongoing monitoring of Canadian polar bear populations.

Authors:  Kristen M Hayward; Rute B G Clemente-Carvalho; Evelyn L Jensen; Peter V C de Groot; Marsha Branigan; Markus Dyck; Christina Tschritter; Zhengxin Sun; Stephen C Lougheed
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 8.678

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.