Literature DB >> 29496382

Improving the work environment in the fluorescent lamp recycling sector by optimizing mercury elimination.

Marie-Thérèse Lecler1, François Zimmermann2, Eric Silvente2, Alain Masson2, Yves Morèle2, Aurélie Remy3, Alain Chollot2.   

Abstract

One of the main issues in the fluorescent lamp recycling sector is the mercury contamination of output fractions and occupational exposure associated with recycling operations. The aim of this study is to carry out effective mercury mass balance determinations and improve mercury recovery by finding the optimal levels for the recycling process parameters. These optimizations will allow upstream mercury emissions to be reduced, which will help to avoid mercury exposure among WEEE recycling workers. Firstly, the distribution of mercury was assessed in new and spent lamps. For new fluorescent tubes, the mean percentage of mercury in the solid phase is lower in new fluorescent tubes (19.5% with 5.5% in glass, 9.7% in end caps and 4.3% in luminescent powder) than in spent tubes (33.3% with 8.3% in glass, 12.9% in end caps and 12.1% in luminescent powder). The parametric study also shows that the finer the grains of glass, the higher the concentration of mercury (1.2 µg Hg/g for glass size particle >1000 µm and 152.0 µg Hg/g for glass size particle <100 µm); the crushing time required for the optimal removal of mercury from spent tubes is 24 h; on average 71% of the mercury is desorbed at a temperature of 400 °C. The effects of air flow rate, rotation speed and number of balls could not be determined due to wide variations in the results. It is recommended that recycling companies employ processes combining as heating and mixing techniques for the recovery of mercury from lamps in order to both (i) remove as much of the mercury as possible in vapor form and (ii) avoid adsorption of the mercury at new sites created during the crushing process.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exposure reduction; Mercury; Recycling; Spent fluorescent lamp; WEEE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29496382     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  5 in total

1.  Separation of Mercury(II) from Industrial Wastewater through Polymer Inclusion Membranes with Calix[4]pyrrole Derivative.

Authors:  Iwona Zawierucha; Anna Nowik-Zajac; Jakub Lagiewka; Grzegorz Malina
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-30

Review 2.  Effect of LED Lighting on Physical Environment and Microenvironment on In Vitro Plant Growth and Morphogenesis: The Need to Standardize Lighting Conditions and Their Description.

Authors:  Araceli Barceló-Muñoz; Marta Barceló-Muñoz; Alfonso Gago-Calderon
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-25

3.  Biological Monitoring: Evidence for Reductions in Occupational Exposure and Risk.

Authors:  Jackie Morton; Craig Sams; Elizabeth Leese; Fiona Garner; Shahwaiz Iqbal; Kate Jones
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-14

Review 4.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mercury Exposure among Populations and Environments in Contact with Electronic Waste.

Authors:  Gwen Aubrac; Ashley Bastiansz; Niladri Basu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Adsorptive removal of mercury from water by adsorbents derived from date pits.

Authors:  Mohammad A Al-Ghouti; Dana Da'ana; Mohammed Abu-Dieyeh; Majeda Khraisheh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.