Literature DB >> 29496255

Randomized phase 2 study of tivantinib plus erlotinib versus single-agent chemotherapy in previously treated KRAS mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

David E Gerber1, Mark A Socinski2, Joel W Neal3, Heather A Wakelee3, Keisuke Shirai4, Lecia V Sequist5, Rachel P Rosovsky5, Rogerio C Lilenbaum6, Bruno R Bastos6, Chao Huang7, Melissa L Johnson8, Paul J Hesketh9, Deepa S Subramaniam10, Martin F Dietrich11, Feng Chai12, Yunxia Wang12, Julia Kazakin12, Brian Schwartz12, Joan H Schiller11, Julie R Brahmer13, Ronan J Kelly13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations are identified in approximately 25% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases and are associated with resistance to currently available targeted therapies. The MET oncogene may be implicated in malignant progression of KRAS-mutant tumors. In a pre-specified subset analysis of KRAS mutant cancers in an earlier phase 2 study of erlotinib plus the oral MET inhibitor tivantinib, combination therapy was associated with substantial clinical benefit compared to erlotinib alone (progression-free survival [PFS] HR 0.18; P < 0.01). The current study was conducted to evaluate this combination further in KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Previously treated patients with advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC were randomized to receive either oral tivantinib (360 mg twice daily) plus erlotinib (150 mg daily) (ET) or single-agent chemotherapy (investigator's choice of pemetrexed, docetaxel, or gemcitabine) (C). The primary endpoint was PFS. At progression, crossover from C to ET was permitted.
RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were randomly assigned to ET (n = 51) or to C (n = 45). Median PFS was 1.7 months (mos) for ET and 4.3 mos for C (HR 1.19; 95% CI, 0.71-1.97; P = 0.50). There was no difference in overall survival (HR 1.20; 95% CI, 0.76-1.88; P = 0.44). There were 4 partial responses in the C arm, and none in the ET arm. Overall, adverse events occurred more frequently in the C arm, with more cytopenias, nausea, fatigue, and alopecia. Dermatologic toxicities were more common in the ET arm.
CONCLUSION: In previously treated patients with advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC, the combination of the MET inhibitor tivantinib and erlotinib is not superior to conventional single-agent chemotherapy.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; MET; Small molecule; Targeted therapy; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29496255      PMCID: PMC5836800          DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  41 in total

1.  Co-existence of positive MET FISH status with EGFR mutations signifies poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Aya Tanaka; Naoko Sueoka-Aragane; Tomomi Nakamura; Yuji Takeda; Masahiro Mitsuoka; Fumio Yamasaki; Shinichiro Hayashi; Eisaburo Sueoka; Shinya Kimura
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Biomarker testing and time to treatment decision in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C Lim; M S Tsao; L W Le; F A Shepherd; R Feld; R L Burkes; G Liu; S Kamel-Reid; D Hwang; J Tanguay; G da Cunha Santos; N B Leighl
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Phase I trial of a selective c-MET inhibitor ARQ 197 incorporating proof of mechanism pharmacodynamic studies.

Authors:  Timothy A Yap; David Olmos; Andre T Brunetto; Nina Tunariu; Jorge Barriuso; Ruth Riisnaes; Lorna Pope; Jeremy Clark; Andrew Futreal; Michael Germuska; David Collins; Nandita M deSouza; Martin O Leach; Ronald E Savage; Carol Waghorne; Feng Chai; Edward Garmey; Brian Schwartz; Stan B Kaye; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Preexistence and clonal selection of MET amplification in EGFR mutant NSCLC.

Authors:  Alexa B Turke; Kreshnik Zejnullahu; Yi-Long Wu; Youngchul Song; Dora Dias-Santagata; Eugene Lifshits; Luca Toschi; Andrew Rogers; Tony Mok; Lecia Sequist; Neal I Lindeman; Carly Murphy; Sara Akhavanfard; Beow Y Yeap; Yun Xiao; Marzia Capelletti; A John Iafrate; Charles Lee; James G Christensen; Jeffrey A Engelman; Pasi A Jänne
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  High affinity for farnesyltransferase and alternative prenylation contribute individually to K-Ras4B resistance to farnesyltransferase inhibitors.

Authors:  James J Fiordalisi; Ronald L Johnson; Carolyn A Weinbaum; Kaoru Sakabe; Zhui Chen; Patrick J Casey; Adrienne D Cox
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  KRAS mutations in lung cancer.

Authors:  Niki Karachaliou; Clara Mayo; Carlota Costa; Ignacio Magrí; Ana Gimenez-Capitan; Miguel Angel Molina-Vila; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Met receptor overexpression and oncogenic Ki-ras mutation cooperate to enhance tumorigenicity of colon cancer cells in vivo.

Authors:  Isolde Seiden Long; Kathy Han; Ming Li; Senji Shirasawa; Takehiko Sasazuki; Michael Johnston; Ming-Sound Tsao
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.852

8.  Tivantinib for second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.

Authors:  Armando Santoro; Lorenza Rimassa; Ivan Borbath; Bruno Daniele; Stefania Salvagni; Jean Luc Van Laethem; Hans Van Vlierberghe; Jörg Trojan; Frank T Kolligs; Alan Weiss; Steven Miles; Antonio Gasbarrini; Monica Lencioni; Luca Cicalese; Morris Sherman; Cesare Gridelli; Peter Buggisch; Guido Gerken; Roland M Schmid; Corrado Boni; Nicola Personeni; Ziad Hassoun; Giovanni Abbadessa; Brian Schwartz; Reinhard Von Roemeling; Maria E Lamar; Yinpu Chen; Camillo Porta
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  The genetics and biology of KRAS in lung cancer.

Authors:  Peter M K Westcott; Minh D To
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-02

10.  Longitudinal adverse event assessment in oncology clinical trials: the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis of Alliance trials NCCTG N9741 and 979254.

Authors:  Gita Thanarajasingam; Pamela J Atherton; Paul J Novotny; Charles L Loprinzi; Jeff A Sloan; Axel Grothey
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies.

Authors:  Ellen Cusano; Chelsea Wong; Eddy Taguedong; Marcus Vaska; Tasnima Abedin; Nancy Nixon; Safiya Karim; Patricia Tang; Daniel Y C Heng; Doreen Ezeife
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Breast Cancer CAFs: Spectrum of Phenotypes and Promising Targeting Avenues.

Authors:  Eiman Elwakeel; Andreas Weigert
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Erlotinib plus tivantinib versus erlotinib alone in patients with previously treated stage IIIb/IV non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Huan Deng; Li Wang; Xinling Chen; Shujuan Zhang; Fengming Yi; Yiping Wei; Wenxiong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  MiRNA therapeutics based on logic circuits of biological pathways.

Authors:  Valeria Boscaino; Antonino Fiannaca; Laura La Paglia; Massimo La Rosa; Riccardo Rizzo; Alfonso Urso
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.