BACKGROUND: Despite the reported harms and ethical concerns about physical restraint use in the critical care settings, nurses' intention to apply them is unequal across countries. According to the theory of planned behaviour, eliciting nurses' beliefs regarding the use of physical restraints would provide additional social information about nurses' intention to perform this practice. AIM: To explore the salient behavioural, normative and control beliefs underlying the intention of critical care nurses to use physical restraints from the theory of planned behaviour. RESEARCH DESIGN: A belief elicitation study was conducted. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Twenty-six critical care nurses were purposively sampled across gender, work-shift patterns and professional experience in five intensive care units of three hospitals in Spain. Data were obtained from a nine-item open-ended questionnaire and a focus group. Deductive content analysis was performed. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Ethical approval was obtained from the hospital ethics committee. Participants were assured their participation was voluntary. FINDINGS: Nurses framed the use of restraints as a way of prioritising patients' physical safety. They referred to contextual factors as the main reasons to justify their application. Nurses perceived that their decision is approved by other colleagues and the patients' relatives. Some nurses started advocating against their use, but felt powerless to change this unsafe practice within an unfavourable climate. Control beliefs were linked to patients' medical condition, availability of alternative solutions, analgo-sedation policies and work organisation. DISCUSSION: Safety arguments based on the surrounding work environment were discussed. CONCLUSION: Nurses' behavioural and control beliefs were related. Nurses should be trained in alternatives to physical restraint use. The impact of analgo-sedation protocols, relatives' involvement, leadership support and intensive care unit restraint policies on physical restraint practices need to be revised. Further research is required to explore why nurses do not act with moral courage to change this harmful practice.
BACKGROUND: Despite the reported harms and ethical concerns about physical restraint use in the critical care settings, nurses' intention to apply them is unequal across countries. According to the theory of planned behaviour, eliciting nurses' beliefs regarding the use of physical restraints would provide additional social information about nurses' intention to perform this practice. AIM: To explore the salient behavioural, normative and control beliefs underlying the intention of critical care nurses to use physical restraints from the theory of planned behaviour. RESEARCH DESIGN: A belief elicitation study was conducted. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Twenty-six critical care nurses were purposively sampled across gender, work-shift patterns and professional experience in five intensive care units of three hospitals in Spain. Data were obtained from a nine-item open-ended questionnaire and a focus group. Deductive content analysis was performed. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Ethical approval was obtained from the hospital ethics committee. Participants were assured their participation was voluntary. FINDINGS: Nurses framed the use of restraints as a way of prioritising patients' physical safety. They referred to contextual factors as the main reasons to justify their application. Nurses perceived that their decision is approved by other colleagues and the patients' relatives. Some nurses started advocating against their use, but felt powerless to change this unsafe practice within an unfavourable climate. Control beliefs were linked to patients' medical condition, availability of alternative solutions, analgo-sedation policies and work organisation. DISCUSSION: Safety arguments based on the surrounding work environment were discussed. CONCLUSION: Nurses' behavioural and control beliefs were related. Nurses should be trained in alternatives to physical restraint use. The impact of analgo-sedation protocols, relatives' involvement, leadership support and intensive care unit restraint policies on physical restraint practices need to be revised. Further research is required to explore why nurses do not act with moral courage to change this harmful practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
Physical restraint; attitude; intensive care; intention; nurses; qualitative research
Authors: Elisa Ambrosi; Martina Debiasi; Jessica Longhini; Lorenzo Giori; Luisa Saiani; Elisabetta Mezzalira; Federica Canzan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alvisa Palese; Jessica Longhini; Angela Businarolo; Tiziana Piccin; Giuliana Pitacco; Livia Bicego Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: María Acevedo-Nuevo; María Teresa González-Gil; María Concepción Martin-Arribas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 3.390