| Literature DB >> 29495411 |
Nguyen Thi Phuoc Van1, Liqiong Tang2, Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay3, Duc Minh Nguyen4, Faraz Hasan5.
Abstract
Vital detection on the basis of Doppler radars has drawn a great deal of attention from researchers because of its high potential for applications in biomedicine, surveillance, and finding people alive under debris during natural hazards. In this research, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the remote vital-sign detection system is investigated. On the basis of different types of noise, such as phase noise, Gaussian noise, leakage noise between the transmitting and receiving antennae, and so on, the SNR of the system has first been examined. Then the research has focused on the investigation of the detection and false alarm probabilities of the system when the transmission link between the human and the radar sensor system took the Nakagami-m channel model. The analytical model for the false alarm and the detection probabilities of the system have been derived. The proposed theoretical models for the SNR and detection probability match with the simulation and measurement results. These theoretical models have the potential to be used as good references for the hardware development of the vital-sign detection radar sensor system.Entities:
Keywords: Doppler radar; breathing signal; detection probability; finding survivors; heart beat; vital signals
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29495411 PMCID: PMC5876794 DOI: 10.3390/s18030694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1System diagram.
System parameters used for simulation.
| Symbol | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Power of transmitter | 0 dBm | |
| Transmitting antenna gain | 5 dBi | |
| Receiving antenna gain | 5 dBi | |
| Gain of the receiver | 10 dB | |
| Radiated efficiency of receiving antenna | 0.8 | |
| Radiated efficiency of transmitting antenna | 0.8 | |
|
| Reflection coefficient of the human body | 0.5 |
| RCS of the human’s chest | 500 | |
| Received noise figure | 6 dB | |
|
| Absolute noise temperature | 300 |
| High frequency | 5 Hz | |
| Low frequency | 0.1 Hz | |
| Phase noise at 1 Hz intercept | 60 dB/Hz | |
| Leakage between transmitting and receiving antennae | ||
| Path loss | 2 |
Figure 2Power of signal and noise of the system.
Figure 3Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) versus the distance from the radar system to the human body.
Figure 4Detection probabilities of the system under different threshold levels of receiver filter.
Figure 5False alarm of the system under different threshold levels of receiver filter.
Figure 6False alarm/detection probabilities of the system under Nakagami-2 channel model.
Figure 7Measurement setup to detect the breathing rate.
Respiratory rates and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) from five objects at different distances.
| Object | Breathing Rate | SNR | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ref | 1 m | 2 m | 3 m | 4 m | 1 m | 2 m | 3 m | 4 m | |||||
| Sim. | Meas. | Sim. | Meas. | Sim. | Meas. | Sim. | Meas. | ||||||
| 1 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 18 | 43.73 | 43.37 | 33.67 | 21.76 | 27.12 | 13.5 | 22.31 | 15.77 |
| 2 | 16 | 17 | 15 | 18 | 16 | ||||||||
| 3 | 16 | 18 | 18 | 19 | 17 | 43.73 | 40.11 | 33.67 | 40.44 | 27.12 | 30.65 | 22.31 | 27.08 |
| 4 | 17 | 18 | 16 | 17 | 13 | 43.73 | 66.25 | 33.67 | 43.19 | 27.12 | 24.55 | 22.31 | 19.55 |
| 5 | 16 | 18 | 16 | 17 | 16 | 43.73 | 34.09 | 33.67 | 44.56 | 27.12 | 27.12 | 22.31 | 18.65 |
| Mean | 16 | 17.4 | 16.4 | 17.8 | 16 | ||||||||
Figure 8Receiving signals in time domain.
Figure 9Receiving signals in frequency domain.
Figure 10Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the system.
Figure 11Detection capability of the system in time domain.
Figure 12Detection probability of the system at different distances.