| Literature DB >> 29495319 |
Tianjie Shao1,2, Lihuan Pan3, Zhiqing Chen4, Ruiyuan Wang5, Wenjing Li6, Qing Qin7, Yuran He8.
Abstract
Taking Yanta District in Xi'an as the research object, the present study measures the contents of Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), and Chromium (Cr) in dust samples and further assesses the health risk of heavy metals intake through dust based on the assessment method of human exposure risk proposed by U.S. EPA, with an aim to investigate the content of heavy metal in the dust of leisure squares and its exposure risk. As the results indicate, the average contents of five heavy metals are obviously higher than the soil background value in Shaanxi Province. Therefore, Cd, Ni, Cu, Pb, and Cr are obviously enriched in urban surface dust in Shaanxi Province, due to the influence of human activities. In addition, it can also be found that the non-carcinogen exposure risk in children is significantly higher than that in adults with the risk values of these five heavy metals all one order of magnitude higher than those of adults. Irrespective of whether addressing the results for children or adults, the non-carcinogen exposure doses of five heavy metals are sorted as Cr > Pb > Cu > Ni > Cd. According to the present situation, for a child, the total non-carcinogenic risk values of five heavy metals have exceeded the safety limit in 11 of the 20 leisure squares in Yanta District of Xi'an. That means the leisure squares are no longer suitable for physical and recreational activities. For the five heavy metals, the average non-carcinogenic risk value of Cr is largest, and causes the largest threat to health in Yanta District, Xi'an. The carcinogenic exposure doses of the heavy metals Cr, Cd, and Ni are very low in respiratory pathways and there is no carcinogenic health risk. In general, the Cr content in dust in domestic cities is higher than that of foreign cities; however, the Pb content is much lower.Entities:
Keywords: dust; health risk assessment; heavy metal; leisure square
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29495319 PMCID: PMC5876939 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15030394
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Sampling sites and symbolic representations.
| Number | Sampling Sites | Number | Sampling Sites |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Harmony Plaze | D11 | South Plaza of Great Wild Goose Pagoda |
| D2 | Fitness Plaza | D12 | North Plaza of Great Wild Goose Pagoda |
| D3 | Zhenguan Square | D13 | Southwest Corner Plaza |
| D4 | Sunken Plaza | D14 | Jinhong Style Garden |
| D5 | Yanxiang Plaza | D15 | Ziwei Garden Plaza |
| D6 | Chongyang Plaza | D16 | Qide Cultural Plaza |
| D7 | Zhonghe Plaza | D17 | Martyr Square |
| D8 | Kaiyuan Plaza | D18 | Mingdemen Community Plaza |
| D9 | Seasonic Square | D19 | High-tech electronic Plaza |
| D10 | Metro Square | D20 | Fountain Square in Shaanxi Normal University |
Calculation parameter values of the daily average exposure of heavy metals.
| Items | Parameters/Unit | Physics Meaning | Values | Data Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic parameters | C/mg·kg−1 | concentration of heavy metal | 95% UCL | this present study |
| Exposure behavior parameters | EF/d·a−1 | exposure frequency | 180 | [ |
| ED/a | exposure time | 6 (child), 24 (adult) | [ | |
| BW/kg | weight per capita | 15(child), 70(adult) | [ | |
| AT/d | mean exposure time | ED × 365 (non-carcinogen), 70 × 365 (carcinogen) | [ | |
| Hand-Mouth feeding | IngR/mg·d−1 | Hand-mouth feeding frequency | 200 (child), 100 (adult) | [ |
| Skin contact | ABS/non-dimensional | Skin absorption factor | 1 × 10−3 | [ |
| SA/cm2 | Surface area of skin exposure | 1150 (child), 2145 (adult) | [ | |
| SL/mg·cm−2·d−1 | Skin adhesive capacity | 0.2 (child), 0.07 (adult) | [ | |
| Inhalation | InhR/m3·d−1 | respiratory frequency | 5.71 (child), 19.02 (adult) | [ |
| PEF/m3·kg−1 | Particulate emission factor | 1.36 × 109 | [ |
Note: 95% UCL is in the 95% confidence limit of the average.
Basic statistical parameters of the mass ratio of heavy metals in dust of leisure squares in Yanta District in Xi’an (mg/kg).
| Element | Min. | Max. | Average Value | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation | Soil Background Value | Certified Value | Exceeding Standard Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | 6.56 | 13.07 | 8.68 | 1.50 | 0.17 | 0.094 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 100 |
| Ni | 25.38 | 75.90 | 42.74 | 11.63 | 0.27 | 28.80 | 31.5 ± 1.8 | 95 |
| Cu | 19.03 | 243.03 | 85.61 | 53.24 | 0.62 | 21.40 | 24.3 ± 1.2 | 95 |
| Pb | 11.08 | 588.00 | 99.29 | 144.77 | 1.46 | 21.40 | 21.0 ± 2.0 | 70 |
| Cr | 60.10 | 1297.50 | 395.57 | 289.05 | 0.73 | 62.50 | 68.0 ± 6.0 | 95 |
Figure 1Heavy metal contents in dust in leisure squares of Yanta District of Xi’an.
Exposure doses of heavy metals in the dust of urban leisure squares in different ways.
| Element | ADDing | ADDinh | ADDderm | ADDtotal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | |
| Cd | 5.71 × 10−5 | 6.11 × 10−6 | 1.20 × 10−9 | 8.55 × 10−10 | 6.56 × 10−8 | 9.18 × 10−9 | 5.71 × 10−5 | 6.12 × 10−6 |
| Ni | 2.81 × 10−4 | 3.01 × 10−5 | 5.90 × 10−9 | 4.21 × 10−9 | 3.23 × 10−7 | 4.52 × 10−8 | 2.81 × 10−4 | 3.02 × 10−5 |
| Cu | 5.63 × 10−4 | 6.03 × 10−5 | 1.18 × 10−8 | 8.43 × 10−9 | 6.47 × 10−7 | 9.06 × 10−8 | 5.64 × 10−4 | 6.04 × 10−5 |
| Pb | 6.53 × 10−4 | 6.99 × 10−5 | 1.37 × 10−8 | 9.78 × 10−9 | 7.51 × 10−7 | 1.05 × 10−7 | 6.54 × 10−4 | 7.01 × 10−5 |
| Cr | 2.60 × 10−3 | 2.79 × 10−4 | 5.46 × 10−8 | 3.90 × 10−8 | 2.99 × 10−6 | 4.18 × 10−7 | 2.60 × 10−3 | 2.79 × 10−4 |
Non-carcinogenic exposure reference doses of heavy metal in different exposure pathways in Leisure Squares of Yanta District in Xi’an (mg·kg−1·d−1).
| Population | Element | RfDing | RfDinh | RfDderm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child &adult | Cd | 1.00 × 10−3 | 1.00 × 10−3 | 1.00 × 10−5 |
| Ni | 2.00 × 10−2 | 2.06 × 10−2 | 5.40 × 10−3 | |
| Cu | 4.00 × 10−2 | 4.02 × 10−2 | 1.20 × 10−2 | |
| Pb | 3.50 × 10−3 | 3.52 × 10−3 | 5.25 × 10−4 | |
| Cr | 3.00 × 10−3 | 2.86 × 10−5 | 6.00 × 10−5 |
Non-carcinogenic exposure risk values (child) of heavy metal in different exposure pathways in Leisure Squares of Yanta District in Xi’an.
| Element | HQing | HQinh | HQderm | HI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | 5.71 × 10−2 | 1.20 × 10−6 | 6.56 × 10−3 | 6.36 × 10−2 |
| Ni | 1.40 × 10−2 | 2.86 × 10−7 | 5.98 × 10−5 | 1.41 × 10−2 |
| Cu | 1.41 × 10−2 | 2.94 × 10−7 | 5.39 × 10−5 | 1.41 × 10−2 |
| Pb | 1.87 × 10−1 | 3.89 × 10−6 | 1.43 × 10−3 | 1.88 × 10−1 |
| Cr | 8.67 × 10−1 | 1.91 × 10−3 | 4.99 × 10−2 | 9.19 × 10−1 |
| Total | 1.14 | 1.91 × 10−3 | 5.80 × 10−2 | 1.20 |
Non-carcinogenic exposure risk values (adult) of heavy metal in different exposure pathway in Leisure Squares of Yanta District in Xi’an.
| Element | HQing | HQinh | HQderm | HI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | 6.11 × 10−3 | 8.55 × 10−7 | 9.18 × 10−4 | 7.03 × 10−3 |
| Ni | 1.51 × 10−3 | 2.04 × 10−7 | 8.37 × 10−6 | 1.52 × 10−3 |
| Cu | 1.51 × 10−3 | 2.10 × 10−7 | 7.55 × 10−6 | 1.52 × 10−3 |
| Pb | 2.00 × 10−2 | 2.78 × 10−6 | 2.00 × 10−4 | 2.02 × 10−2 |
| Cr | 9.29 × 10−2 | 1.36 × 10−3 | 6.97 × 10−3 | 1.01 × 10−1 |
| Total | 1.22 × 10−1 | 1.37 × 10−3 | 8.11 × 10−3 | 1.31 × 10−1 |
Figure 2Non-carcinogenic risk value (child) of heavy metal in leisure squares of Yanta District in Xi’an.
Carcinogenic risk values of heavy metal in inhalation exposure pathway in Leisure Squares of Yanta District in Xi’an.
| Element | LADDinh | SFinh/(mg·kg−1·d−1) | Exposure Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | 2.49 × 10−9 | 6.30 | 1.57 × 10−8 |
| Ni | 1.64 × 10−9 | 0.84 | 1.38 × 10−9 |
| Cr | 7.58 × 10−7 | 42.00 | 3.18 × 10−5 |
Figure 3Comparison of the dust heavy metal contents in leisure squares of Yanta District of Xi’an with other cities.