| Literature DB >> 29494609 |
Shumaila Javeed1, Khurram Saleem Alimgeer2, Wajahat Javed2, M Atif3, Mueen Uddin4.
Abstract
Radio refractivity plays a significant role in the development and design of radio systems for attaining the best level of performance. Refractivity in the troposphere is one of the features affecting electromagnetic waves, and hence the communication system interrupts. In this work, a modified artificial neural network (ANN) based model is applied to predict the refractivity. The suggested ANN model comprises three modules: the data preparation module, the feature selection module, and the forecast module. The first module applies pre-processing to make the data compatible for the feature selection module. The second module discards irrelevant and redundant data from the input set. The third module uses ANN for prediction. The ANN model applies a sigmoid activation function and a multi-variate auto regressive model to update the weights during the training process. In this work, the refractivity is predicted and estimated based on ten years (2002-2011) of meteorological data, such as the temperature, pressure, and humidity, obtained from the Pakistan Meteorological Department (PMD), Islamabad. The refractivity is estimated using the method suggested by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The refractivity is predicted for the year 2012 using the database of the previous ten years, with the help of ANN. The ANN model is implemented in MATLAB. Next, the estimated and predicted refractivity levels are validated against each other. The predicted and actual values (PMD data) of the atmospheric parameters agree with each other well, and demonstrate the accuracy of the proposed ANN method. It was further found that all parameters have a strong relationship with refractivity, in particular the temperature and humidity. The refractivity values are higher during the rainy season owing to a strong association with the relative humidity. Therefore, it is important to properly cater the signal communication system during hot and humid weather. Based on the results, the proposed ANN method can be used to develop a refractivity database, which is highly important in a radio communication system.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29494609 PMCID: PMC5832215 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Eight binary input values.
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
Fig 1ANN based meteorological forecast.
Validation of predicted (ANN) and actual atmospheric values at 00:00 UTC for January 2012.
| Date | Actual | ANN | RE | Actual | ANN | RE | Actual | ANN | RE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 18.97 | 18.76 | 0.010 | 1020.3 | 1019.2 | 0.001 | 94.18 | 93.14 | 0.010 |
| 02 | 17.85 | 17.72 | 0.007 | 1020.5 | 1019.5 | 0.001 | 93.90 | 93.20 | 0.007 |
| 03 | 17.76 | 17.65 | 0.006 | 1021.5 | 1020.5 | 0.001 | 94.55 | 93.97 | 0.006 |
| 04 | 16.47 | 16.38 | 0.005 | 1022.3 | 1021.2 | 0.001 | 94.81 | 94.32 | 0.005 |
| 05 | 16.81 | 16.74 | 0.004 | 1020.6 | 1019.6 | 0.001 | 90.90 | 90.53 | 0.005 |
| 06 | 17.62 | 17.55 | 0.004 | 1021.6 | 1020.6 | 0.001 | 93.27 | 92.84 | 0.004 |
| 07 | 17.47 | 17.40 | 0.003 | 1021.9 | 1020.9 | 0.001 | 94.72 | 94.33 | 0.004 |
| 08 | 17.44 | 17.38 | 0.003 | 1022.6 | 1021.6 | 0.001 | 91.72 | 91.37 | 0.003 |
| 09 | 17.72 | 17.66 | 0.003 | 1021.4 | 1020.4 | 0.001 | 93.81 | 93.45 | 0.003 |
| 10 | 18.59 | 18.52 | 0.003 | 1020.7 | 1019.7 | 0.001 | 92.14 | 91.64 | 0.005 |
| 11 | 19.74 | 19.67 | 0.003 | 1021.0 | 1020.0 | 0.001 | 92.45 | 92.12 | 0.003 |
| 12 | 19.62 | 19.56 | 0.003 | 1020.2 | 1019.2 | 0.001 | 89.54 | 89.24 | 0.003 |
| 13 | 19.90 | 19.83 | 0.003 | 1019.8 | 1018.8 | 0.001 | 91.27 | 90.96 | 0.003 |
| 14 | 19.32 | 19.26 | 0.003 | 1020.0 | 1018.9 | 0.001 | 89.18 | 88.88 | 0.003 |
| 15 | 18.68 | 18.62 | 0.003 | 1018.3 | 1017.3 | 0.001 | 93.18 | 92.88 | 0.003 |
| 16 | 18.11 | 18.06 | 0.002 | 1018.8 | 1017.8 | 0.001 | 91.72 | 91.43 | 0.003 |
| 17 | 18.46 | 18.40 | 0.003 | 1017.8 | 1016.7 | 0.001 | 91.45 | 91.16 | 0.003 |
| 18 | 17.11 | 17.06 | 0.003 | 1017.9 | 1016.8 | 0.001 | 92.09 | 91.79 | 0.003 |
| 19 | 17.51 | 17.45 | 0.003 | 1019.7 | 1018.6 | 0.001 | 91.45 | 91.16 | 0.003 |
| 20 | 18.95 | 18.89 | 0.002 | 1019.9 | 1018.8 | 0.001 | 93.63 | 93.35 | 0.003 |
| 21 | 18.89 | 18.83 | 0.002 | 1020.1 | 1019.1 | 0.001 | 89.45 | 89.19 | 0.002 |
| 22 | 18.01 | 17.96 | 0.002 | 1019.1 | 1018.1 | 0.001 | 92.81 | 92.54 | 0.002 |
| 23 | 17.32 | 17.27 | 0.003 | 1018.8 | 1017.9 | 0.002 | 91.36 | 91.10 | 0.002 |
| 24 | 18.57 | 18.52 | 0.002 | 1019.7 | 1018.7 | 0.001 | 91.90 | 91.65 | 0.002 |
| 25 | 18.80 | 18.75 | 0.002 | 1018.7 | 1017.7 | 0.001 | 92.27 | 92.01 | 0.002 |
| 26 | 20.08 | 20.02 | 0.002 | 1019.5 | 1018.4 | 0.001 | 90.81 | 90.57 | 0.002 |
| 27 | 20.23 | 20.17 | 0.002 | 1018.6 | 1017.6 | 0.001 | 89.09 | 88.85 | 0.002 |
| 28 | 19.19 | 19.13 | 0.002 | 1018.1 | 1017.1 | 0.001 | 90.09 | 89.85 | 0.002 |
| 29 | 19.54 | 19.49 | 0.002 | 1019.3 | 1018.3 | 0.001 | 91.18 | 90.94 | 0.002 |
| 30 | 19.29 | 19.23 | 0.002 | 1019.5 | 1018.5 | 0.008 | 91.72 | 91.49 | 0.002 |
| 31 | 18.85 | 18.75 | 0.005 | 1019.9 | 1018.9 | 0.001 | 88.45 | 88.23 | 0.002 |
Fig 2Test problem 1: Actual and predicted (ANN) temperature values.
Validation of predicted (ANN) and actual refractivity at 00:00 UTC for January 2012.
| Date | Original Refractivity | predicted Refractivity | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 358.5966558 | 357.3032355 | 0.0036 |
| 02 | 360.1198256 | 359.0117554 | 0.0031 |
| 03 | 361.1280077 | 360.1018744 | 0.0028 |
| 04 | 363.5921161 | 362.5986368 | 0.0027 |
| 05 | 358.9210021 | 357.9507057 | 0.0027 |
| 06 | 360.1786946 | 359.2377162 | 0.0026 |
| 07 | 361.8631692 | 360.9376305 | 0.0025 |
| 08 | 359.2642328 | 358.3820866 | 0.0024 |
| 09 | 360.4683403 | 359.5742551 | 0.0024 |
| 10 | 357.2654745 | 356.3930749 | 0.0024 |
| 11 | 356.0299676 | 355.1891191 | 0.0023 |
| 12 | 353.2988769 | 352.4948633 | 0.0022 |
| 13 | 354.3691739 | 353.5564918 | 0.0022 |
| 14 | 353.3391614 | 352.5285757 | 0.0022 |
| 15 | 357.5902174 | 356.7624538 | 0.0023 |
| 16 | 357.2307459 | 356.4020746 | 0.0023 |
| 17 | 356.1661665 | 355.3428191 | 0.0023 |
| 18 | 358.8403278 | 357.9958653 | 0.0023 |
| 19 | 358.1381129 | 357.2975487 | 0.0023 |
| 20 | 358.0134116 | 357.1850137 | 0.0023 |
| 21 | 354.2832295 | 353.4926109 | 0.0022 |
| 22 | 358.4740361 | 357.6543881 | 0.0022 |
| 23 | 358.1151224 | 357.3088668 | 0.0022 |
| 24 | 356.9399129 | 356.1410981 | 0.0022 |
| 25 | 356.6639553 | 355.8651627 | 0.0022 |
| 26 | 353.5927648 | 352.8227771 | 0.0021 |
| 27 | 351.5539546 | 350.7959796 | 0.0021 |
| 28 | 353.8966248 | 353.1282681 | 0.0021 |
| 29 | 354.6855124 | 353.9132697 | 0.0021 |
| 30 | 355.6244574 | 354.8509198 | 0.0021 |
| 31 | 353.4258512 | 352.6652588 | 0.0021 |
Fig 3Test problem 1: Actual and predicted (ANN) pressure values.
Fig 4Test problem 1: Actual and predicted (ANN) humidity values.
Fig 5Test problem 1: Actual and predicted (ANN) refractivity values.
Fig 6Test problem 2: Actual and predicted (ANN) temperature values.
Fig 7Test problem 2: Actual and predicted (ANN) pressure values.
Fig 8Test problem 2: Actual and predicted (ANN) humidity values.
Fig 9Test problem 2: Actual and predicted (ANN) refractivity values.