Literature DB >> 29493821

Reach and messages of the world's largest ivory burn.

Alexander Braczkowski1,2, Matthew H Holden3, Christopher O'Bryan1, Chi-Yeung Choi3, Xiaojing Gan3, Nicholas Beesley4, Yufang Gao5, James Allan1,3, Peter Tyrrell6, Daniel Stiles7, Peadar Brehony8, Revocatus Meney1, Henry Brink9, Nao Takashina10, Ming-Ching Lin11, Hsien-Yung Lin3, Niki Rust12, Severino G Salmo13, James E M Watson1,14, Paula Kahumbu15, Martine Maron1, Hugh P Possingham3, Duan Biggs3,16,17.   

Abstract

Recent increases in ivory poaching have depressed African elephant populations. Successful enforcement has led to ivory stockpiling. Stockpile destruction is becoming increasingly popular, and most destruction has occurred in the last 5 years. Ivory destruction is intended to send a strong message against ivory consumption, both in promoting a taboo on ivory use and catalyzing policy change. However, there has been no effort to establish the distribution and extent of media reporting on ivory destruction events globally. We analyzed media coverage of the largest ivory destruction event in history (Kenya, 30 April 2016) across 11 nation states connected to ivory trade. We used an online-media crawling tool to search online media outlets and subjected 5 of the largest print newspapers (by circulation) in 5 nations of interest to content analysis. Most online news on the ivory burn came from the United States (81% of 1944 articles), whereas most of the print news articles came from Kenya (61% of 157 articles). Eighty-six to 97% of all online articles reported the burn as a positive conservation action, whereas 4-50% discussed ivory burning as having a negative impact on elephant conservation. Most articles discussed law enforcement and trade bans as effective for elephant conservation. There was more relative search interest globally in the 2016 Kenyan ivory burn than any other burn in 5 years. Ours is the first attempt to track the reach of media coverage relative to an ivory burn and provides a case study in tracking the effects of a conservation-marketing event.
© 2018 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Africa; alcance de los medios; conservation marketing; elefante; elephant; ivory burn; media reach; mercadotecnia de la conservación; quema de marfil; África; 非洲, 大象, 保护市场学, 象牙焚烧, 媒体覆盖

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29493821     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  1 in total

1.  Communicating conservation: how do the Nepalese print media portray caterpillar fungus? An analysis of newspaper coverage from 2008-2021.

Authors:  Sanjeev Poudel; Uttam Babu Shrestha; Ram Pandit; Krishna Ram Dhital
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.