Literature DB >> 29493353

A standardised pathway for the surveillance of stable vestibular schwannoma.

J Shapey1, K Barkas1, S Connor1, A Hitchings1, H Cheetham1, S Thomson1, J M U-King-Im1, R Beaney1, D Jiang1, S Barazi1, R Obholzer1, Nwm Thomas1.   

Abstract

Introduction Conservative management of patients with a stable vestibular schwannoma (VS) places a significant burden on National Health Service (NHS) resources and yet patients' surveillance management is often inconsistent. Our unit has developed a standardised pathway to guide surveillance imaging of patients with stable VS. In this article, we provide the basis for our imaging protocol by reviewing the measurement, natural history and growth patterns of VS, and we present a cost analysis of implementing the pathway both regionally and nationally. Methods Patients with an extrameatal VS measuring ≤20mm in maximal diameter receive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) six months after their index imaging, followed by three annual MRI scans, two two-year interval MRI scans, a single three-year interval MRI scan and then five-yearly MRI scans to be continued lifelong. Patients with purely intrameatal tumours follow the same protocol but the initial six-month imaging is omitted. A cost analysis of the new pathway was modelled on our unit's retrospective data for 2015 and extrapolated to reflect the cost of VS surveillance nationally. Results Based on an estimation that imaging surveillance would last approximately 25 years (+/- 10 years), the cost of implementing our regional surveillance programme would be £151,011 per year (for 99 new referrals per year) and it would cost the NHS £1,982,968 per year if implemented nationally. Conclusions A standardised surveillance pathway promotes safe practice in the conservative management of VS. The estimated cost of a national surveillance programme compares favourably with other tumour surveillance initiatives, and would enable the NHS to provide a safe and economical service to patients with VS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost analysis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Vestibular schwannoma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29493353      PMCID: PMC5930097          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  13 in total

1.  New and modified reporting systems from the consensus meeting on systems for reporting results in vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Jin Kanzaki; Mirko Tos; Mario Sanna; David A Moffat; Edwin M Monsell; Karen I Berliner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Conservative management of unilateral acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  D C Tschudi; T E Linder; U Fisch
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-09

3.  Growth of untreated vestibular schwannoma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jobin Kotakkathu Varughese; Cathrine Nansdal Breivik; Tore Wentzel-Larsen; Morten Lund-Johansen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Conservative management of vestibular schwannomas of 15 to 31 mm intracranial diameter.

Authors:  C E E Reddy; H G Lewis-Jones; M Javadpour; I Ryland; T H J Lesser
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Predictors of volumetric growth and auditory deterioration in vestibular schwannomas followed in a wait and scan policy.

Authors:  Rick van de Langenberg; Bert-J de Bondt; Patty J Nelemans; Amy J C Dohmen; Brigitta G Baumert; Robert J Stokroos
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 6.  Epidemiology and natural history of vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Sven-Eric Stangerup; Per Caye-Thomasen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Incidence of vestibular schwannoma and neurofibromatosis 2 in the North West of England over a 10-year period: higher incidence than previously thought.

Authors:  D Gareth R Evans; Anthony Moran; Andrew King; S Saeed; Nihal Gurusinghe; Richard Ramsden
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Vestibular schwannoma: role of conservative management.

Authors:  R Suryanarayanan; R T Ramsden; S R Saeed; R Aggarwal; A T King; S A Rutherford; D G Evans; J E Gillespie
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.469

9.  A protocol for the conservative management of vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Thomas P C Martin; Latha Senthil; Swarapsinh V Chavda; Richard Walsh; Richard M Irving
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Referral patterns in vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  D A Moffat; D G Hardy; R M Irving; L Viani; G J Beynon; D M Baguley
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1995-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Segmentation of vestibular schwannoma from MRI, an open annotated dataset and baseline algorithm.

Authors:  Jonathan Shapey; Aaron Kujawa; Reuben Dorent; Guotai Wang; Alexis Dimitriadis; Diana Grishchuk; Ian Paddick; Neil Kitchen; Robert Bradford; Shakeel R Saeed; Sotirios Bisdas; Sébastien Ourselin; Tom Vercauteren
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 6.444

2.  Manual segmentation versus semi-automated segmentation for quantifying vestibular schwannoma volume on MRI.

Authors:  Hari McGrath; Peichao Li; Reuben Dorent; Robert Bradford; Shakeel Saeed; Sotirios Bisdas; Sebastien Ourselin; Jonathan Shapey; Tom Vercauteren
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.924

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.