Literature DB >> 29492834

Effect of joint line preservation on mobile-type bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: finite element analysis.

Kyoung-Tak Kang1, Oh-Ryong Kwon2, Juhyun Son1, Dong-Suk Suh2, Sae Kwang Kwon2, Yong-Gon Koh3.   

Abstract

In this study, we performed a virtual mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) on the contact pressure in the tibial insert and articular cartilage by using finite element (FE) analysis to understand clinical observations and elaborate on the potential risks associated with a joint line preservation such as wear on tibial insert and osteoarthritis on other compartment. Neutral position of the knee joint was defined in 0 mm joint line, and contact pressure between tibial insert and articular cartilage varies with respect to changes of joint line. Therefore, evaluation of contact pressure may provide the degree of joint line preservation. The FE model for the joint line was developed using a perpendicular projection line from the medial tibial plateau to the anatomical axis. Seven FE models for joint lines in cases corresponding to ± 6, ± 4, ± 2, and 0 mm were modeled and analyzed in normal level walking conditions. The maximum contact pressure on the superior and inferior surfaces of the polyethylene insert increased when the joint line became positive while the maximum contact pressure on the articular cartilage increased when the joint line became negative. The increase in the maximum contact pressure in the positive joint line exceeded that in the negative joint line, and this lead to an unsymmetrical maximum contact pressure distribution with respect to the joint line from a 0 reference. The joint line elevation was sensitive to increases or decreases in maximum contact pressures in the mobile-bearing UKA. The findings of the study determined that postoperative joint line preservation is important in mobile-type bearing UKA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element analysis; Joint line; Mobile-type unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29492834     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-018-0630-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  6 in total

1.  Patellar height after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: comparison between fixed and mobile bearing.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Matteo Buda; Alessandro Nuara; Ilaria Mariani; Michele Scelsi; Federico Valli; Nicola Ursino; Michael Tobias Hirschmann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 2.  [Research progress on finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in medial knee compartmental osteoarthritis].

Authors:  Huazhang Xiong; Yi Zeng; Haibo Si; Yuangang Wu; Bin Shen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-06-15

3.  A modified technique for tibial bone sparing in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Qi-Dong Zhang; Zhao-Hui Liu; Wei-Guo Wang; Qian Zhang; Li-Ming Cheng; Wan-Shou Guo
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Anthropometry of the medial femoral condyle in the Chinese population: the morphometric analysis to design unicomparmental knee component.

Authors:  Feifan Lu; Xiaowei Sun; Weiguo Wang; Qidong Zhang; Wanshou Guo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  The Effect on the Fracture Healing following Femoral Neck Shortening after Osteoporotic Femoral Neck Fracture Treated with Internal Fixation: Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Yu; Peng-Ze Rong; Qing-Jiang Pang; Xian-Jun Chen; Lin Shi; Cheng-Hao Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Biomechanical effects of fixed-bearing femoral prostheses with different coronal positions in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pengcheng Ma; Aikeremujiang Muheremu; Siping Zhang; Qian Zheng; Wei Wang; Kan Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.