Han Jie Lee1, Alvin Lee2, Hong Hong Huang2, Weber Kam On Lau2. 1. Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore. hjielee@gmail.com. 2. Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Primary ADT (pADT) monotherapy is used significantly for patients with clinically localised disease in Asia and is acceptable even by guidelines, especially in intermediate- and high-risk disease. This occurs despite controversy in the West and data suggesting association with adverse effects, notably cardiovascular events. We therefore sought to assess the impact of pADT on all-cause mortality and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in Asian men with high-risk and unfavourable intermediate-risk PCa. METHODS: With cancer registry data, men from a single centre in Singapore with clinically localised high-risk/unfavourable intermediate-risk PCa diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 and either treated conservatively with no therapy or started on pADT within 1 year of diagnosis were followed up through January 2017. Patients with non-localised PCa (clinical stage T4, regional/distant lymph node involvement, metastases), or receipt of local therapy (radical prostatectomy/radiotherapy) were excluded. The primary outcomes of all-cause mortality and PCSM were analysed with Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty Asian men were analysed, and 177 (52.1%) were started on pADT, with mean age of 77 (49-98) years. There were 119 deaths in the cohort, and 68 (38.4%) occurred in patients treated with pADT (median follow-up, 4.4 years). After adjusting for comorbidities and clinical characteristics, pADT did not provide benefit to all-cause mortality, PCSM or cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSION: For clinically localised unfavourable intermediate-risk and high-risk PCa, starting pADT within 12 months of diagnosis is not associated with improved 5-year all-cause mortality or PCSM compared to patients treated conservatively with no therapy and should be discouraged due to lack of mortality benefit.
PURPOSE: Primary ADT (pADT) monotherapy is used significantly for patients with clinically localised disease in Asia and is acceptable even by guidelines, especially in intermediate- and high-risk disease. This occurs despite controversy in the West and data suggesting association with adverse effects, notably cardiovascular events. We therefore sought to assess the impact of pADT on all-cause mortality and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in Asian men with high-risk and unfavourable intermediate-risk PCa. METHODS: With cancer registry data, men from a single centre in Singapore with clinically localised high-risk/unfavourable intermediate-risk PCa diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 and either treated conservatively with no therapy or started on pADT within 1 year of diagnosis were followed up through January 2017. Patients with non-localised PCa (clinical stage T4, regional/distant lymph node involvement, metastases), or receipt of local therapy (radical prostatectomy/radiotherapy) were excluded. The primary outcomes of all-cause mortality and PCSM were analysed with Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty Asian men were analysed, and 177 (52.1%) were started on pADT, with mean age of 77 (49-98) years. There were 119 deaths in the cohort, and 68 (38.4%) occurred in patients treated with pADT (median follow-up, 4.4 years). After adjusting for comorbidities and clinical characteristics, pADT did not provide benefit to all-cause mortality, PCSM or cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSION: For clinically localised unfavourable intermediate-risk and high-risk PCa, starting pADT within 12 months of diagnosis is not associated with improved 5-year all-cause mortality or PCSM compared to patients treated conservatively with no therapy and should be discouraged due to lack of mortality benefit.
Entities:
Keywords:
Androgen deprivation therapy; High risk; Intermediate risk; Prostate cancer
Authors: Arnold L Potosky; Reina Haque; Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Miao Jiang; Huei-Ting Tsai; George Luta; Nancy L Keating; Matthew R Smith; Stephen K Van Den Eeden Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jesse D Sammon; Firas Abdollah; Gally Reznor; Daniel Pucheril; Toni K Choueiri; Jim C Hu; Simon P Kim; Marianne Schmid; Akshay Sood; Maxine Sun; Adam S Kibel; Paul L Nguyen; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Anthony V D'Amico; James W Denham; Juanita Crook; Ming-Hui Chen; Samuel Z Goldhaber; David S Lamb; David Joseph; Keen-Hun Tai; Shawn Malone; Charles Ludgate; Allison Steigler; Philip W Kantoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sophie Knipper; Cristina Dzyuba-Negrean; Carlotta Palumbo; Angela Pecoraro; Giuseppe Rosiello; Zhe Tian; Alberto Briganti; Fred Saad; Derya Tilki; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2019-09-21 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: R Kanesvaran; E Castro; A Wong; K Fizazi; M L K Chua; Y Zhu; H Malhotra; Y Miura; J L Lee; F L T Chong; Y-S Pu; C-C Yen; M Saad; H J Lee; H Kitamura; K Prabhash; Q Zou; G Curigliano; E Poon; S P Choo; S Peters; E Lim; T Yoshino; G Pentheroudakis Journal: ESMO Open Date: 2022-07-04