Mark Phillips1, Erik Rönnblad2, Love Lopez-Rengstig3, Eleonor Svantesson3, Anders Stålman2, Kalle Eriksson4, Olufemi R Ayeni5, Kristian Samuelsson3. 1. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. phillimr@mcmaster.ca. 2. Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stockholm South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) subscale scores at 2-year follow-up for patients with primary isolated ACL reconstruction with patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and simultaneous meniscal treatment in terms of either resection or repair in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register (SNKLR). METHODS: All ACL reconstruction patients within the SNKLR at 2-year follow-up were reviewed. The KOOS and EQ-5D subscales were assessed in four distinct patient groups: isolated ACL reconstruction, ACL reconstruction + medial meniscus resection, ACL reconstruction + lateral meniscus resection, ACL reconstruction + medial meniscus repair, and ACL reconstruction + lateral meniscus repair. The primary analysis was conducted using linear regression with isolated ACL reconstruction designated as the reference group, and was adjusted for patient age, gender, and time from injury to surgery. RESULTS: The included patients consisted of 10,001 (65.0%) individuals with an isolated ACL injury, 588 (3.8%) with ACL injury plus treated with medial meniscus repair, 2307 (15.0%) with ACL injury plus treated with medial meniscus resection, 323 (2.1%) with ACL injury plus treated with lateral meniscus repair, and 2173 (14.1%) with ACL injury plus treated with lateral meniscus resection. Meniscus resection demonstrated significantly worse results with respect to the KOOS Symptoms subscale for both the medial and lateral meniscus resection groups. Medial meniscus resection also demonstrated worse results for the KOOS quality of life (QoL) subscale, while lateral meniscus resection only approached significance. Outcomes were not different between the isolated ACL reconstruction group and the meniscus repair groups. CONCLUSION: Meniscus resection in addition to ACL reconstruction resulted in worse clinical outcomes than isolated ACL reconstruction patients; a result not seen within the meniscus repair group. This suggests that, when possible, meniscus repair may provide greater clinical outcomes over resection when treating a reparable meniscal tear that presents along with an ACL tear. Clinicians should consider and implement these findings for the management of future meniscus tear patients within their clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
PURPOSE: To compare Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) subscale scores at 2-year follow-up for patients with primary isolated ACL reconstruction with patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and simultaneous meniscal treatment in terms of either resection or repair in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register (SNKLR). METHODS: All ACL reconstruction patients within the SNKLR at 2-year follow-up were reviewed. The KOOS and EQ-5D subscales were assessed in four distinct patient groups: isolated ACL reconstruction, ACL reconstruction + medial meniscus resection, ACL reconstruction + lateral meniscus resection, ACL reconstruction + medial meniscus repair, and ACL reconstruction + lateral meniscus repair. The primary analysis was conducted using linear regression with isolated ACL reconstruction designated as the reference group, and was adjusted for patient age, gender, and time from injury to surgery. RESULTS: The included patients consisted of 10,001 (65.0%) individuals with an isolated ACL injury, 588 (3.8%) with ACL injury plus treated with medial meniscus repair, 2307 (15.0%) with ACL injury plus treated with medial meniscus resection, 323 (2.1%) with ACL injury plus treated with lateral meniscus repair, and 2173 (14.1%) with ACL injury plus treated with lateral meniscus resection. Meniscus resection demonstrated significantly worse results with respect to the KOOS Symptoms subscale for both the medial and lateral meniscus resection groups. Medial meniscus resection also demonstrated worse results for the KOOS quality of life (QoL) subscale, while lateral meniscus resection only approached significance. Outcomes were not different between the isolated ACL reconstruction group and the meniscus repair groups. CONCLUSION: Meniscus resection in addition to ACL reconstruction resulted in worse clinical outcomes than isolated ACL reconstruction patients; a result not seen within the meniscus repair group. This suggests that, when possible, meniscus repair may provide greater clinical outcomes over resection when treating a reparable meniscal tear that presents along with an ACL tear. Clinicians should consider and implement these findings for the management of future meniscus tear patients within their clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Authors: Thomas Stein; Andreas Peter Mehling; Frederic Welsch; Rüdige von Eisenhart-Rothe; Alwin Jäger Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Paul Monk; Patrick Garfjeld Roberts; Antony J R Palmer; Lee Bayliss; Reza Mafi; David Beard; Sally Hopewell; Andrew Price Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Mattias Ahldén; Kristian Samuelsson; Ninni Sernert; Magnus Forssblad; Jón Karlsson; Jüri Kartus Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Björn Barenius; Sari Ponzer; Adel Shalabi; Robert Bujak; Louise Norlén; Karl Eriksson Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Thomas B Lynch; Jeanne C Patzkowski; Erin R Swan; Christopher J Roach; Matthew R Schmitz; Jonathan F Dickens; Andrew J Sheean Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2020-10-14
Authors: Riccardo Cristiani; Christina Mikkelsen; Gunnar Edman; Magnus Forssblad; Björn Engström; Anders Stålman Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-06-22 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Theresa Diermeier; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Lars Engebretsen; Andrew D Lynch; Olufemi R Ayeni; Mark V Paterno; John W Xerogeanes; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson; Volker Musahl; Eleonor Svantesson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Thomas Rauer; Sean J Meredith Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2020-05-09 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Mehmet Erdem; Levent Bayam; Ahmet Can Erdem; Deniz Gulabi; Abdulhalim Akar; Alauddin Kochai Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2020-12-26
Authors: Erik Rönnblad; Björn Barenius; Anders Stålman; Karl Eriksson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-02-06 Impact factor: 4.342