Literature DB >> 29492368

An Excellent Clinical Outcome with Stereotactic Radiosurgery in a Geriatric Patient with Multiple and Recurrent Brain Metastases.

Bicky Thapa1, Hamid Borghei-Razavi2, Alireza M Mohammadi2, Manmeet Ahluwalia3.   

Abstract

The incidence of brain metastases range from 10 to 20% of all adult patients with cancer and lung cancer is associated with one of the highest incidences of brain metastases. In geriatric patients, who already have limited cognitive function, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) can be a problem. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a one day, outpatient treatment with minimal effect to normal brain and could particularly be useful in elderly patients. We report the case of a geriatric patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma who had multiple brain metastases and recurrences, who responded well to the stereotactic radiosurgery (six sessions) with acceptable tumor control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain metastases; cognitive; geriatric; recurrence; stereotactic radiosurgery; whole brain radiation therapy

Year:  2017        PMID: 29492368      PMCID: PMC5823486          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction

The brain metastases incidence is actually increasing as there has been an improvement in overall patient survival due to more effective systemic therapy [1-2]. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a primary modality of treatment in patient with brain metastases and has demonstrated efficacy in several randomized trials and multicenter studies, whether performed alone or in combination with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) [3-5]. SRS has been shown to be efficacious and safe for a fewer number of brain metastasis. We report an exceptional outcome in a geriatric patient with multiple brain metastases who underwent multiple courses of SRS.

Case presentation

An 81-year-old female with medical history significant for Raynaud's syndrome, hyperparathyroidism, and essential hypertension was found to have a subscapular subcutaneous lesion in July 2013, subsequently underwent excision and pathology was reported as a metastatic adenocarcinoma with focal neuroendocrine features in the lesion; molecular marker like epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was negative for mutation and there was no anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion. Computed tomography (CT) chest performed in Aug 2013 revealed a 10 x 18 mm right lower lobe and a separate 10 mm right lower lobe nodule with multiple sub-5 mm nodules throughout both lungs. Positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) confirmed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity in the right lower lobe as well as three FDG avid pleural lesions and a destructive third lumbar vertebral (L3) lesion. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain (Figure 1) showed a very small lesion in left temporal region for which she underwent SRS.
Figure 1

MRI scan of the brain from the brain lab, (A) at the time of the diagnosis or before SRS and (B) after SRS.

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; SRS: Stereotactic radiosurgery.

MRI scan of the brain from the brain lab, (A) at the time of the diagnosis or before SRS and (B) after SRS.

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; SRS: Stereotactic radiosurgery. She received carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in October 2013 for systemic disease with excellent initial response. Follow-up MRI of the brain in August 2014 and repeat in October 2014 (Figure 2) demonstrated new multiple brain metastases in left frontal and parietal region for which she underwent SRS in October 2014.
Figure 2

Follow-up MRI of the brain showing new punctate enhancement in the left frontal and parietal region.

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.

Follow-up MRI of the brain showing new punctate enhancement in the left frontal and parietal region.

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging. The patient was continued on maintenance pemetrexed until March 2015 and was changed to single-agent paclitaxel for systemic disease. However, paclitaxel failed to control the systemic disease and patient had progression of the systemic disease as well as new multiple brain metastases. In view of the systemic disease progression, the patient was initiated on Nivolumab in June 2015 and had stereotactic radiosurgery in August 2015. However, CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis with contrast in March 21, 2016 demonstrated stable disease. In May 2016 repeat MRI (Figure 3) demonstrated new brain metastases in right parietal region, left precuneus and she again underwent SRS, although CT scans of abdomen and lung on July 2016 again showed stable disease.
Figure 3

MRI brain with new metastases highlighted by arrows.

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.

MRI brain with new metastases highlighted by arrows.

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging. MRI brain in July 2016 again revealed new right occipital lesion for which she underwent SRS on July 16. Follow-up MRI brain in September 2016 (Figure 4) revealed two new metastases in right frontal region for which the patient again had SRS.
Figure 4

Follow-up MRI brain with new metastases and old lesion.

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.

Follow-up MRI brain with new metastases and old lesion.

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging. There was no neurological deficit since the diagnosis of the brain metastases and patient tolerated the SRS treatment fairly well with good quality of the life and with no impairment in neurocognitive function. The patient has been doing well with stable systemic disease and good performance status with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0. There were a total of 12 metastatic lesions identified and treated over three years. They varied in linear size from  3 mm to 12 mm. The characteristics of the brain metastases in the form of target volume, location of the brain metastases and linear size along with radiation doses have been summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Details of brain metastases and radiation dose.

SRS: Stereotactic radiosurgery.

Date of SRS No. of lesions Location of the lesions Target volume Maximum linear size Dose of radiation
9/26/2013 1 Lt Temporal 0.191 cc 0.8 cm 24 Gy to the 51% local isodose line
10/2/2014 4 Lt Superior frontal 0.015 cc 0.3 cm 24 Gy to the 83% local isodose line
    Lt Parietal 0.071 cc 0.4 cm 24 Gy to the 84% local isodose line
    Lt Anterior frontal 0.047 cc 0.4 cm 24 Gy to the 79% local isodose line
    Lt Mesial frontal 0.071 cc 0.6 cm 24 Gy to the 79% local isodose line
8/10/2015 3 Lt lateral frontal 0.0174 cc 0.3 cm 24 Gy to the 74% local isodose line
    Rt Parietal 0.1989 cc 0.75 cm 24 Gy to the 77% local isodose line
    Lt Occipital 0.642 cc 1.2 cm 24 Gy to the 81% local isodose line
5/27/2016 1 Rt Lateral parietal 0.275 cc 0.9 cm 24 Gy to the 62% local isodose line
7/15/2016 1 Rt Posterior Occipital 0.088 cc 0.6 cm 24 Gy to the 89% local isodose line
9/1/2016 2 Rt Superior frontal 0.05 cc 0.5 cm 24 Gy to the 53% local isodose line
    Rt Lateral frontal 0.111 cc 0.6 cm 24 Gy to the 86% local isodose line

Details of brain metastases and radiation dose.

SRS: Stereotactic radiosurgery.

Discussion

Treatment for brain metastases is challenging and the outcome depends on various factors such as the age of the patient, performance status and the number of metastases, mass affect, tumor location and neurological deficit. Extracranial metastasis and systemic disease control have been a major determinant of the overall survival of the patient with brain metastasis. Historically, WBRT has been the standard of care for patients with multiple brain metastases but it has also been associated with neuro-cognitive effect [6-7]. SRS has demonstrated efficacy in several randomized trials and multicenter studies, whether performed alone or in combination with WBRT. Recently, SRS has been emerged as the preferred modality of treatment for the patient with multiple brain metastases [8]. SRS has also progressively gained favor because of its minimal impact on the delivery of systemic treatment options and it may also have synergistic effect with novel immunotherapy agents. Our patient had multiple recurrence of brain metastases since the diagnosis and underwent a total of six courses of SRS within a span of four years. Except for patient’s age (>75 years), she had fairly well controlled systemic disease, good performance status, and no neurological deficit. The patient’s multiple recurrence of the brain metastases has been well controlled with stereotactic radio-surgery with good clinical outcome. In total she received local intracranial treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery for 12 lesions with no neurological deficit. The rates of local control have been equivalent between SRS and WBRT but SRS alone has been found to have higher rates of recurrence after treatment as compared to WBRT because SRS only treats the lesion visible on MRI while WBRT also treats microscopic level metastatic disease [9]. Furthermore, overall survival is similar between WBRT and SRS versus SRS alone in randomized studies [9]. Recent studies in patients with brain metastasis have also demonstrated tumor volume as the prognostic factor to predict the clinical outcome [10].

Conclusions

Stereotactic radiosurgery is a very effective modality of treatment for recurrent and multiple brain metastases depending on the prognostic factors of the patient. Minimal cognitive decline compared with WBRT makes SRS favorable for geriatric patients with limited cognitive capacity. However, more studies are necessary on multiple SRS courses in recurrent brain metastases to determine the neuro-cognitive effect and overall outcome of the patients.
  10 in total

1.  Intracranial control and radiographic changes with adjuvant radiation therapy for resected brain metastases: whole brain radiotherapy versus stereotactic radiosurgery alone.

Authors:  Kirtesh R Patel; Roshan S Prabhu; Shravan Kandula; Daniel E Oliver; Sungjin Kim; Constantinos Hadjipanayis; Jeffery J Olson; Nelson Oyesiku; Walter J Curran; Mohammad K Khan; Hui-Kuo Shu; Ian Crocker
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  The Prognostic Role of Tumor Volume in the Outcome of Patients with Single Brain Metastasis After Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Authors:  E Emily Bennett; Lilyana Angelov; Michael A Vogelbaum; Gene H Barnett; Samuel T Chao; Erin S Murphy; Jennifer S Yu; John H Suh; Xuefei Jia; Glen H J Stevens; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Alireza M Mohammadi
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis, stratified by the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis method.

Authors:  S N Sanghavi; S S Miranpuri; R Chappell; J M Buatti; P K Sneed; J H Suh; W F Regine; E Weltman; V J King; S J Goetsch; J C Breneman; P W Sperduto; C Scott; S Mabanta; M P Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Targeted Treatment of Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Nicole Shonka; Vyshak Alva Venur; Manmeet S Ahluwalia
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Impact of 2-staged stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases ≥ 2 cm.

Authors:  Lilyana Angelov; Alireza M Mohammadi; Elizabeth E Bennett; Mahmoud Abbassy; Paul Elson; Samuel T Chao; Joshua S Montgomery; Ghaith Habboub; Michael A Vogelbaum; John H Suh; Erin S Murphy; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Sean J Nagel; Gene H Barnett
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Single brain metastasis: radiosurgery alone compared with radiosurgery plus up-front whole-brain radiotherapy.

Authors:  Dirk Rades; Dagmar Hornung; Theo Veninga; Steven E Schild; Jan Gliemroth
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Treatment of Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Xuling Lin; Lisa M DeAngelis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Paul D Brown; Kurt Jaeckle; Karla V Ballman; Elana Farace; Jane H Cerhan; S Keith Anderson; Xiomara W Carrero; Fred G Barker; Richard Deming; Stuart H Burri; Cynthia Ménard; Caroline Chung; Volker W Stieber; Bruce E Pollock; Evanthia Galanis; Jan C Buckner; Anthony L Asher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial.

Authors:  David W Andrews; Charles B Scott; Paul W Sperduto; Adam E Flanders; Laurie E Gaspar; Michael C Schell; Maria Werner-Wasik; William Demas; Janice Ryu; Jean-Paul Bahary; Luis Souhami; Marvin Rotman; Minesh P Mehta; Walter J Curran
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-22       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study.

Authors:  Masaaki Yamamoto; Toru Serizawa; Takashi Shuto; Atsuya Akabane; Yoshinori Higuchi; Jun Kawagishi; Kazuhiro Yamanaka; Yasunori Sato; Hidefumi Jokura; Shoji Yomo; Osamu Nagano; Hiroyuki Kenai; Akihito Moriki; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshihisa Kida; Yoshiyasu Iwai; Motohiro Hayashi; Hiroaki Onishi; Masazumi Gondo; Mitsuya Sato; Tomohide Akimitsu; Kenji Kubo; Yasuhiro Kikuchi; Toru Shibasaki; Tomoaki Goto; Masami Takanashi; Yoshimasa Mori; Kintomo Takakura; Naokatsu Saeki; Etsuo Kunieda; Hidefumi Aoyama; Suketaka Momoshima; Kazuhiro Tsuchiya
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 41.316

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.