| Literature DB >> 29492199 |
Bram De Wilde1,2, Anneleen Beckers1, Sven Lindner3, Althoff Kristina3, Katleen De Preter1,2, Pauline Depuydt1,2, Pieter Mestdagh1,2, Tom Sante1, Steve Lefever1,2, Falk Hertwig4,5, Zhiyu Peng6, Le-Ming Shi7, Sangkyun Lee8, Elien Vandermarliere9,10, Lennart Martens9,10, Björn Menten1, Alexander Schramm3, Matthias Fischer4,5, Johannes Schulte11, Jo Vandesompele1,2, Frank Speleman1,2.
Abstract
Genetically engineered mouse models have proven to be essential tools for unraveling fundamental aspects of cancer biology and for testing novel therapeutic strategies. To optimally serve these goals, it is essential that the mouse model faithfully recapitulates the human disease. Recently, novel mouse models for neuroblastoma have been developed. Here, we report on the further genomic characterization through exome sequencing and DNA copy number analysis of four of the currently available murine neuroblastoma model systems (ALK, Th-MYCN, Dbh-MYCN and Lin28b). The murine tumors revealed a low number of genomic alterations - in keeping with human neuroblastoma - and a positive correlation of the number of genetic lesions with the time to onset of tumor formation was observed. Gene copy number alterations are the hallmark of both murine and human disease and frequently affect syntenic genomic regions. Despite low mutational load, the genes mutated in murine disease were found to be enriched for genes mutated in human disease. Taken together, our study further supports the validity of the tested mouse models for mechanistic and preclinical studies of human neuroblastoma.Entities:
Keywords: array CGH; exome sequencing; mouse model; neuroblastoma
Year: 2017 PMID: 29492199 PMCID: PMC5823580 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Genomic alterations in murine tumors
| Array CGH | Somatic exome sequencing | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample id | Mouse id | Model | Age of tumor onset | Status | Whole chromosome alterations | Segmental alterations | Number of focal alterations- | number of mutations | number of consequence mutations |
| 4 | 4 | ALK | 136 | whole chromosome | 9 (+3;-4;-5;-6;-8;-9;+13;-15;-X) | - | - | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 3 | ALK | 148 | segmental | 4 (+3;+7;+10;-X) | 1 (+11q) | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| 1 | 1 | ALK | 130 | segmental | 2 (+12;-X) | 1 (+11q) | 3 | 11 | 3 |
| 5 | 5 | ALK | 130 | segmental | 11 (+3;-4;-5;-8;-9;-13;-14;-15;-18;-19;-X) | 1 (-12q) | - | 4 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | ALK | 197 | focal | 2 (+3;+12) | - | 2 (including MYCN) | - | - |
| 11 | 7 | LSL-Lin28b | 56 | whole chromosome | 1 (+3) | - | - | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | 7 | LSL-Lin28b | 56 | whole chromosome | 3 (+3;+7;+10) | - | - | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 7 | LSL-Lin28b | 56 | whole chromosome | 1 (+3) | 1 (+11q) | - | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 6 | LSL-Lin28b | 56 | segmental | 1 (+3) | 1 (-14q) | - | 1 | 1 |
| 7 | 6 | LSL-Lin28b | 56 | segmental | 1 (+3) | 1 (-14q) | - | 1 | 1 |
| 6 | 6 | LSL-Lin28b | 56 | segmental | 1 (+3) | 1 (+11q) | - | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | 8 | LSL-NMYC | 89 | segmental | 1 (+3) | 1 (+16p) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | 9 | LSL-NMYC | 46 | focal | - | - | 6 ( all on chromosome 7) | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 9 | LSL-NMYC | 46 | focal | - | - | 5 (4 on chromosome 7) | 24 | 10 |
| 15 | 10 | LSL-NMYC | 100 | whole chromosome | 2 (+3;+6) | - | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 10 | LSL-NMYC | 100 | whole chromosome | 2 (+3;+6) | - | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 18 | 12 | LSL-NMYC | 88 | whole chromosome | 3 (+3;+6;+12) | - | - | 8 | 1 |
| 17 | 11 | LSL-NMYC | 88 | segmental | 1 (+3) | 1 (+11q) | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 18 | TH-MYCN | 86 | flat | - | - | 0 (skint gene locus) | 6 | 3 |
| 20 | 14 | TH-MYCN | 129 | whole chromosome | 1 (+3) | - | 0 (skint gene locus) | 16 | 6 |
| 23 | 17 | TH-MYCN | 65 | flat | - | - | 0 (skint gene locus) | 6 | 2 |
| 19 | 13 | TH-MYCN | 123 | whole chromosome | 1 (+3) | - | 0 (skint gene locus) | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 19 | TH-MYCN | 82 | flat | - | - | 0 (skint gene locus) | 3 | 0 |
| 21 | 15 | TH-MYCN | 67 | flat | - | - | 0 (skint gene locus) | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 16 | TH-MYCN | 95 | whole chromosome | 2 (+3;-14) | - | 2 (+ skint gene locus) | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 21 | TH-MYCN | 80 | focal | - | - | 0 (skint gene locus) | 1 | 1 |
| 26 | 20 | TH-MYCN | 126 | focal | 1 (+3) | - | 3 (+ skint gene locus) | 3 | 1 |
| 28 | 22 | TH-MYCN-ALK | 25 | focal | - | - | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| 29 | 23 | TH-MYCN-ALK | 41 | flat | - | - | - | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 26 | TH-MYCN-ALK | 29 | flat | - | - | - | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 25 | TH-MYCN-ALK | 29 | flat | - | - | - | 3 | 1 |
| 33 | 27 | TH-MYCN-ALK | 22 | flat | - | - | - | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 28 | TH-MYCN-ALK | 22 | flat | - | - | - | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 29 | TH-MYCN-ALK | 33 | whole chromosome | 1 (+10) | - | - | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 30 | TH-MYCN-ALK | 33 | flat | - | - | - | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 24 | TH-MYCN-ALK | 32 | flat | - | - | - | 0 | 0 |
The genomic alterations found in the murine tumors divided up into array CGH and exome sequencing results. Array CGH profiles where evaluated as having whole chromosomal copy number changes, segmental (large chromosomal sections) or focal alterations. For the chromosomal and segmental alterations, we indicate the chromosome or region altered, a + means a gain while a – indicates a loss of chromosomal material. For the focal alterations, we list the number of alterations found. In the exome sequencing columns, we list the total number of mutations and the number of mutations predicted to have a consequence at the protein level.
Figure 1Murine tumor kayo views: DNA copy number profiles of murine tumor samples
Gains are indicated in blue, losses in red (A. ALK F1174L, B. Lin28b, C. LSL-MYCN, D. Th-MYCN E. ALK F1174L/MYCN).
Figure 2Number of genomic alterations per tumor correlates with tumor age of onset
The number of somatic murine genomic alterations plotted against the age of the mouse at tumor onset showing a positive correlation. This correlation is also observed in human tumors [9]. The correlation is not strong but highly significant as indicated by the Spearman’s rank correlation rho and p values.
C: overlapping mutated genes
| Murine gene name | Ensembl murine gene ID | Relation | Human gene name | Ensembl Human gene id | Consequence in murine model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dicer1 | ENSMUSG00000041415 | ortholog_one2one | DICER1 | ENSG00000100697 | missense |
| Zfp574 | ENSMUSG00000045252 | ortholog_one2one | ZNF574 | ENSG00000105732 | missense |
| Ptch1 | ENSMUSG00000021466 | ortholog_one2one | PTCH1 | ENSG00000185920 | missense |
We explored enrichment of the mutations found in murine tumors for genes known to be mutated in human neuroblastoma. From Table 2A we can see the number of overlapping genes (3) to not be enriched (0.0865 Fisher’s exact test) for genes mutated in human neuroblastoma 883 for a total of 25 genes showing mutations in the murine tumors. If we restrict this analysis to the MYCN driven tumors we do achieve significance (0.0278 Fisher’s exact test) as 3 out of 16 genes mutated in murine tumors show overlap with the genes mutated in human neuroblastoma. In Table 2B we show the murine and human name and ids for the genes showing mutations in both murine and human tumors.
A: for all murine tumors
| Murine | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| non-synonymous mutations | not mutated | total | ||
| non-synonymous mutations | 3 | 880 | 883 | |
| not mutated | 22 | 20021 | 20043 | |
| total | 25 | 20901 | 20926 | |
B: for MYCN driven tumors
| Murine | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| non-synonymous mutations | not mutated | total | ||
| non-synonymous mutations | 3 | 880 | 883 | |
| not mutated | 13 | 20030 | 20043 | |
| total | 16 | 20910 | 20926 | |
Figure 3Bi allelic Dicer1 mutation
Bi-allelic Dicer1 mutation A. IGV view of DICER1 mutated residues in tumour case 20: all but one read (with multiple mismatches and low mapping quality) show only one mismatch which indicates a bi allelic mutation in this tumor. B. mutated residues which are shown as sticks (in blue) are located at the surface of the protein, and bind together with Glu1699, Asp1703 and Asp1707 Mg (red balls). PDB-entry 3C4B [58] is shown in blue, PDB-entry 2EB1 [60] is shown in yellow.