John G Swallow1, Andrew N Bubak1,2, Jaime L Grace3. 1. Department of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver CO, USA. 2. Neuroscience Program, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora CO, USA, and. 3. Department of Biology, Bradley University, Peoria IL, USA.
Understanding the mechanisms underlying complex behaviors requires a comprehensive
investigation of the neurobiological factors that regulate and modulate their expression.
Monoamines, such as serotonin, dopamine, and noradrenaline, serve a variety of essential
physiological roles in modulating animal behavior. Furthermore, the evolutionary
conservation of these aminergic systems spans across both vertebrates and invertebrates,
having comparable effects in such diverse processes as learning and memory, aggression,
mating behaviors and reproduction, stress responses, locomotion, and collective social
behaviors (Dishman 1997; Libersat and Pflueger 2004; Kamhi and Traniello 2013; Bubak et al.
2014a; De Boer et al. 2015).
Outstanding research is currently being conducted in this field, uncovering remarkable
similarities in neural circuitries even among highly divergent taxa, such as
Drosophila and humans. Investigating the neural mechanisms involved in
the monoaminergic modulation of behavior across a variety of taxonomically distant species
can provide researchers with a better understanding of the origins and functions of these
systems. The goal of this special issue is to provide a venue in which colleagues studying
similar questions across highly divergent animal systems can present their recent and
groundbreaking work in this exciting area of biology. We hope this collection of papers will
encourage and stimulate a dialogue on the similarities of monoaminergic function in a wide
variety of animals and ultimately promote future comparative approaches when investigating
behavioral modulation.
Current Research Integrating Monoamines and Behavior
In this issue, we aim to highlight a range of animal models systems to illustrate the
central role that monoamines play in modulating various behaviors. This special column
features seven contributions drawn from the participants in a symposium we organized for the
9th International Congress of Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry, held in Krakow,
Poland, in August 2015. Featured animal models include both invertebrates and
vertebrates.
Synthesis, new directions, and reviews
The issue starts with a synthetic contribution by Bubak et al. (2016), who use a well-established model system for aggression,
stalk-eyed flies (Bubak et al. 2014a), to
investigate the role of monoamines in assessing opponent resource-holding potential in
aggressive interactions. Using large, published data sets (Egge and Swallow 2011; Egge
et al. 2011; Bubak et al. 2014b),
they aim to distinguish between two commonly used models of assessment strategies,
self-determined persistence and mutual rival assessment, as described by Taylor and Elwood (2003). Bubak et al. (2016) clearly demonstrate that assessment
strategies, decisions regarding whether to escalate aggression or retreat, and contest
outcome are better predicted when behavioral and neurophysiological measurements are
incorporated alongside morphological indices of resource-holding potential.Eusocial insects, including ants, self-organize to solve complex problems, and biogenic
amines play a significant role in the neuromodulation of social behaviors (Kamhi and Traniello 2013). In the second
conceptual piece of this issue, Hoover et al.
(2016) develop an individual agent-based model that illustrates how individual
changes in brain concentrations of the biogenic aminesserotonin and octopamine, coupled
with a simple inherent decision rule, can explain the escalation of individual aggressive
acts to colony wide warfare. This model makes specific predictions about the proximate
neurochemical mechanisms underlying the process leading to a collective decision and
escalation to war. This approach has the potential to inform and direct specific
mechanistic studies that examine how individual decisions can lead to complex,
self-organized behaviors.The issue ends with a comprehensive synthetic review of the role of serotonin in
modulating fish behavior (Winberg and Thornqvist
2016). Specifically, the authors describe how the brain serotonergic system is
involved in phenotypic plasticity and how different environmental factors shape the
behavior of an individual under this context. In one example, the authors describe
divergent stress coping styles (proactive vs. reactive) observed within teleost fish as
well as other vertebrates. The stark contrast between the two behavioral phenotypes seems
to be modulated in part by serotonergic mechanisms. The reactive fish, typically found to
be shy and less aggressive, have elevated synthesis and metabolism of serotonin following
stress, whereas the more dominant and routine-prone proactive fish do not. Investigating
the underlying monoaminergic mechanisms that mediate behavioral syndromes will provide
great insight into this field.
Empirical studies of the role of monoamines in complex behaviors
Stevenson and Rillich (2016) provide a nice
synopsis of their proliferative work investigating the roles of biogenic amines and nitric
oxide in cricket aggression. In a series of convincing studies, Stevenson and colleagues
specifically uncover the role of the insect analogue to noradrenaline, octopamine, on the
adaptive decision to fight or flee. Using pharmacology, the authors discovered that
octopamine could be considered the motivational component of aggression, demonstrating a
necessary role for the biogenic amine in resource possession-inducing aggression. At the
opposite behavioral response, Stevenson and colleagues convincingly demonstrated a
suppressing, flee-promoting role for nitric oxide as well as its role in the loser
effect.In another evolutionarily important behavior, Panaitof et al. (2016) provide novel insight into the neuromodulation of
biparental care for offspring in the burying beetle Nicrophorus
orbicollis. This remarkable behavior is characterized by a synchronous shift in
male and female behavior, coordinating effective care for their offspring by burying a
small animal carcass as food for their larvae as well as other demanding parental
activities. The authors investigated the role of several monoamines including serotonin,
octopamine, and dopamine during this reproductive stage. They provide novel evidence for
the role of dopamine in the modulation of burying beetle parental behavior, showing a
sharp increase in levels following 24 h of care. Interestingly, whole brain levels of
serotonin and octopamine were unaltered compared with nonbreeding pairs.The health benefits of regular exercise, as well as the contrary deleterious effects of a
sedentary lifestyle, are well documented. These effects are known to impact the nervous
system and seem to be conserved across vertebrate species. In terms of neurophysiology,
the monoaminesserotonin and noradrenaline have been extensively studied for their
anxiolytic and anti-depressive effects following exercise. Nicastro and Greenwood (2016) effectively and succinctly review
this information while also discussing current limitations in research and future
strategies. Additionally, the authors provide a novel hypothesis regarding the mechanisms
of the emotional effects of exercise via the activation of a subset of
temperature-sensitive serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus.Jaromin et al. (2016) investigated the role
of dopamine and noradrenaline on exercise performance. Specifically, the authors studied
the underlying motivational mechanisms associated with increases in aerobic exercise
performance. The authors artificially selected a population of bank voles to create
selected lines of individuals with a high swim-induced aerobic metabolism, which achieved
significantly higher metabolism than unselected lines. While successfully demonstrating
baseline differences in aerobic exercise performance from the 2 selected lines, the
authors did not see a conclusive difference in exercise performance following
administration of the dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, bupropion. One
possible explanation the authors raise for this lack of response could be the animal’s
ability to cope with stress. For example, the selection experiment could have acted on the
individual’s stress response rather than on motivation. Nonetheless, the authors provide
important insight into inconsistencies seen among different animal models. This provides
an example of the significance of investigating behavior and its underlying
neurophysiological mechanisms in a variety of animal species that may experience various
evolutionary selection pressures.
Summary
The contributions to this special issue demonstrate the essential roles of monoamines in
modulating animal behavior as well as the deep evolutionary conservation shared among taxa
as diverse as humans and insects. Taken together, this collection of papers introduces the
complexity of such studies and the importance of continued research. While much is known
about the general role of specific monoamines and their subsequent behavioral outputs, the
more proximate mechanisms, such as the underlying genetic basis and receptor subtype
functions, remain less understood. We anticipate that the empirical studies as well as the
synthesis articles in this collection of work will stimulate new ideas and approaches to
investigate the essential underlying monoaminergic mechanisms mediating complex
behaviors.
Authors: Brenna M G Gormally; Kaelyn Bridgette; Aubrey Emmi; Delilah Schuerman; Patricia C Lopes Journal: R Soc Open Sci Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 3.653
Authors: Siri H Helland-Riise; Marco A Vindas; Ida B Johansen; Lauren E Nadler; Kelly L Weinersmith; Ryan F Hechinger; Øyvind Øverli Journal: Biol Open Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 2.422
Authors: Fredrik R Staven; Manuel Gesto; Martin H Iversen; Per Andersen; Deepti M Patel; Jarle T Nordeide; Torstein Kristensen Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 4.566