| Literature DB >> 29491875 |
Rebecca G Stevens1, Pierre Baldet2, Jean-Paul Bouchet1, Mathilde Causse1, Catherine Deborde2,3, Claire Deschodt1, Mireille Faurobert1, Cécile Garchery1, Virginie Garcia2, Hélène Gautier4, Barbara Gouble5, Mickaël Maucourt2,3, Annick Moing2,3, David Page5, Johann Petit2, Jean-Luc Poëssel1, Vincent Truffault1, Christophe Rothan2.
Abstract
Changing the balance between ascorbate, monodehydroascorbate, and dehydroascorbate in plant cells by manipulating the activity of enzymes involved in ascorbate synthesis or recycling of oxidized and reduced forms leads to multiple phenotypes. A systems biology approach including network analysis of the transcriptome, proteome and metabolites of RNAi lines for ascorbate oxidase, monodehydroascorbate reductase and galactonolactone dehydrogenase has been carried out in orange fruit pericarp of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). The transcriptome of the RNAi ascorbate oxidase lines is inversed compared to the monodehydroascorbate reductase and galactonolactone dehydrogenase lines. Differentially expressed genes are involved in ribosome biogenesis and translation. This transcriptome inversion is also seen in response to different stresses in Arabidopsis. The transcriptome response is not well correlated with the proteome which, with the metabolites, are correlated to the activity of the ascorbate redox enzymes-ascorbate oxidase and monodehydroascorbate reductase. Differentially accumulated proteins include metacaspase, protein disulphide isomerase, chaperone DnaK and carbonic anhydrase and the metabolites chlorogenic acid, dehydroascorbate and alanine. The hub genes identified from the network analysis are involved in signaling, the heat-shock response and ribosome biogenesis. The results from this study therefore reveal one or several putative signals from the ascorbate pool which modify the transcriptional response and elements downstream.Entities:
Keywords: ascorbate; cellular signaling; heat-shock response; redox; ribosome biogenesis; tomato (Solanum lycopersicum); translation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29491875 PMCID: PMC5817626 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Biological system showing the enzymes studied. Schematic diagram of the enzymes studied in tomato using RNAi. GLD, galactonolactone dehydrogenase, a mitochondrial enzyme; AO, ascorbate oxidase, probably apoplastic; MDHAR, monodehydroascorbate reductase, a cytosolic and peroxisomal isoform. Ascorbate is generated in the mitochondrion and is transported into the cell via an unknown mechanism. Ascorbate oxidase oxidizes ascorbate to monodehydroascorbate which will disproportionate into dehydroascorbate and ascorbate. Monodehydroascorbate is recycled to ascorbate by enzymes with monodehydroascorbate reductase activity.
Plant phenotypes of transgenic lines and WT.
| WT | 26.2 | 3.7 | a | 193.0 | 9.0 | b | 2.7 | 0.2 | b | 5.84 | 0.32 | b | 313 | 46 | a |
| AO | 23.7 | 1.8 | a | 181.8 | 4.9 | ab | 2.5 | 0.2 | ab | 5.74 | 0.27 | ab | 296 | 49 | a |
| GLD | 24.5 | 2.3 | a | 171.3 | 6.3 | a | 2.4 | 0.1 | a | 5.22 | 0.31 | a | 348 | 10 | a |
| MDHAR | 25.3 | 2.2 | a | 191.8 | 14.0 | b | 2.7 | 0.3 | b | 6.06 | 0.79 | b | 326 | 37 | a |
Measurements were carried out on greenhouse-grown plants as described in the Materials and methods. Data show means from 10 plants per line with standard error (SE). A comparison of means was carried out using a Kruskal Wallis test with correction (Dunn). Different letters indicate significant differences (5% significance level).
Fruit phenotypes of transgenic lines and WT.
| WT | 40.3 | 2.1 | a | 6.3 | 1.2 | a | 7.1 | 0.1 | a |
| AO | 41.9 | 1.5 | b | 6.1 | 0.8 | a | 7.0 | 0.1 | a |
| GLD | 42.7 | 1.4 | b | 6.0 | 1.0 | a | 6.8 | 0.1 | a |
| MDHAR | 40.7 | 1.8 | a | 3.8 | 0.9 | b | 7.0 | 0.1 | a |
Measurements were carried out on greenhouse-grown plants as described in the Materials and methods. Data show means from at least 6 fruits per plant of 10 plants per line with standard error (SE). A comparison of means was carried out using a Kruskal Wallis test with correction (Dunn). Different letters indicate significant differences (5% significance level).
Fruit physical characteristics of transgenic lines and WT at harvest.
| WT | 9.3 | 0.4 | a | 25.7 | 0.4 | a | 49.5 | 2.5 | a | 5.7 | 0.2 | a | 10.3 | 1.0 | a | 0.043 | 0.001 | a |
| AO | 8.3 | 0.4 | a | 24.4 | 0.5 | ab | 43.1 | 3.0 | a | 4.6 | 0.2 | b | 13.8 | 1.6 | a | 0.049 | 0.003 | ab |
| GLD | 7.8 | 0.4 | a | 23.6 | 0.5 | b | 49.4 | 4.0 | a | 5.4 | 0.3 | ab | 13.1 | 1.7 | a | 0.046 | 0.001 | a |
| MDHAR | 5.3 | 0.3 | b | 21.1 | 0.4 | c | 49.9 | 2.6 | a | 4.6 | 0.3 | b | 15.7 | 1.7 | a | 0.063 | 0.002 | bc |
Fruit physical characteristics were measured on red-ripe fruit of at least 20 fruit per line as described in the Materials and methods. Measurements show means with standard error (SE). A comparison of means was carried out using a Kruskal Wallis test with correction (Dunn). Different letters indicate significant differences (5% significance level). a.
Ascorbate and dehydroascorbate levels in orange fruit pericarp of transgenic lines and WT.
| WT | 15.46 | 1.30 | a | 2.71 | 1.39 | ab |
| AO | 18.99 | 1.97 | ab | 4.73 | 1.32 | a |
| GLD | 19.19 | 0.65 | ab | 2.83 | 0.97 | ab |
| MDHAR | 21.72 | 1.05 | b | 0 | 0.68 | b |
Ascorbate and dehydroascorbate were assayed in the pericarp tissue (3 biological replicates of 30 fruits per pool) of the lines by a spectrophotometric method. Measurements show means with standard error (SE). A comparison of means was carried out using a Kruskal Wallis test with correction (Dunn). Different letters indicate significant differences (5% significance level).
Polyphenols in orange fruit pericarp of transgenic lines and WT.
| WT | 3245.2 | 31.2 | ab | 3.5 | 0.0 | a | 1.3 | 0.0 | ab | 0.4 | 0.00 | a | 435.5 | 2.9 | a |
| AO | 2537.5 | 81.5 | a | 3.0 | 0.2 | a | 1.0 | 0.1 | a | 0.4 | 0.02 | a | 397.1 | 8.1 | a |
| GLD | 3029.0 | 298.5 | ab | 3.2 | 0.5 | a | 1.1 | 0.1 | ab | 0.4 | 0.01 | a | 406.0 | 21.4 | a |
| MDHAR | 3554.4 | 68.3 | b | 3.7 | 0.2 | a | 1.5 | 0.1 | b | 0.3 | 0.01 | a | 446.7 | 21.3 | a |
Polyphenolic compounds were assayed in the pericarp tissue (3 biological replicates of 30 fruits per pool) of the lines by HPLC-DAD. When the purified compound was not available for exact quantification, arbitrary units corresponding to peak surface were used. Measurements show means with standard error (SE). A comparison of means was carried out using a Kruskal Wallis test with correction (Dunn). Different letters indicate significant differences (5% significance level).
Figure 2Accumulation of metabolites in orange pericarp fruit (3 biological replicates of 30 fruits) of the transgenic lines and wild-type. All metabolites except for ascorbate, dehydroascorbate and the polyphenols which were analyzed by specific methods, were analyzed by 1H-NMR. (A) Heatmap showing a log2 of the metabolite ratio with the wild-type for each transgenic line. The scale goes from green (metabolite decreased compared to wild-type) to purple (metabolite increased). A comparison of the means was carried out using a Kruskal Wallis test with correction (Dunn). Different letters indicate significant differences (5% significance level). (B) Boxplots showing raw data for three differentially accumulated metabolites in the transgenic lines and wild-type: alanine, dehydroascorbate and chlorogenic acid. A comparison of the means was carried out using a Kruskal Wallis test with correction (Dunn). Different letters indicate significant differences (5% significance level).
Proteins in orange fruit pericarp of the lines as identified by mass spectrometry.
| CM148 | Solyc01g099190.2.1 | Lipoxygenase | No data | No data | ||
| MP25 | Solyc01g103450.2.1 | Chaperone DnaK | MDHAR down, AO up | |||
| MP26 | Solyc01g104920.2.1 | 26S protease regulatory subunit 8 homolog | −1.84 | 0.002 | ||
| MP14 | Solyc01g111300.2.1 | Cold shock protein-1 | ||||
| MP31 | Solyc02g070510.2.1 | Proteasome subunit alpha type | No data | No data | ||
| MB16 | Solyc02g080630.2.1 | Lactoylglutathione lyase | MDHAR down | |||
| MP18 | Solyc02g085790.2.1 | T-complex protein 1 subunit zeta | 5.82 | 0.005 | ||
| MP38 | Solyc02g091100.2.1 | Oxalyl-CoA decarboxylase | ||||
| MP42 | Solyc02g092670.1.1 | Subtilisin-like protease | No data | No data | ||
| JC65 | Solyc03g097270.2.1 | Cysteine proteinase inhibitor | MDHAR up | −1.40 | 0.017 | Yes |
| MP24 | Solyc04g045340.2.1 | Phosphoglucomutase | ||||
| MP29 | Solyc04g045340.2.1 | Phosphoglucomutase | ||||
| CM57 | Solyc05g005490.2.1 | Carbonic anhydrase | MDHAR up, AO down | 1.98 | 0.008 | No |
| MP17 | Solyc05g012580.1.1 | Unknown Protein | ||||
| MP11 | Solyc05g054580.2.1/Solyc09g091520.1.1 | 60S acidic ribosomal protein P0 | MDHAR up | −1.34 | 0.023 | Yes |
| JC26 | Solyc06g005160.2.1 | Ascorbate peroxidase | 1.25 | 0.036 | ||
| MP13 | Solyc06g005940.2.1 | Protein disulfide isomerase | ||||
| MP33 | Solyc06g005940.2.1 | Protein disulfide isomerase | ||||
| JC60 | Solyc06g059740.2.1 | Alcohol dehydrogenase 2 | 1.49 | 0.004 | ||
| TP17 | Solyc06g059740.2.1 | Alcohol dehydrogenase 2 | 1.49 | 0.004 | ||
| MP20 | Solyc06g060290.2.1 | Protein disulfide isomerase | MDHAR up, AO down | No data | No data | |
| MP36 | Solyc06g065270.2.1 | Adenylate kinase | ||||
| TP55 | Solyc06g076520.1.1 | Class I heat shock protein | MDHAR up | |||
| CM94 | Solyc07g005820.2.1 | Heat shock protein 70 | MDHAR down | |||
| MP23 | Solyc07g066600.2.1 | Phosphoglycerate kinase | −1.36 | 0.033 | ||
| MP22 | Solyc08g014130.2.1 | 2-isopropylmalate synthase 1 | 2.05 | 0.000 | ||
| JC79 | Solyc08g014130.2.1 | 2-isopropylmalate synthase 1 | 2.05 | 0.000 | ||
| MP21 | Solyc08g062660.2.1 | Ran GTPase binding protein | No data | No data | ||
| MP41 | Solyc09g082060.2.1 | Cysteine synthase | ||||
| MP37 | Solyc09g083410.2.1 | Amidase hydantoinase/carbamoylase family protein | MDHAR down | No data | No data | |
| MP19 | Solyc09g090330.2.1 | Harpin binding protein 1 | No data | No data | ||
| MP12 | Solyc09g098150.2.1 | Metacaspase 7 | MDHAR up, AO down | 2.01 | 0.003 | No |
| MP16 | Solyc09g098150.2.1 | Metacaspase 7 | 2.01 | 0.003 | ||
| MP32 | Solyc09g098150.2.1 | Metacaspase 7 | 2.01 | 0.003 | ||
| MP34 | Solyc10g081240.1.1 | Protein grpE | ||||
| MP28 | Solyc10g086580.1.1 | Ribulose-1 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase 1 | ||||
| MP27 | Solyc11g006970.1.1 | Unknown protein DS12 from 2D-PAGE of leaf, chloroplastic | No data | No data | ||
| MP30 | Solyc11g068510.1.1 | F1F0-ATPase inhibitor protein | AO up | No data | No data | |
| MP35 | Solyc11g069000.1.1 | T-complex protein 1 subunit beta | −1.46 | 0.035 | ||
| MP15 | Solyc12g056230.1.1 | Glutathione peroxidase | No data | No data |
The predicted Solyc (.
Figure 3Heatmap showing protein levels in orange pericarp fruit (3 biological replicates of 30 fruits) of the transgenic lines and wild-type. All proteins were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and identified by mass spectrometry. The log2 of the protein ratio with the wild-type for each transgenic line is presented. The scale goes from green (protein decreased compared to wild-type) to purple (protein increased). A comparison of the means was carried out using a Kruskal Wallis test with correction (Dunn). Different letters indicate significant differences (5% significance level). The proteins are identified by their Spot reference ID, the correspondence for which can be found in Table 6.
Figure 4Pairwise transcriptome comparisons as illustrated using volcano plots (log2 of fold change plotted against –log10 of the p-value for the differential expression). The expression of the 7633 genes from the microarray analysis of RNA extracted from the orange fruit pericarp (3 biological replicates of 30 fruit) of the different lines was compared with technical duplicates (dyes swapped). The comparisons were carried out first between the transgenic lines (GalLDH = GLD) and wild-type (AO-WT, comparison 1; GalLDH-WT, comparison 2; MDHAR-WT, comparison 3) before comparing the transgenic lines between themselves (AO-MDHAR, comparison 4, AO-GalLDH, comparison 6, and GalLDH-MDHAR, comparison 7). Afterward the hypothesis was tested that the WT expression was the average of the expression in two given transgenic lines (see Materials and methods; WT = average AO and MD, comparison 5, WT = average AO and GalLDH, comparison 8, WT = average GalLDH and MDHAR, comparison 9). The black line is drawn to represent a threshold p-value of 0.001, the red points represent differentially expressed genes.
Gene ontology enrichment on the 182 set of common genes using the tools available at Boyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University (http://bioinfo.bti.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/MetGenMAP/home.cgi).
| Unfolded protein binding | 3 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.038 |
| Structural molecule activity | 11 | 6.0 | 0.7 | 0.000 |
| Structural constituent of ribosome | 10 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 0.000 |
| Small molecule binding | 16 | 8.8 | 3.9 | 0.028 |
| Small GTPase regulator activity | 3 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.032 |
| Ribonucleotide binding | 11 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.025 |
| Purine ribonucleotide binding | 11 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.023 |
| Purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding | 11 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.025 |
| Purine nucleotide binding | 11 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.021 |
| Protein binding | 44 | 24.2 | 11.9 | 0.000 |
| Oxidoreductase activity acting on NADH or NADPH | 4 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.003 |
| Oxidoreductase activity | 16 | 8.8 | 2.8 | 0.000 |
| Organic cyclic compound binding | 16 | 8.8 | 3.3 | 0.013 |
| Nucleotide binding | 16 | 8.8 | 3.3 | 0.015 |
| Nucleoside phosphate binding | 16 | 8.8 | 3.3 | 0.012 |
| Catalytic activity | 53 | 29.1 | 17.9 | 0.000 |
| Binding | 79 | 43.4 | 25.1 | 0.000 |
| ATP binding | 9 | 4.9 | 1.4 | 0.020 |
| Adenyl ribonucleotide binding | 9 | 4.9 | 1.4 | 0.019 |
| Adenyl nucleotide binding | 9 | 4.9 | 1.4 | 0.020 |
The table shows the cluster frequency (the 182 genes) compared to the genome frequency for each category with the FDR-corrected p-value. The three categories (structural constituent of ribosomes, small GTPase regulator activity and oxidoreductase activity acting on NADH or NADPH) are where there is the biggest difference between the genome frequency and the cluster frequency.
Figure 5Network analysis (Cytoscape) showing the most highly connected genes based on their expression correlations. A topological overlap matrix was generated using the WGCNA script for the 182 core genes, the 22 metabolites and the 40 proteins. The edge file produced was imported into Cytoscape for network visualization. The network was visualized with a degree-sorted circle layout. The node sizes and node label sizes are proportional to the degree of connectivity of each node as fixed by Cytoscape. The color scale goes from blue (least connected nodes) to orange (most connected nodes). The hub genes are described in the table which gives the most highly connected genes following visualization of the topology overlap matrix, generated by the WGCNA “R” package, with Cytoscape. The ITAG2.4 identifier (Solyc) with the annotated function is shown with the degree of association as defined by Cytoscape. The transcriptome data (fold change between AO and MDHAR RNAi lines with the FDR corrected p-value on the transcript levels) for each gene are also shown.
Figure 6ROSMETER analysis of the WT vs. AO and WT vs. MDHAR transcriptome data from tomato fruit pericarp. Tomato genes were converted to the Arabidopsis homolog and the fold-changes and p-values were compared to the Arabidopsis transcriptomes previously described (Rosenwasser et al., 2013) which covered different stress conditions and/or mutant backgrounds in Arabidopsis as clusters as described in the text to the figure. The heatmap generated shows green for general transcriptome down-regulation (opposite fold-change) and red for up-regulation (similar fold-change) in the tomato lines compared to Arabidopsis.