| Literature DB >> 29490624 |
Cong Lan1,2, Xinjian Chen1,2,3, Yuxun Zhang1,2, Wei Wang1,2, Wei Eric Wang1,2, Yukai Liu1,2, Yue Cai1,2,4, Hongmei Ren1,2, Shuo Zheng1,2, Lin Zhou5,6, Chunyu Zeng7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antioxidants have shown great promise in stroke prevention. Diarylheptanoids (also known as diphenylheptanoids) are a small class of plant secondary metabolites that possess antioxidant activity greater than that of α-tocopherol. Curcumin is the best known member and is mainly extracted from turmeric. This study aimed to explore whether curcumin has a preventive effect on stroke.Entities:
Keywords: Endothelial function; Oxidative stress; SHRsp; Stroke; UCP2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29490624 PMCID: PMC5831583 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-018-0768-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1Characteristics of animals. System blood pressure (a), body weight (b), the ratio of brain (g)/body weight(kg) (c) were indicated from SHRsp with or without treatment by curcumin (100 mg/kg/day, n = 10)
General characteristics of rats in saline group and saline + curcumin group
| Saline( | Saline+Curcumin(N = 10) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | ||
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | |||||
| 0 week | 186.30 | 5.71 | 189.10 | 6.13 | 0.74 |
| 2 weeks | 215.50 | 4.56 | 208.00 | 5.77 | 0.32 |
| 4 weeks | 235.30 | 4.57 | 221.50 | 5.64 | 0.07 |
| Body weight (g) | |||||
| 0 week | 197.70 | 5.98 | 196.80 | 5.83 | 0.94 |
| 2 weeks | 214.50 | 4.81 | 220.90 | 5.54 | 0.39 |
| 4 weeks | 229.80 | 5.56 | 238.30 | 6.50 | 0.33 |
| Brain/Body weight (g/kg) | 5.01 | 0.29 | 4.69 | 0.37 | 0.50 |
Fig. 2Effects of curcumin on incidence of stroke (a) and survival time (b) from SHRsp. The product limit (Kaplan-Meier) estimate of the cumulative stroke and survival was assessed with the log-rank test to evaluate for significant differences in stroke and survival. (n = 10)
Fig. 3Effects of curcumin on carotid artery function in SHRsp. SHRsp was fed with curcumin (100 mg/kg/day,4 weeks); carotid artery from SHRsp was exposed to acetylcholine (ACH, n = 5 each group, a), sodium nitroprusside (SNP, n = 5 each group, b) and phenylephrine (PHE, n = 6 each group, c), the vasodilation or vasoconstriction was determined
Comparison of arteries relaxation in vitro between saline group and saline + curcumin group
| Saline | Saline + Curcumin | P value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SEM | N | Mean | SEM | N | ||
| Relaxation (%) to actylcholine (Log[M]) | |||||||
| -9 | 2.80 | 0.66 | 5 | 3.20 | 0.86 | 5 | 0.72 |
| -8 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 5 | 8.60 | 1.33 | 5 | 0.16 |
| -7 | 8.80 | 1.07 | 5 | 13.40 | 1.44 | 5 | 0.03 |
| -6 | 15.80 | 1.07 | 5 | 30.20 | 4.13 | 5 | 0.01 |
| -5 | 25.00 | 2.17 | 5 | 47.60 | 3.83 | 5 | 0.00 |
| Relaxation (%) to sodium nitroprusside (Log[M]) | |||||||
| -10 | 6.80 | 1.39 | 5 | 8.60 | 0.93 | 5 | 0.31 |
| -9 | 12.80 | 1.56 | 5 | 16.80 | 2.22 | 5 | 0.18 |
| -8 | 26.40 | 2.38 | 5 | 32.60 | 2.84 | 5 | 0.13 |
| -7 | 44.20 | 4.09 | 5 | 61.40 | 3.93 | 5 | 0.02 |
| -6 | 76.60 | 4.37 | 5 | 90.00 | 3.36 | 5 | 0.04 |
| Contraction (mg) to phenylephrine (Log[M]) | |||||||
| -10 | 6.83 | 0.79 | 6 | 8.33 | 1.54 | 6 | 0.41 |
| -9 | 30.83 | 2.71 | 6 | 42.17 | 4.54 | 6 | 0.06 |
| -8 | 130.17 | 16.80 | 6 | 130.00 | 4.06 | 6 | 0.99 |
| -7 | 413.50 | 43.84 | 6 | 456.17 | 28.35 | 6 | 0.43 |
| -6 | 722.67 | 58.53 | 6 | 825.67 | 31.08 | 6 | 0.15 |
| -5 | 891.67 | 45.46 | 6 | 948.83 | 46.27 | 6 | 0.40 |
Fig. 4Effects of curcumin on NO and ROS accumulation in the basilar artery and plasma from SHRsp. SHRsp was fed with or without curcumin (100 mg/kg/day,4 weeks), the plasma levels of nitrate/nitrite (a), SOD (b) and MDA (c) were determined by assay kits (n = 8 each group). After the basilar arteries were isolated from SHRsp, NO and ROS expressions were determined by DAF-2 AF fluorescence (green, n = 3) and DHE staining (red, n = 3) (d)
Comparison of plasma nitrate/nitrite, SOD and MDA between saline group and saline + curcumin group
| Saline | Saline + Curcumin | P value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SEM | N | Mean | SEM | N | ||
| Plasma nitrate / nitrite (μmol/L) | 5.11 | 1.38 | 8 | 9.91 | 1.20 | 8 | 0.02 |
| Plasma SOD (U/L) | 3.05 | 0.56 | 8 | 4.94 | 0.56 | 8 | 0.03 |
| Plasma MDA (μmol/L) | 31.69 | 5.06 | 8 | 17.01 | 3.05 | 8 | 0.03 |
Fig. 5Role of UCP2 on the regulation of curcumin on ROS and NO accumulation in HUVECs. a: SHRsp was fed with curcumin (100 mg/kg/day) for 4 weeks, expression of UCP2 mRNA in carotid artery SHRsp was determined by RT-PCR, Result was indicated as ratio of UCP2 and β-actin. (n = 6). b: HUVECs were exposed to different doses of H2O2 (10, 20, 50, 100 μmol) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured by CCK-8 assay (n = 7). c: HUVECs were pre-treated with curcumin (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5,1, 5 μmol/L) for 2 h and then co-incubated with H2O2 (20 μmol/L) for 24 h. The cell viability was measured by CCK-8 assay (n = 7). d-f: HUVECs were exposed to different reagents (H2O2 20 μmol/L, curcumin 1 μmol/L, genipin 10 μmol/L). UCP2 expression was examined by western blot (d). Representative images of ROS (e) and NO (f) staining were shown (D: n = 5; E and F were repeated at least three times)