Literature DB >> 29490604

Characterization of In Vitro Reconstructed Human Normotrophic, Hypertrophic, and Keloid Scar Models.

Grace C Limandjaja1, Lenie J van den Broek1, Melanie Breetveld1, Taco Waaijman1, Stan Monstrey2, Edith M de Boer1, Rik J Scheper3, Frank B Niessen4, Susan Gibbs1,5.   

Abstract

To understand scar pathology, develop new drugs, and provide a platform for personalized medicine, physiologically relevant human scar models are required, which are characteristic of different scar pathologies. Hypertrophic scars and keloids are two types of abnormal scar resulting from unknown abnormalities in the wound healing process. While they display different clinical behavior, differentiation between the two can be difficult-which in turn means that it is difficult to develop optimal therapeutic strategies. The aim of this study was to develop in vitro reconstructed human hypertrophic and keloid scar models and compare these to normotrophic scar and normal skin models to identify distinguishing biomarkers. Keratinocytes and fibroblasts from normal skin and scar types (normotrophic, hypertrophic, keloid) were used to reconstruct skin models. All skin models showed a reconstructed differentiated epidermis on a fibroblast populated collagen-elastin matrix. Both abnormal scar types showed increased contraction, dermal thickness, and myofibroblast staining compared to normal skin and normotrophic scar. Notably, the expression of extracellular matrix associated genes showed distinguishing profiles between all scar types and normal skin (hyaluronan synthase-1, matrix-metalloprotease-3), between keloid and normal skin (collagen type IV), between normal scar and keloid (laminin α1), and between keloid and hypertrophic scar (matrix-metalloprotease-1, integrin α5). Also, inflammatory cytokine and growth factor secretion (CCL5, CXCL1, CXCL8, CCL27, IL-6, HGF) showed differential secretion between scar types. Our results strongly suggest that abnormal scars arise from different pathologies rather than simply being on different ends of the scarring spectrum. Furthermore, such normal skin and scar models together with biomarkers, which distinguish the different scar types, would provide an animal free, physiologically relevant scar diagnostic and drug testing platform for the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hypertrophic scar; keloid; organotypic; scar model; skin; wound healing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29490604     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  11 in total

Review 1.  The Northwestern Abdominoplasty Scar Model: A Tool for High-Throughput Assessment of Scar Therapeutics.

Authors:  Ji-Cheng Hsieh; Chitang J Joshi; Rou Wan; Robert D Galiano
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Monocytes co-cultured with reconstructed keloid and normal skin models skew towards M2 macrophage phenotype.

Authors:  Grace C Limandjaja; Taco Waaijman; Sanne Roffel; Frank B Niessen; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 3.  The Keloid Disorder: Heterogeneity, Histopathology, Mechanisms and Models.

Authors:  Grace C Limandjaja; Frank B Niessen; Rik J Scheper; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-05-26

4.  The Effects of the Transforming Growth Factor-β1 (TGF-β1) Signaling Pathway on Cell Proliferation and Cell Migration are Mediated by Ubiquitin Specific Protease 4 (USP4) in Hypertrophic Scar Tissue and Primary Fibroblast Cultures.

Authors:  Yong Huang; Yuting Wang; Xueming Wang; Lixin Lin; Peng Wang; Junjun Sun; Lei Jiang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-04-20

5.  Pilot Study of the Biological Properties and Vascularization of 3D Printed Bilayer Skin Grafts.

Authors:  Yige Huyan; Qin Lian; Tingze Zhao; Dichen Li; Jiankang He
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2020-01-21

Review 6.  Hypertrophic scars and keloids: Overview of the evidence and practical guide for differentiating between these abnormal scars.

Authors:  Grace C Limandjaja; Frank B Niessen; Rik J Scheper; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 7.  The Epidermis in Microgravity and Unloading Conditions and Their Effects on Wound Healing.

Authors:  Stefano Bacci; Daniele Bani
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-22

8.  Reconstructed human keloid models show heterogeneity within keloid scars.

Authors:  Grace C Limandjaja; Leonarda J van den Broek; Taco Waaijman; Melanie Breetveld; Stan Monstrey; Rik J Scheper; Frank B Niessen; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 3.017

9.  Topical essential fatty acid oil on wounds: Local and systemic effects.

Authors:  Bruno Grosselli Lania; Joseane Morari; Amanda Roberta de Almeida; Marilene Neves da Silva; Gislaine Vieira-Damiani; Karina de Almeida Lins; Carlos Lenz César; Lício Augusto Velloso; Nilson Borlina Maia; Maria Letícia Cintra; Paulo Eduardo Neves Ferreira Velho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Single-Cell and Bulk Transcriptome Data Integration Reveals Dysfunctional Cell Types and Aberrantly Expressed Genes in Hypertrophic Scar.

Authors:  Shunuo Zhang; Yixin Zhang; Peiru Min
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.