Literature DB >> 29490531

The development of a pragmatic, clinically driven ultrasound curriculum in a UK medical school.

Richard J Wakefield1, Asoka Weerasinghe2, Patrick Tung2, Laura Smith3, James Pickering4, Tendekayi Msimanga5, Mohit Arora6, Karen Flood7, Pawan Gupta8, Suzanne Bickerdike9, James McLaughlan10, Ashley Uttley11, Jean Wilson12, Tony Evans13, Stephen Wolstenhulme11,14, Trudie E Roberts9.   

Abstract

Whether ultrasound (US) should be incorporated into a medical undergraduate curriculum remains a matter of debate within the medical education arena. There are clear potential benefits to its early introduction particularly with respect to the study of living anatomy and physiology in addition to the learning of clinical skills and procedures required for the graduate clinical practice. However, this needs to be balanced against what is perceived as an added value in addition to financial and time constraints which may potentially lead to the sacrifice of other aspects of the curriculum. Several medical schools have already reported their experiences of teaching US either as a standalone course or as a fully integrated vertical curriculum. This article describes and discusses the initial experience of a UK medical school that has taken the steps to develop its own pragmatic vertical US curriculum based on clinical endpoints with the intent of using US to enhance the learning experience of students and equipping them with the skills required for the safe practice as a junior doctor.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29490531     DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1439579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  4 in total

1.  Implementation of a point-of-care ultrasound skills practicum for hospitalists.

Authors:  Emily Cochard; Zachary Fulkerson; W Graham Carlos
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-07-25

2.  Do we need a core curriculum for medical students? A scoping review.

Authors:  Maulina Sharma; Ruth Murphy; Gillian A Doody
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  International consensus conference recommendations on ultrasound education for undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Richard A Hoppmann; Jeanette Mladenovic; Lawrence Melniker; Radu Badea; Michael Blaivas; Miguel Montorfano; Alfred Abuhamad; Vicki Noble; Arif Hussain; Gregor Prosen; Tomás Villen; Gabriele Via; Ramon Nogue; Craig Goodmurphy; Marcus Bastos; G Stephen Nace; Giovanni Volpicelli; Richard J Wakefield; Steve Wilson; Anjali Bhagra; Jongyeol Kim; David Bahner; Chris Fox; Ruth Riley; Peter Steinmetz; Bret P Nelson; John Pellerito; Levon N Nazarian; L Britt Wilson; Irene W Y Ma; David Amponsah; Keith R Barron; Renee K Dversdal; Mike Wagner; Anthony J Dean; David Tierney; James W Tsung; Paula Nocera; José Pazeli; Rachel Liu; Susanna Price; Luca Neri; Barbara Piccirillo; Adi Osman; Vaughan Lee; Nitha Naqvi; Tomislav Petrovic; Paul Bornemann; Maxime Valois; Jean-Francoise Lanctot; Robert Haddad; Deepak Govil; Laura A Hurtado; Vi Am Dinh; Robert M DePhilip; Beatrice Hoffmann; Resa E Lewiss; Nayana A Parange; Akira Nishisaki; Stephanie J Doniger; Paul Dallas; Kevin Bergman; J Oscar Barahona; Ximena Wortsman; R Stephen Smith; Craig A Sisson; James Palma; Mike Mallin; Liju Ahmed; Hassan Mustafa
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2022-07-27

4.  The Canadian Medical Student Ultrasound Curriculum: A Statement From the Canadian Ultrasound Consensus for Undergraduate Medical Education Group.

Authors:  Irene W Y Ma; Peter Steinmetz; Kirstin Weerdenburg; Michael Y Woo; Paul Olszynski; Claire L Heslop; Stephen Miller; Gillian Sheppard; Vijay Daniels; Janeve Desy; Maxime Valois; Luke Devine; Heather Curtis; Michael J Romano; Patrick Martel; Tomislav Jelic; Claude Topping; Drew Thompson; Barbara Power; Jason Profetto; Pete Tonseth
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.