Literature DB >> 29490512

A retrospective study to assess resource utilization and costs in patients with post-stroke spasticity in the United Kingdom.

Mireia Raluy-Callado1, Andrew Cox1, Sharon MacLachlan1, Abdel M Bakheit2, A Peter Moore3, Jerome Dinet4, Sylvie Gabriel4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Post-stroke spasticity (PSS) is a common complication following stroke. This study describes the differences in healthcare resource utilization between patients who do and do not develop PSS in the UK.
METHODS: Adults registered in The Health Improvement Network database with a recorded stroke between 2007 and 2011 were included. PSS was identified through Read codes; machine learning was used to retrospectively identify unrecorded PSS events. Patients with diagnosed or predicted PSS in the 12 months after stroke were matched to those with no PSS on age, sex, number of strokes, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities using the nearest neighbor algorithm. Utilization and costs associated with general practitioner visits, nurse visits, hospitalizations, referrals to specialists, laboratory tests, and medications in the 12 months after stroke were compared.
RESULTS: Overall, 2,951 PSS cases were matched to 37,753 controls. During the first year, more PSS cases visited a physiotherapist (19% vs 7%) and occupational therapist (12% vs 5%) compared to controls. A greater proportion of cases were also referred to specialists (76% vs 64%) and hospitalized (33% vs 9%) compared to controls. Medication for spasticity was, on average, 14.68 prescriptions for cases and 5.64 for controls. Total mean costs per patient were £1,270 (standard deviation [SD] = 772) and £635 (SD = 273) for cases and controls, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Costs after stroke for patients developing PSS are twice as high compared to patients who do not develop it, with the major driver being the number of hospital admissions. This highlights the need for better recording and closer management of PSS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Costs; Matched cohort study; Post-stroke spasticity; Resource utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29490512     DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1447449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  5 in total

1.  Tuina for spasticity of poststroke: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiongshuai Zhang; Guangcheng Ji; Fang Cao; Yihan Sun; Guanyu Hu; Shaoqian Sun; Yanze Liu; Jiazhen Cao; Yufeng Wang; Xiaohong Xu; Bailin Song
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Electrocupuncture combined rehabilitation therapy for upper limb spasticity after stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huijuan Lou; Zhanxin Li; Tingting Pang; Xinxin Zhang; Meng Meng; Kang Yang; Hongshi Zhang; Yufeng Wang; Deyu Cong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Tuina combined with physical therapy for spasticity of poststroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Ji; Yufeng Wang; Huijuan Lou; Yuxin Zhang; Yangshengjie Liu; Xu Zheng; Xiushuang Jia; Kang Yang; Hongshi Zhang; Deyu Cong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Protocol for the economic evaluation of the InTENSE program for rehabilitation of chronic upper limb spasticity.

Authors:  Rachel Milte; Julie Ratcliffe; Louise Ada; Coralie English; Maria Crotty; Natasha A Lannin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Decreased spasticity of Baishaoluoshi Decoction through the BDNF/TrKB-KCC2 pathway on poststroke spasticity rats.

Authors:  Le Xie; Yao Xie; Guo Mao; Sijia Cao; Rui Fang; Shen Zhou; Junlin Jiang; Ting Yao; Jianhu Fan; Dong Liu; Dahua Wu; Jinwen Ge
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 1.837

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.