Markku Lähteenvuo1, Antti Tanskanen1,2,3, Heidi Taipale2,4,5, Fabian Hoti6, Pia Vattulainen6, Eduard Vieta7, Jari Tiihonen1,2. 1. Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. 2. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Impact Assessment Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland. 4. Kuopio Research Centre of Geriatric Care, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. 5. School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. 6. EPID Research Oy, Espoo, Finland. 7. Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Abstract
Importance: Mood stabilizers and antipsychotics are the main maintenance treatments for bipolar disorder. Lithium is considered to be the most effective mood stabilizer, but very little is known about overall health outcomes associated with specific treatments and the comparative long-term effectiveness of specific psychotropics or routes of administration in the prevention of rehospitalizations. Objective: To study the comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments in the prevention of rehospitalization in a nationwide cohort of patients with bipolar disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study examined the risk of psychiatric, cardiovascular, and all-cause hospitalization from January 1, 1987, to December 31, 2012, among all patients in Finland who had been hospitalized for bipolar disorder (N = 18 018; mean follow-up time, 7.2 years) using prospectively gathered nationwide databases for hospitalization and dispensed medications. The primary analysis was within-individual analysis, in which each individual was used as his or her own control to eliminate selection bias. The study adjusted for the effect of concomitant psychotropic medications, duration of illness, and the temporal orders of exposure and nonexposure periods. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2012. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for rehospitalization were calculated. Results: Among the cohort (9558 women and 8460 men; mean [SD] age, 46.6 [17.0] years), 9721 patients (54.0%) had at least 1 psychiatric rehospitalization. In comparison between use and no use among specific agents reaching nominal statistical significance, risperidone long-acting injection (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.34-1.00]), gabapentin (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.44-0.77]), perphenazine long-acting injection (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.41-0.88]), and lithium carbonate (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.60-0.73]) were associated with the lowest risk of psychiatric rehospitalization. Concerning all-cause hospitalization, lithium (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66-0.76]) was associated with the lowest risk. The most frequently used antipsychotic treatment, quetiapine fumarate, showed only modest effectiveness (risk of psychiatric rehospitalization: HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-0.98]; risk of all-cause hospitalization: HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.98]). Long-acting injections were associated with substantially better outcomes compared with identical oral antipsychotics (risk of psychiatric rehospitalization: HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55-0.90]; risk of all-cause hospitalization: HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57-0.86]). Results from sensitivity analyses showed consistent beneficial effects only for lithium and for long-acting injections compared with their oral counterparts. Conclusions and Relevance: Lithium was the most effective mood stabilizer, and long-acting injections the most effective antipsychotics, in preventing hospitalization due to mental or physical illness.
Importance: Mood stabilizers and antipsychotics are the main maintenance treatments for bipolar disorder. Lithium is considered to be the most effective mood stabilizer, but very little is known about overall health outcomes associated with specific treatments and the comparative long-term effectiveness of specific psychotropics or routes of administration in the prevention of rehospitalizations. Objective: To study the comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments in the prevention of rehospitalization in a nationwide cohort of patients with bipolar disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study examined the risk of psychiatric, cardiovascular, and all-cause hospitalization from January 1, 1987, to December 31, 2012, among all patients in Finland who had been hospitalized for bipolar disorder (N = 18 018; mean follow-up time, 7.2 years) using prospectively gathered nationwide databases for hospitalization and dispensed medications. The primary analysis was within-individual analysis, in which each individual was used as his or her own control to eliminate selection bias. The study adjusted for the effect of concomitant psychotropic medications, duration of illness, and the temporal orders of exposure and nonexposure periods. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2012. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for rehospitalization were calculated. Results: Among the cohort (9558 women and 8460 men; mean [SD] age, 46.6 [17.0] years), 9721 patients (54.0%) had at least 1 psychiatric rehospitalization. In comparison between use and no use among specific agents reaching nominal statistical significance, risperidone long-acting injection (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.34-1.00]), gabapentin (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.44-0.77]), perphenazine long-acting injection (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.41-0.88]), and lithium carbonate (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.60-0.73]) were associated with the lowest risk of psychiatric rehospitalization. Concerning all-cause hospitalization, lithium (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66-0.76]) was associated with the lowest risk. The most frequently used antipsychotic treatment, quetiapine fumarate, showed only modest effectiveness (risk of psychiatric rehospitalization: HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-0.98]; risk of all-cause hospitalization: HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.98]). Long-acting injections were associated with substantially better outcomes compared with identical oral antipsychotics (risk of psychiatric rehospitalization: HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55-0.90]; risk of all-cause hospitalization: HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57-0.86]). Results from sensitivity analyses showed consistent beneficial effects only for lithium and for long-acting injections compared with their oral counterparts. Conclusions and Relevance: Lithium was the most effective mood stabilizer, and long-acting injections the most effective antipsychotics, in preventing hospitalization due to mental or physical illness.
Authors: Dina Popovic; Maria Reinares; Jose Manuel Goikolea; Caterina Mar Bonnin; Ana Gonzalez-Pinto; Eduard Vieta Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2011-10-15 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Joseph R Calabrese; Raymond Sanchez; Na Jin; Joan Amatniek; Kevin Cox; Brian Johnson; Pamela Perry; Peter Hertel; Pedro Such; Phyllis M Salzman; Robert D McQuade; Margaretta Nyilas; William H Carson Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Jari Tiihonen; Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz; Maila Majak; Juha Mehtälä; Fabian Hoti; Erik Jedenius; Dana Enkusson; Amy Leval; Jan Sermon; Antti Tanskanen; Heidi Taipale Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Jari Tiihonen; Antti Tanskanen; Fabian Hoti; Pia Vattulainen; Heidi Taipale; Juha Mehtälä; Markku Lähteenvuo Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Caterina del Mar Bonnín; Ana González-Pinto; Brisa Solé; María Reinares; Itxaso González-Ortega; Susana Alberich; Jose Manuel Crespo; Manel Salamero; Eduard Vieta; Anabel Martínez-Arán; Carla Torrent Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Danella M Hafeman; Brian Rooks; John Merranko; Fangzi Liao; Mary Kay Gill; Tina R Goldstein; Rasim Diler; Neal Ryan; Benjamin I Goldstein; David A Axelson; Michael Strober; Martin Keller; Jeffrey Hunt; Heather Hower; Lauren M Weinstock; Shirley Yen; Boris Birmaher Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Juan Antonio García-Carmona; Jorge Simal-Aguado; María Pilar Campos-Navarro; Francisco Valdivia-Muñoz; Alejandro Galindo-Tovar Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Azmeraw T Amare; Klaus Oliver Schubert; Liping Hou; Scott R Clark; Sergi Papiol; Micah Cearns; Urs Heilbronner; Franziska Degenhardt; Fasil Tekola-Ayele; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Tatyana Shekhtman; Mazda Adli; Nirmala Akula; Kazufumi Akiyama; Raffaella Ardau; Bárbara Arias; Jean-Michel Aubry; Lena Backlund; Abesh Kumar Bhattacharjee; Frank Bellivier; Antonio Benabarre; Susanne Bengesser; Joanna M Biernacka; Armin Birner; Clara Brichant-Petitjean; Pablo Cervantes; Hsi-Chung Chen; Caterina Chillotti; Sven Cichon; Cristiana Cruceanu; Piotr M Czerski; Nina Dalkner; Alexandre Dayer; Maria Del Zompo; J Raymond DePaulo; Bruno Étain; Stephane Jamain; Peter Falkai; Andreas J Forstner; Louise Frisen; Mark A Frye; Janice M Fullerton; Sébastien Gard; Julie S Garnham; Fernando S Goes; Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu; Paul Grof; Ryota Hashimoto; Joanna Hauser; Stefan Herms; Per Hoffmann; Andrea Hofmann; Esther Jiménez; Jean-Pierre Kahn; Layla Kassem; Po-Hsiu Kuo; Tadafumi Kato; John R Kelsoe; Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Sebastian Kliwicki; Barbara König; Ichiro Kusumi; Gonzalo Laje; Mikael Landén; Catharina Lavebratt; Marion Leboyer; Susan G Leckband; Alfonso Tortorella; Mirko Manchia; Lina Martinsson; Michael J McCarthy; Susan L McElroy; Francesc Colom; Marina Mitjans; Francis M Mondimore; Palmiero Monteleone; Caroline M Nievergelt; Markus M Nöthen; Tomas Novák; Claire O'Donovan; Norio Ozaki; Urban Ösby; Andrea Pfennig; James B Potash; Andreas Reif; Eva Reininghaus; Guy A Rouleau; Janusz K Rybakowski; Martin Schalling; Peter R Schofield; Barbara W Schweizer; Giovanni Severino; Paul D Shilling; Katzutaka Shimoda; Christian Simhandl; Claire M Slaney; Alessio Squassina; Thomas Stamm; Pavla Stopkova; Mario Maj; Gustavo Turecki; Eduard Vieta; Julia Veeh; Stephanie H Witt; Adam Wright; Peter P Zandi; Philip B Mitchell; Michael Bauer; Martin Alda; Marcella Rietschel; Francis J McMahon; Thomas G Schulze; Bernhard T Baune Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 13.437