Literature DB >> 29490105

Physical Activity Duration but Not Energy Expenditure Differs between Daily and Intermittent Breakfast Consumption in Adolescent Girls: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Julia K Zakrzewski-Fruer1, Emma K Wells1, Natasha S G Crawford2, Sahar M O Afeef2, Keith Tolfrey2.   

Abstract

Background: It is not known whether breakfast frequency affects physical activity (PA) in children or adolescents. Objective: This study examined the effect of daily compared with intermittent breakfast consumption on estimated PA energy expenditure (PAEE) in adolescent girls.
Methods: Under a randomized crossover design, 27 girls [mean ± SD age: 12.4 ± 0.5 y, body mass index (in kg/m2): 19.3 ± 3.0] completed two 7-d conditions. A standardized breakfast (∼1674 kJ) was consumed every day before 0900 in the daily breakfast consumption (DBC) condition. The standardized breakfast was consumed on only 3 d before 0900 in the intermittent breakfast consumption (IBC) condition, alternating with breakfast omission on the remaining 4 d (i.e., only water consumed before 1030). Combined heart rate accelerometry was used to estimate PAEE throughout each condition. Statistical analyses were completed by using condition × time of day repeated-measures ANOVA. The primary outcome was PAEE and the secondary outcome was time spent in PA.
Results: Daily estimated PAEE from sedentary or light-, moderate-, or vigorous-intensity PA and total PAEE were not significantly different between the conditions. The condition × time of day interaction for sedentary time (P = 0.05) indicated that the girls spent an additional 11.5 min/d being sedentary in the IBC condition compared with the DBC condition from 1530 to bedtime (P = 0.04). Light PA was 19.8 min/d longer in the DBC condition than in the IBC condition (P = 0.05), which was accumulated from waking to 1030 (P = 0.04) and from 1530 to bedtime (P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in time spent in moderate PA or vigorous PA between the conditions. Conclusions: Adolescent girls spent more time in light PA before 1030 and after school and spent less time sedentary after school when a standardized breakfast was consumed daily than when consumed intermittently across 7 d. However, breakfast manipulation did not affect estimated daily PAEE. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as ISRCTN74579070.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29490105     DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxx055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  3 in total

1.  Association between breakfast frequency and physical activity and sedentary time: a cross-sectional study in children from 12 countries.

Authors:  Julia K Zakrzewski-Fruer; Fiona B Gillison; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Emily F Mire; Stephanie T Broyles; Catherine M Champagne; Jean-Philippe Chaput; Kara D Denstel; Mikael Fogelholm; Gang Hu; Estelle V Lambert; Carol Maher; José Maia; Tim Olds; Vincent Onywera; Olga L Sarmiento; Mark S Tremblay; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Martyn Standage
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle M Bohan Brown; Jillian E Milanes; David B Allison; Andrew W Brown
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-02-24

3.  Breakfast Consumption Suppresses Appetite but Does Not Increase Daily Energy Intake or Physical Activity Energy Expenditure When Compared with Breakfast Omission in Adolescent Girls Who Habitually Skip Breakfast: A 7-Day Randomised Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Julia Kirstey Zakrzewski-Fruer; Claire Seall; Keith Tolfrey
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.