Nasrien E Ibrahim1,2, Hanna K Gaggin1,2,3, Alexander Turchin2,3,4, Harshali K Patel5, Yang Song3, April Trebnick3, Gheorghe Doros3,6, Juan F Maya5, Christopher P Cannon2,3,7, James L Januzzi1,2,3. 1. Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 5B, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Cardiometabolic Trial, Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. 6. Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
Aims: High resting heart rate (HR ≥70 b.p.m.) is associated with worse clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Heart rate, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with beta-blocker (BB), and cardiovascular outcomes were evaluated in a large integrated health network. Methods and results: Using electronic health records we examined patients with chronic HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤35%) in sinus rhythm with at least 1 year of follow-up and available serial HR and medication data between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2014. Among 6071 patients followed for median of 1330 days across 73 586 total visits, median HR remained stable over time with 61.2% of the follow-up period with HR ≥70 b.p.m. At baseline, 27.9% of patients were on ≥ 50% GDMT target BB dose, 16.2% subjects at baseline, and 19.4% at the end of follow-up had HR ≥70 b.p.m. despite receiving ≥50% of target BB dose. In adjusted analyses, baseline HR was associated with all-cause mortality/heart failure (HF) hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.28 per 15 b.p.m. Heart rate increase; P < 0.001). In comparison, hazard ratio for BB dose was 0.97 (per 77.2 mg increase; P = 0.36). When evaluating patients based on HR and BB dose there was a significant difference in the cumulative hazard for all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (P < 0.001). For HF hospitalization, hazard appeared to be more closely associated with HR rather than BB dose (P = 0.01). Conclusion: In a real-world analysis, high resting HR was common in HFrEF patients and associated with adverse outcomes. Opportunities exist to improve GDMT and achieve HR control.
Aims: High resting heart rate (HR ≥70 b.p.m.) is associated with worse clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Heart rate, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with beta-blocker (BB), and cardiovascular outcomes were evaluated in a large integrated health network. Methods and results: Using electronic health records we examined patients with chronic HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤35%) in sinus rhythm with at least 1 year of follow-up and available serial HR and medication data between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2014. Among 6071 patients followed for median of 1330 days across 73 586 total visits, median HR remained stable over time with 61.2% of the follow-up period with HR ≥70 b.p.m. At baseline, 27.9% of patients were on ≥ 50% GDMT target BB dose, 16.2% subjects at baseline, and 19.4% at the end of follow-up had HR ≥70 b.p.m. despite receiving ≥50% of target BB dose. In adjusted analyses, baseline HR was associated with all-cause mortality/heart failure (HF) hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.28 per 15 b.p.m. Heart rate increase; P < 0.001). In comparison, hazard ratio for BB dose was 0.97 (per 77.2 mg increase; P = 0.36). When evaluating patients based on HR and BB dose there was a significant difference in the cumulative hazard for all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (P < 0.001). For HF hospitalization, hazard appeared to be more closely associated with HR rather than BB dose (P = 0.01). Conclusion: In a real-world analysis, high resting HR was common in HFrEF patients and associated with adverse outcomes. Opportunities exist to improve GDMT and achieve HR control.
Authors: James L Januzzi; Tariq Ahmad; Hillary Mulder; Adrian Coles; Kevin J Anstrom; Kirkwood F Adams; Justin A Ezekowitz; Mona Fiuzat; Nancy Houston-Miller; Daniel B Mark; Ileana L Piña; Gayle Passmore; David J Whellan; Lawton S Cooper; Eric S Leifer; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; G Michael Felker; Christopher M O'Connor Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Katherine E Kurgansky; Petra Schubert; Rachel Parker; Luc Djousse; Jerome B Riebman; David R Gagnon; Jacob Joseph Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 2.298