Almar A L Kok1,2, Fenna van Nes3, Dorly J H Deeg1, Guy Widdershoven4, Martijn Huisman1,2. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Sociology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This qualitative study applied a resilience perspective to socioeconomic inequalities in the functioning of older adults. We aimed to gain insight into how some older adults managed to age successfully despite having a low socioeconomic position (SEP) throughout their lives. Research Design and Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 resilient adults over the age of 79 years participating in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Participants were defined as resilient on the basis of having a low lifetime SEP and favorable trajectories of physical, mental, and social functioning. Grounded Theory coding techniques were applied to identify themes reflecting distinct ways in which participants dealt with what they indicated were the most significant adversities in their lives. The analysis focused on experiences linked to socioeconomic conditions. Results: Six themes reflecting psychological, behavioral, and social factors were derived from the data: drawing support from social contacts; investing in younger generations; taking actions to manage or improve socioeconomic conditions; putting the impact of a low SEP into perspective; persevering; and resigning oneself to adversity. Discussion and Implications: Findings suggest that successful aging despite a low SEP throughout one's lifetime requires considerable psychological and social resources. In addition, resignation and specific manifestations of generativity are identified as new elements of resilience. These findings may help to reduce the stereotyping of older adults with a low SEP, and nuance the heroic image of resilience as something that is primarily attributable to extraordinary individual abilities or efforts.
Background and Objectives: This qualitative study applied a resilience perspective to socioeconomic inequalities in the functioning of older adults. We aimed to gain insight into how some older adults managed to age successfully despite having a low socioeconomic position (SEP) throughout their lives. Research Design and Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 resilient adults over the age of 79 years participating in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Participants were defined as resilient on the basis of having a low lifetime SEP and favorable trajectories of physical, mental, and social functioning. Grounded Theory coding techniques were applied to identify themes reflecting distinct ways in which participants dealt with what they indicated were the most significant adversities in their lives. The analysis focused on experiences linked to socioeconomic conditions. Results: Six themes reflecting psychological, behavioral, and social factors were derived from the data: drawing support from social contacts; investing in younger generations; taking actions to manage or improve socioeconomic conditions; putting the impact of a low SEP into perspective; persevering; and resigning oneself to adversity. Discussion and Implications: Findings suggest that successful aging despite a low SEP throughout one's lifetime requires considerable psychological and social resources. In addition, resignation and specific manifestations of generativity are identified as new elements of resilience. These findings may help to reduce the stereotyping of older adults with a low SEP, and nuance the heroic image of resilience as something that is primarily attributable to extraordinary individual abilities or efforts.
Authors: Silvia S Klokgieters; Theo G van Tilburg; Dorly J H Deeg; Martijn Huisman Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Lindsey van der Meer; Lisa S Barsties; Leonie A Daalderop; Adja J M Waelput; Eric A P Steegers; Loes C M Bertens Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Claudia Cooper; Hassan Mansour; Christine Carter; Penny Rapaport; Sarah Morgan-Trimmer; Natalie L Marchant; Michaela Poppe; Paul Higgs; Janine Brierley; Noa Solomon; Jessica Budgett; Megan Bird; Kate Walters; Julie Barber; Jennifer Wenborn; Iain A Lang; Jonathan Huntley; Karen Ritchie; Helen C Kales; Henry Brodaty; Elisa Aguirre; Anna Betz; Marina Palomo Journal: Dementia (London) Date: 2021-04-29
Authors: Almar A L Kok; Jos W R Twisk; Fenneke Blom; Aartjan T F Beekman; Martijn Huisman Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 4.077