Literature DB >> 29489987

Practices and obstetric interventions in women from a state in the Northeast of Brazil.

Daniela Siqueira Prado1, Rosemar Barbosa Mendes2, Rosana Queiroz Gurgel3, Ikaro Daniel de Carvalho Barreto4, Felipa Daiana Bezerra5, Rosana Cipolotti1, Ricardo Queiroz Gurgel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe practices and interventions used during labor and childbirth and factors associated with such practices in puerperae in the state of Sergipe.
METHOD: A cross-sectional study with 768 postpartum women from 11 maternity hospitals interviewed 6 hours after delivery, and hospital records review. The associations between best practices and interventions used during labor and delivery with exposure variables were described using simple frequencies, percentages, crude and adjusted odds ratio (ORa) with the confidence interval.
RESULTS: Of the women in the study, 10.6% received food and 27.8% moved during labor; non-pharmacological methods for pain relief were performed in 26.1%; a partogram was filled in 39.4% of the charts; and an accompanying person was present in 40.6% of deliveries. Oxytocin, amniotomy and labor analgesia were used in 59.1%, 49.3% and 4.2% of women, respectively. Lithotomy position during childbirth was used in 95.2% of the cases, episiotomy in 43.9% and Kristeller maneuver in 31.7%. The variables most associated with cesarean section were private financing (ORa=4.27, 95CI 2.44-7.47), higher levels of education (ORa=4.54, 95CI 2.56-8.3) and high obstetric risk (ORa=1.9, 95CI 1.31-2.74). Women whose delivery was funded privately were more likely to have an accompanying person present (ORa=2.12, 95CI 1.18-3.79) and to undergo labor analgesia (ORa=4.96, 95CI 1.7-14.5).
CONCLUSION: Best practices are poorly performed and unnecessary interventions are frequent. The factors most associated with c-section were private funding, greater length of education and high obstetric risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29489987     DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.63.12.1039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)        ISSN: 0104-4230            Impact factor:   1.209


  3 in total

Review 1.  The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elise Farrington; Mairead Connolly; Laura Phung; Alyce N Wilson; Liz Comrie-Thomson; Meghan A Bohren; Caroline S E Homer; Joshua P Vogel
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Evidence-based Birth Attendance in Spain: Private versus Public Centers.

Authors:  Antonio Hernández-Martínez; Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano; Julián Rodríguez-Almagro; Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Juan Gómez-Salgado
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Episiotomy in Southern Brazil: prevalence, trend, and associated factors.

Authors:  Juraci A Cesar; Luana P Marmitt; Raúl A Mendoza-Sassi
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.106

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.