Literature DB >> 2948914

Detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by M-mode echocardiography. Anatomic validation, standardization, and comparison to other methods.

R B Devereux.   

Abstract

Because of its simplicity, widespread availability, relatively low cost, and lack of adverse effects, M-mode echocardiography has become the most widely used technique for measurement of human left ventricular mass. Necropsy comparison studies have yielded formulas for anatomically accurate estimation of left ventricular mass in patients with normally shaped ventricles using left ventricular measurements by either Penn or American Society of Echocardiography conventions, but M-mode methods are less accurate in abnormally shaped ventricles. The standard error of M-mode echocardiographic left ventricular mass measurements is approximately 40 g under difficult clinical recording conditions and 30 g or less for research studies of stable subjects. Interstudy variability of mass estimates appeared somewhat lower, resulting in 95% confidence limits for serial change up to 58 g for individual subjects and up to 10 g for study populations of 34 patients or more. The accuracy of M-mode echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular mass is similar to that of contrast angiography but may be exceeded by newer methods with greater cost or radiation exposure, including magnetic resonance imaging, cine-computed tomography, and three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction. Identification of left ventricular hypertrophy needs to take into account the influence of sex and body size, the variables that most influence normal ventricular mass, with provisional criteria for recognition of hypertrophy being left ventricular mass index over 134 g/m2 in men and above 110 g/m2 in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2948914     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.9.2_pt_2.ii19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  80 in total

1.  Patterns of body fat deposition in youth and their relation to left ventricular markers of adverse cardiovascular prognosis.

Authors:  G A Mensah; F A Treiber; G K Kapuku; H Davis; V A Barnes; W B Strong
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Maximal oxygen consumption is best predicted by measures of cardiac size rather than function in healthy adults.

Authors:  André La Gerche; Andrew T Burns; Andrew J Taylor; Andrew I Macisaac; Hein Heidbüchel; David L Prior
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Evaluation of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients with echocardiographic myocardial videodensitometry normalized by displacement.

Authors:  Xiao-Zhi Zheng; Lian-Fang Du; Hui-Ping Wang
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.363

4.  Effects of the aging process on left ventricular systolic and diastolic synchronicity indexes: insights from 160 "completely" healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Hyung-Kwan Kim; Dae-Won Sohn; Sung-A Chang; Keun-Ho Park; Jin-Shik Park; Yong-Jin Kim; Byung-Hee Oh; Young-Bae Park
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Predictors of left ventricular dilatation in young adults (from the Bogalusa Heart Study).

Authors:  Showkat A Haji; Rifat Eralp Ulusoy; Dharmendrakumar A Patel; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Wei Chen; Patrice Delafontaine; Gerald S Berenson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Left ventricular function in professional football players evaluated by tissue Doppler imaging and strain imaging.

Authors:  Mustafa Murat Tümüklü; Ilker Etikan; Cahide Soydaş Cinar
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Effect of endovascular stenting of aortic coarctation on biventricular function in adults.

Authors:  Yat-Yin Lam; Mehmet G Kaya; Wei Li; Vaikom S Mahadevan; Arif A Khan; Michael Y Henein; Michael Mullen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-06-17       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: identification of high-risk patients by metabolic, vascular, and inflammatory risk factors.

Authors:  Maya Peer; Mona Boaz; Matas Zipora; Marina Shargorodsky
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-12

9.  Addition of highly sensitive troponin T and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide to electrocardiography for detection of left ventricular hypertrophy: results from the Dallas Heart Study.

Authors:  Abelardo A Martinez-Rumayor; James A de Lemos; Anand K Rohatgi; Colby R Ayers; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Susan G Lakoski; Jarett D Berry; Amit Khera; Sandeep R Das
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Tissue doppler imaging can be useful to distinguish pathological from physiological left ventricular hypertrophy: a study in master athletes and mild hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  Giorgio Galanti; Loira Toncelli; Francesca Del Furia; Laura Stefani; Brunello Cappelli; Alessio De Luca; Maria Concetta Roberta Vono
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.