Literature DB >> 29489029

Serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for fibromyalgia.

Patrick Welsch1, Nurcan Üçeyler, Petra Klose, Brian Walitt, Winfried Häuser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is a clinically defined chronic condition of unknown etiology characterized by chronic widespread pain that often co-exists with sleep disturbances, cognitive dysfunction and fatigue. People with fibromyalgia often report high disability levels and poor quality of life. Drug therapy, for example, with serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), focuses on reducing key symptoms and improving quality of life. This review updates and extends the 2013 version of this systematic review.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) compared with placebo or other active drug(s) in the treatment of fibromyalgia in adults. SEARCH
METHODS: For this update we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, the US National Institutes of Health and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for published and ongoing trials and examined the reference lists of reviewed articles, to 8 August 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomized, controlled trials of any formulation of SNRIs against placebo or any other active treatment of fibromyalgia in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently extracted data, examined study quality, and assessed risk of bias. For efficacy, we calculated the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) for pain relief of 50% or greater and of 30% or greater, patient's global impression to be much or very much improved, dropout rates due to lack of efficacy, and the standardized mean differences (SMD) for fatigue, sleep problems, health-related quality of life, mean pain intensity, depression, anxiety, disability, sexual function, cognitive disturbances and tenderness. For tolerability we calculated number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) for withdrawals due to adverse events and for nausea, insomnia and somnolence as specific adverse events. For safety we calculated NNTH for serious adverse events. We undertook meta-analysis using a random-effects model. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table. MAIN
RESULTS: We added eight new studies with 1979 participants for a total of 18 included studies with 7903 participants. Seven studies investigated duloxetine and nine studies investigated milnacipran against placebo. One study compared desvenlafaxine with placebo and pregabalin. One study compared duloxetine with L-carnitine. The majority of studies were at unclear or high risk of bias in three to five domains.The quality of evidence of all comparisons of desvenlafaxine, duloxetine and milnacipran versus placebo in studies with a parallel design was low due to concerns about publication bias and indirectness, and very low for serious adverse events due to concerns about publication bias, imprecision and indirectness. The quality of evidence of all comparisons of duloxetine and desvenlafaxine with other active drugs was very low due to concerns about publication bias, imprecision and indirectness.Duloxetine and milnacipran had no clinically relevant benefit over placebo for pain relief of 50% or greater: 1274 of 4104 (31%) on duloxetine and milnacipran reported pain relief of 50% or greater compared to 591 of 2814 (21%) participants on placebo (risk difference (RD) 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.11; NNTB 11, 95% CI 9 to 14). Duloxetine and milnacipran had a clinically relevant benefit over placebo in patient's global impression to be much or very much improved: 888 of 1710 (52%) on duloxetine and milnacipran (RD 0.19, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.26; NNTB 5, 95% CI 4 to 8) reported to be much or very much improved compared to 354 of 1208 (29%) of participants on placebo. Duloxetine and milnacipran had a clinically relevant benefit compared to placebo for pain relief of 30% or greater. RD was 0.10; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.12; NNTB 10, 95% CI 8 to 12. Duloxetine and milnacipran had no clinically relevant benefit for fatigue (SMD -0.13, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.08; NNTB 18, 95% CI 12 to 29), compared to placebo. There were no differences between either duloxetine or milnacipran and placebo in reducing sleep problems (SMD -0.07; 95 % CI -0.15 to 0.01). Duloxetine and milnacipran had no clinically relevant benefit compared to placebo in improving health-related quality of life (SMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.25 to -0.15; NNTB 11, 95% CI 8 to 14).There were 794 of 4166 (19%) participants on SNRIs who dropped out due to adverse events compared to 292 of 2863 (10%) of participants on placebo (RD 0.07, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.10; NNTH 14, 95% CI 10 to 25). There was no difference in serious adverse events between either duloxetine, milnacipran or desvenlafaxine and placebo (RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.00).There was no difference between desvenlafaxine and placebo in efficacy, tolerability and safety in one small trial.There was no difference between duloxetine and desvenlafaxine in efficacy, tolerability and safety in two trials with active comparators (L-carnitine, pregabalin). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: The update did not change the major findings of the previous review. Based on low- to very low-quality evidence, the SNRIs duloxetine and milnacipran provided no clinically relevant benefit over placebo in the frequency of pain relief of 50% or greater, but for patient's global impression to be much or very much improved and in the frequency of pain relief of 30% or greater there was a clinically relevant benefit. The SNRIs duloxetine and milnacipran provided no clinically relevant benefit over placebo in improving health-related quality of life and in reducing fatigue. Duloxetine and milnacipran did not significantly differ from placebo in reducing sleep problems. The dropout rates due to adverse events were higher for duloxetine and milnacipran than for placebo. On average, the potential benefits of duloxetine and milnacipran in fibromyalgia were outweighed by their potential harms. However, a minority of people with fibromyalgia might experience substantial symptom relief without clinically relevant adverse events with duloxetine or milnacipran.We did not find placebo-controlled studies with other SNRIs than desvenlafaxine, duloxetine and milnacipran.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29489029      PMCID: PMC5846183          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010292.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  113 in total

Review 1.  Worldwide epidemiology of fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Luiz Paulo Queiroz
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-08

2.  Effective treatment of fibromyalgia comorbid with premenstrual dysphoric disorder with a low dose of venlafaxine.

Authors:  Mei-Chun Hsiao
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007

Review 3.  [Pharmacoepidemiological research with large health databases].

Authors:  F Andersohn; E Garbe
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Sleep problems and risk of fibromyalgia: longitudinal data on an adult female population in Norway.

Authors:  Paul J Mork; Tom I L Nilsen
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-01

5.  Flexible dosed duloxetine in the treatment of fibromyalgia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Lesley M Arnold; Daniel Clauw; Fujun Wang; Jonna Ahl; Paula J Gaynor; Madelaine M Wohlreich
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  An open clinical trial of venlafaxine treatment of fibromyalgia.

Authors:  M M Dwight; L M Arnold; H O'Brien; R Metzger; E Morris-Park; P E Keck
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.386

7.  A double-blind, multicenter trial comparing duloxetine with placebo in the treatment of fibromyalgia patients with or without major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Lesley M Arnold; Yili Lu; Leslie J Crofford; Madelaine Wohlreich; Michael J Detke; Smriti Iyengar; David J Goldstein
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-09

8.  Comparative efficacy versus effectiveness of initial antiretroviral therapy in clinical trials versus routine care.

Authors:  Justin S Routman; James H Willig; Andrew O Westfall; Sarah R Abroms; Mohit Varshney; Sunil Adusumilli; Jeroan J Allison; Karen G Savage; Michael S Saag; Michael J Mugavero
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Primary fibromyalgia (fibrositis): clinical study of 50 patients with matched normal controls.

Authors:  M Yunus; A T Masi; J J Calabro; K A Miller; S L Feigenbaum
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of duloxetine in Japanese fibromyalgia patients.

Authors:  Masato Murakami; Kenichi Osada; Hiromichi Mizuno; Toshimitsu Ochiai; Levent Alev; Kusuki Nishioka
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  [Pain prevention in the primary care setting : Facts for resident physicians].

Authors:  C Geber; B Kappis; T Bäsch; H R Casser
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  Efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Amnon A Berger; Yao Liu; Jeanne Nguyen; Robert Spraggins; Devin S Reed; Christopher Lee; Jamal Hasoon; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-06-22

3.  A Look at Commonly Utilized Serotonin Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs) in Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Christopher Robinson; Suhani Dalal; Ahish Chitneni; Anand Patil; Amnon A Berger; Syed Mahmood; Vwaire Orhurhu; Alan D Kaye; Jamal Hasoon
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 4.  Fibromyalgia in Older Individuals.

Authors:  Amir Minerbi; Mary-Ann Fitzcharles
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Brain glial activation in fibromyalgia - A multi-site positron emission tomography investigation.

Authors:  Daniel S Albrecht; Anton Forsberg; Angelica Sandström; Courtney Bergan; Diana Kadetoff; Ekaterina Protsenko; Jon Lampa; Yvonne C Lee; Caroline Olgart Höglund; Ciprian Catana; Simon Cervenka; Oluwaseun Akeju; Mats Lekander; George Cohen; Christer Halldin; Norman Taylor; Minhae Kim; Jacob M Hooker; Robert R Edwards; Vitaly Napadow; Eva Kosek; Marco L Loggia
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 6.  Best management of irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Christopher J Black; Alexander Charles Ford
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-28

7.  Efficacy and safety of propranolol for treatment of temporomandibular disorder pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Inna E Tchivileva; Holly Hadgraft; Pei Feng Lim; Massimiliano Di Giosia; Margarete Ribeiro-Dasilva; John H Campbell; Janet Willis; Robert James; Marcus Herman-Giddens; Roger B Fillingim; Richard Ohrbach; Samuel J Arbes; Gary D Slade
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 8.  Are serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors effective, tolerable, and safe for adults with fibromyalgia? A Cochrane Review summary with commentary.

Authors:  Frane Grubišić
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

9.  [Recommendations of the second update of the LONTS guidelines : Long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain].

Authors:  Winfried Häuser; Frietjof Bock; Michael Hüppe; Monika Nothacker; Heike Norda; Lukas Radbruch; Marcus Schiltenwolf; Matthias Schuler; Thomas Tölle; Annika Viniol; Frank Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  Association of Therapies With Reduced Pain and Improved Quality of Life in Patients With Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Oliveira Mascarenhas; Mateus Bastos Souza; Murilo Xavier Oliveira; Ana Cristina Lacerda; Vanessa Amaral Mendonça; Nicholas Henschke; Vinícius Cunha Oliveira
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.