Literature DB >> 29487813

Managing high risk glaucoma with the Ahmed valve implant: 20 years of experience.

Tryfon Rotsos1, Anastasia Tsioga1, Konstantinos Andreanos1, Andreas Diagourtas1, Petros Petrou1, Ilias Georgalas1, Dimitrios Papaconstantinou1.   

Abstract

AIM: To estimate the efficacy and safety of the Ahmed implant in patients with high risk for failure after glaucoma surgery.
METHODS: In 342 eyes of 342 patients with refractory glaucoma, even with application of medical treatment, the Ahmed valve was introduced for intraocular pressure (IOP) control, in the period of the last 20y. The nature of glaucoma was neovascular in 162 eyes, pseudophakic or aphakic in 49 eyes, inflammatory in 29 eyes and non working previous antiglaucomatic surgical interventions in 102 eyes.
RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 18 to 120mo with a mean follow-up of 63.2mo. IOP before the operation decreased from 31.6±10.4 mm Hg to 18.3±5.4 mm Hg (no systemic treatment) at the end of follow up period. When we compared the IOP values before the operation using ANOVA showed statistically significant difference (P<0.001). The success rate was 85.2% during the first semester, 76.8% at 12mo and 50.3% at the end of follow up period (18 to 120mo after implantation). Success rate was 25.7% in neovascular glaucoma, 63.2% in aphakic glaucoma and 73.8% in non working previous antiglaucomatic surgical interventions. Complications due to the implant were: serous choroidal detachment in 14.8%, blockage of the tube in 2.8%, malposition of the tube in 4.9%, suprachoroidal hemorrhage in 2.1%, cataract progression in 39.6% (phakic eyes), shallow anterior chamber in 9.2%, hyphaema in 28.9%, exposure of valve in 2.6%, exposure of tube in 9.3%, hypotony in 4.9% and conjunctival fibrosis in 41.5%.
CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that Ahmed valve implant had suchlike results as other implants concerning the IOP control, complications rate due to hypotony or over filtration in the first days after the intervention are not that frequent as with other valve implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ahmed valve; aphakic glaucoma; high risk glaucoma; inflammatory glaucoma; neovascular glaucoma; pseudophakic glaucoma

Year:  2018        PMID: 29487813      PMCID: PMC5824078          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.02.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  24 in total

1.  External filtering operations for glaucoma: the mechanism of function and failure.

Authors:  A E MAUMENEE
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1960

2.  Experimental studies of aqueous filtration using the Molteno implant.

Authors:  D S Minckler; A Shammas; M Wilcox; T E Ogden
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1987

3.  Investigations of the reasons for success and failure in the anterior shunt-to-the-encircling-band procedure in the treatment of refractory glaucoma.

Authors:  S S Schocket
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1986

4.  Trabecular surgery.

Authors:  A L Schwartz; D R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-08

5.  Management of uveitic glaucoma with Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation.

Authors:  A Da Mata; S E Burk; P A Netland; S Baltatzis; W Christen; C S Foster
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 6.  A Review of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant and Comparison with Other Surgical Operations.

Authors:  Ivano Riva; Gloria Roberti; Andreas Katsanos; Francesco Oddone; Luciano Quaranta
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  Wound healing in glaucoma filtering surgery.

Authors:  G L Skuta; R K Parrish
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Comparison of double-plate Molteno and Ahmed glaucoma valve in patients with advanced uncontrolled glaucoma.

Authors:  Ramesh S Ayyala; David Zurakowski; R Monshizadeh; Chian-Huey Hong; David Richards; William E Layden; B T Hutchinson; A R Bellows
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

Review 9.  Glaucoma drainage implant surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad A Aref; Steven J Gedde; Donald L Budenz
Journal:  Dev Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-17

Review 10.  Glaucoma drainage devices: a systematic literature review and current controversies.

Authors:  Chian-Huey Hong; Analisa Arosemena; David Zurakowski; Ramesh S Ayyala
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.048

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of complications after Ahmed versus Baerveldt implant in glaucoma patients: one year follow-up.

Authors:  Sara Listyani Koentjoro; Widya Artini; Iwan Soebijantoro; Vira Wardhana Istiantoro; Emma Rusmayani; Rini Sulastiwaty; Zeiras Eka Djamal; Arini Safira Nurul Akbar; Muhammad Yoserizal
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Risk Factors for Glaucoma Drainage Device Failure and Complication in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Charles M Medert; Kara M Cavuoto; Elizabeth A Vanner; Alana L Grajewski; Ta C Chang
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 3.  Management of Childhood Glaucoma Following Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Simons; Ingele Casteels; John Grigg; Ingeborg Stalmans; Evelien Vandewalle; Sophie Lemmens
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Can trainees perform Ahmed glaucoma valve surgery as effectively as attendings?

Authors:  Melih Ustaoglu; Hugh Huynh; Sharmenie Esin; Aakriti Garg Shukla; Reza Razeghinejad
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.