| Literature DB >> 29487765 |
Ali S Haider1, Tijani Osumah2, Hawk Cambron3, Suraj Sulhan1, Fariha Murshid4, Steven Vayalumkal5, Richa Thakur1, Umair Khan5, Kennith F Layton6.
Abstract
The two main treatment modalities of acute intracranial aneurysm rupture are endovascular embolization and surgical clipping, each with its own benefits and risks. Endovascular treatment is associated with better outcomes compared to surgical clipping, but is also associated with high recurrence rates. We present the case of a patient with an acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysm, who subsequently underwent partial endovascular coiling acutely, and later underwent flow diversion therapy with the Pipeline Embolization Device. We also review the literature on this topic for further recommendations on treatment options of acute intracranial aneurysm rupture.Entities:
Keywords: aneurysm; endovascular coiling; flow diversion; pipeline embolization device
Year: 2017 PMID: 29487765 PMCID: PMC5820010 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1876
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184