| Literature DB >> 29487270 |
Masaki Fujioka1, Kenji Hayashida2, Hiroto Saijo2.
Abstract
Perineovaginorectal defect usually requires surgical repair; however, direct closure often leads to dehiscence. We present two patients with a congenital perineal skin defect who were successfully treated using a gluteal-fold bilobed perforator flap. This flap facilitates esthetic restoration and a more natural perineovaginorectal appearance, using only a one-stage procedure. This technique may be a favorable option for perineal and genital repair.Entities:
Keywords: Bilobed flap; perforator flap; perineal skin defect; reconstruction
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29487270 PMCID: PMC5853016 DOI: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_29_16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Paediatr Surg ISSN: 0974-5998
Figure 1(a) The bilobed flap designed in the first quarter. (b) The bilobed flap designed in the last quarter. (c) Intraoperative view of the elevated perforator flap. Arrow shows cutaneous perforator vessels
Figure 2(a) Preoperative view of Case 1. A 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm ulcer was noted between the anus and vagina. (b) After debridement, a bilobed flap was elevated from the left gluteal lesion. (c) The large flap was transposed to cover the perineal skin defect, and the small flap was transposed to cover the donor site of the large flap. (d) Six-month postoperative view. The viability of the flap was favorable, and it divided the anus and vagina. (e) Six-month postoperative image showing favorable bowel control
Figure 3(a) Preoperative view of Case 2. A 1.0 cm × 1.5 cm ulcer was noted in the perineal lesion (arrow). (b) The ulcer was excised completely, and a bilobed perforator flap was designed. (c) Intraoperative view of flap transfer. The large flap was transposed to cover the perineal defect, and the small flap was transposed to cover the donor site of the large flap. (d) Three-month postoperative image showing a favorable appearance