Literature DB >> 29486921

[Dihydropyrimidine déhydrogenase (DPD) deficiency screening and securing of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapies: Update and recommendations of the French GPCO-Unicancer and RNPGx networks].

Marie-Anne Loriot1, Joseph Ciccolini2, Fabienne Thomas3, Chantal Barin-Le-Guellec4, Bernard Royer5, Gérard Milano6, Nicolas Picard7, Laurent Becquemont8, Céline Verstuyft8, Céline Narjoz1, Antonin Schmitt9, Christine Bobin-Dubigeon10, Alexandre Harle11, Angelo Paci12, Vianney Poinsignon12, Sylvie Quaranta2, Alexandre Evrard13, Benjamin Hennart14, Franck Broly14, Xavier Fonrose15, Claire Lafay-Chebassier16, Anne-Sophie Wozny17, Fadil Masskouri18, Jean-Christophe Boyer13, Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi19.   

Abstract

Fluoropyrimidines (FU) are still the most prescribed anticancer drugs for the treatment of solid cancers. However, fluoropyrimidines cause severe toxicities in 10 to 40% of patients and toxic deaths in 0.2 to 0.8% of patients, resulting in a real public health problem. The main origin of FU-related toxicities is a deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the rate-limiting enzyme of 5-FU catabolism. DPD deficiency may be identified through pharmacogenetics testing including phenotyping (direct or indirect measurement of enzyme activity) or genotyping (detection of inactivating polymorphisms on the DPYD gene). Approximately 3 to 15% of patients exhibit a partial deficiency and 0.1 to 0.5% a complete DPD deficiency. Currently, there is no regulatory obligation for DPD deficiency screening in patients scheduled to receive a fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Based on the levels of evidence from the literature data and considering current French practices, the Group of Clinical Pharmacology in Oncology (GPCO)-UNICANCER and the French Network of Pharmacogenetics (RNPGx) recommend the following: (1) to screen DPD deficiency before initiating any chemotherapy containing 5-FU or capecitabine; (2) to perform DPD phenotyping by measuring plasma uracil (U) concentrations (possibly associated with dihydrouracil/U ratio), and DPYD genotyping (variants *2A, *13, p.D949V, HapB3); (3) to reduce the initial FU dose (first cycle) according to DPD status, if needed, and further, to consider increasing the dose at subsequent cycles according to treatment tolerance. In France, 17 public laboratories currently undertake routine screening of DPD deficiency.
Copyright © 2018 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-Fluorouracile; 5Fluorouracil; Capecitabine; Capécitabine; DPYD; Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; Dihydropyrimidine déshydrogénase; Dépistage; Fluoropyrimidine; Pharmacogenetics; Pharmacogénétique; Recommandation; Recommendation; Screening; Toxicity; Toxicité

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29486921     DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Cancer        ISSN: 0007-4551            Impact factor:   1.276


  16 in total

1.  Implementing DPYD*2A Genotyping in Clinical Practice: The Quebec, Canada, Experience.

Authors:  Catherine Jolivet; Rami Nassabein; Denis Soulières; Xiaoduan Weng; Carl Amireault; Jean-Pierre Ayoub; Patrice Beauregard; Normand Blais; Christian Carrier; Alexis-Simon Cloutier; Alexandra Desnoyers; Anne-Sophie Lemay; Frédéric Lemay; Rasmy Loungnarath; Jacques Jolivet; François Letendre; Mustapha Tehfé; Charles Vadnais; Daniel Viens; Francine Aubin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-12-23

2.  Pretherapeutic screening for Dihydropyrimidine deshydrogenase deficiency in measuring uracilemia in dialysis patients leads to a high rate of falsely positive results.

Authors:  Clotilde Gaible; Céline Narjoz; Marie-Anne Loriot; Stéphane Roueff; Nicolas Pallet
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  DPYD Genotyping in Patients Who Have Planned Cancer Treatment With Fluoropyrimidines: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2021-08-12

Review 4.  Modern developments in germline pharmacogenomics for oncology prescribing.

Authors:  Natalie M Reizine; Peter H O'Donnell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 286.130

5.  New DPYD variants causing DPD deficiency in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine.

Authors:  Xandra García-González; Bartosz Kaczmarczyk; Judith Abarca-Zabalía; Fabienne Thomas; Pilar García-Alfonso; Luis Robles; Vanessa Pachón; Ángeles Vaz; Sara Salvador-Martín; María Sanjurjo-Sáez; Luis A López-Fernández
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Comparison of a thymine challenge test and endogenous uracil-dihydrouracil levels for assessment of fluoropyrimidine toxicity risk.

Authors:  Kathryn E Burns; Ottiniel Chavani; Soo Hee Jeong; John A Duley; David Porter; Michael Findlay; R Matthew Strother; Nuala A Helsby
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  The Value of Pharmacogenetics to Reduce Drug-Related Toxicity in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Doreen Z Mhandire; Andrew K L Goey
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 8.  Antitumor pharmacotherapy of colorectal cancer in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Fu; Chengheng Liao; Kai Cui; Xiao Liu; Wentong Fang
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  A Novel DPYD Variant Associated With Severe Toxicity of Fluoropyrimidines: Role of Pre-emptive DPYD Genotype Screening.

Authors:  Chi C Tong; Ching W Lam; Ka O Lam; Victor H F Lee; Mai-Yee Luk
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  DPYD and Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy: Mini Review and Case Report.

Authors:  Theodore J Wigle; Elena V Tsvetkova; Stephen A Welch; Richard B Kim
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.