Literature DB >> 29486596

A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference.

Chunmei Li1, Min Chen1, Ben Wan2, Jingying Yu1, Ming Liu2, Wei Zhang3, Jianye Wang2.   

Abstract

Background Although several studies have been reported on evaluating the performance of Gaussian and different non-Gaussian diffusion models on prostate cancer, few studies have been reported on the comparison of different models on differential diagnosis for prostate cancer. Purpose To compare the utility of various metrics derived from monoexponential model (MEM), biexponential model (BEM), stretched-exponential model (SEM) based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer. Material and Methods Thirty-three patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Multi-b value and multi-direction DWIs were performed. In-bore MR-guided biopsy was performed. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure molecular diffusion (ADCslow), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (ADCfast), perfusion fraction (f), water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (α), distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC), non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (MD), and mean kurtosis (MK) values were calculated and compared between cancerous and non-cancerous groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for all parameters and models. Results ADC, ADCslow, DDC, and MD values were significantly lower while MK value was significantly higher in prostate cancer than those of prostatitis and benign prostatic hyperplasia. ADC, ADCslow, DDC, MD, and MK could discriminate between tumor and non-tumorous lesions (area under the curve, 0.856, 0.835, 0.866, 0.918, and 0.937, respectively). MK was superior to ADC in the discrimination of prostate cancer. DKI was superior to MEM in the discrimination of prostate cancer. Conclusions Parameters derived from both Gaussian and non-Gaussian models could characterize prostate cancer. DKI may be advantageous than DWI for detection of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monoexponential model; biexponential model; diffusion kurtosis; prostate cancer; stretched-exponential model

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29486596     DOI: 10.1177/0284185118760961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  6 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion and quantification of diffusion of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiko Ueno; Tsutomu Tamada; Keitaro Sofue; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparison of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Amide Proton Transfer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Huijia Yin; Dongdong Wang; Ruifang Yan; Xingxing Jin; Ying Hu; Zhansheng Zhai; Jinhui Duan; Jian Zhang; Kaiyu Wang; Dongming Han
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  The Histogram Analysis of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Kurtosis Model in the Diagnosis and Grading of Prostate Cancer-A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Chunmei Li; Lu Yu; Yuwei Jiang; Yadong Cui; Ying Liu; Kaining Shi; Huimin Hou; Ming Liu; Wei Zhang; Jintao Zhang; Chen Zhang; Min Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  XGboost Prediction Model Based on 3.0T Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI BiRADS 4 Masses.

Authors:  Wan Tang; Han Zhou; Tianhong Quan; Xiaoyan Chen; Huanian Zhang; Yan Lin; Renhua Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Combining Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Prostate-Specific Antigen to Differentiate Between Malignant and Benign Prostate Lesions.

Authors:  Liying Han; Guanyong He; Yingjie Mei; Qing Yu; Minning Zhao; Fu Luo; Guanxun Cheng; Wen Liang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-04-23

6.  Preoperatively Grading Rectal Cancer with the Combination of Intravoxel Incoherent Motions Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging.

Authors:  Zhijun Geng; Yunfei Zhang; Shaohan Yin; Shanshan Lian; Haoqiang He; Hui Li; Chuanmiao Xie; Yongming Dai
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.161

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.