Literature DB >> 29486296

Abnormal hippocampal theta and gamma hypersynchrony produces network and spike timing disturbances in the Fmr1-KO mouse model of Fragile X syndrome.

Tara Arbab1, Francesco P Battaglia2, Cyriel M A Pennartz3, Conrado A Bosman4.   

Abstract

Neuronal networks can synchronize their activity through excitatory and inhibitory connections, which is conducive to synaptic plasticity. This synchronization is reflected in rhythmic fluctuations of the extracellular field. In the hippocampus, theta and gamma band LFP oscillations are a hallmark of the processing of spatial information and memory. Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is an intellectual disability and the most common genetic cause of autism spectrum disorder (Belmonte and Bourgeron, 2006). Here, we investigated how neuronal network synchronization in the mouse hippocampus is compromised by the Fmr1 mutation that causes FXS (Santos et al., 2014), relating recently observed single-cell level impairments (Arbab et al., 2017) to neuronal network aberrations. We implanted tetrodes in hippocampus of freely moving Fmr1-KO and littermate wildtype (WT) mice (Mientjes et al., 2006), to record spike trains from multiple, isolated neurons as well as LFPs in a spatial exploration paradigm. Compared to wild type mice, Fmr1-KO mice displayed greater power of hippocampal theta oscillations, and higher coherence in the slow gamma band. Additionally, spike trains of Fmr1-KO interneurons show decreased spike-count correlations and they are hypersynchronized with theta and slow gamma oscillations. The hypersynchronization of Fmr1-KO oscillations and spike timing reflects functional deficits in local networks. This network hypersynchronization pathologically decreases the heterogeneity of spike-LFP phase coupling, compromising information processing within the hippocampal circuit. These findings may reflect a pathophysiological mechanism explaining cognitive impairments in FXS and autism, in which there is anomalous processing of social and environmental cues and associated deficits in memory and cognition.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fragile X syndrome; Gamma oscillations; Hippocampus; Neuronal network activity; Spike-field coherence; Theta oscillations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29486296     DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Dis        ISSN: 0969-9961            Impact factor:   5.996


  6 in total

Review 1.  Inhibitory Interneurons Regulate Temporal Precision and Correlations in Cortical Circuits.

Authors:  Jessica A Cardin
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  GSK-3β Disrupts Neuronal Oscillatory Function to Inhibit Learning and Memory in Male Rats.

Authors:  Abdalla M Albeely; Olivia O F Williams; Melissa L Perreault
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  Sex differences in resting EEG power in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Smith; Ernest V Pedapati; Rui Liu; Lauren M Schmitt; Kelli C Dominick; Rebecca C Shaffer; John A Sweeney; Craig A Erickson
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Impaired Reliability and Precision of Spiking in Adults But Not Juveniles in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Deepanjali Dwivedi; Sumantra Chattarji; Upinder S Bhalla
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-12-03

Review 5.  EEG as a translational biomarker and outcome measure in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Aisling Kenny; Damien Wright; Andrew C Stanfield
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 6.  Functional Neurophysiological Biomarkers of Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: A Perspective of Network Hyperexcitability in Disease Progression.

Authors:  Sean Tok; Abdallah Ahnaou; Wilhelmus Drinkenburg
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.160

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.