Literature DB >> 29486216

Interoception sensitivity in the parental brain during the first months of parenting modulates children's somatic symptoms six years later: The role of oxytocin.

Eyal Abraham1, Talma Hendler2, Orna Zagoory-Sharon1, Ruth Feldman3.   

Abstract

Interoception, the perception and interpretation of one's own bodily signals, is a key aspect of human caregiving that impacts infant health and well-being across life. Interoception relies on limbic structures, mainly the amygdala, and the agranular visceromotor cortex, particularly the anterior insula (AI), that integrate with the oxytocin (OT) system to support interoceptive sensitivity. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine whether interoception sensitivity in the parent's brain during the first months of parenting combines with sensitive parenting and OT-system functionality to predict children's somatic symptoms six years later. We followed 45 primary-caregiving first-time mothers and fathers and their infants across the first six years of parenting. In infancy (Time 1), parents' brain response to infant stimuli was imaged, salivary OT measured, and parent-infant interactions coded for parent sensitivity. In preschool (Time 2), parent and child's OT and parent sensitivity were measured again. At six years (Time 3), parents reported on children's somatic symptoms. Greater activation of the parent's AI bilaterally when his/her child was an infant predicted lower child somatic problems at six years. Parent sensitivity partially mediated the links between parental AI activation and child somatic symptoms. In addition, greater parental bilateral amygdala activity predicted higher child OT levels at 3 years and parental OT moderated the relations between preschoolers' OT and later somatic symptoms. Our findings chart two independent cross-generational pathways from interoception sensitivity in the parent's brain and child somatization. The first defines an evolutionary-ancient path including the amygdala and the OT system that support mammalian attention to arousal modulations in response to social cues; the second, via the AI, implicates higher-order interoceptive representations of bodily responses and affective states that underpins human embodiment.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29486216     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Neural Basis of Human Fatherhood: A Unique Biocultural Perspective on Plasticity of Brain and Behavior.

Authors:  Eyal Abraham; Ruth Feldman
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2022-02-05

Review 2.  Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review.

Authors:  Rebecca Brewer; Jennifer Murphy; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  Functions of Interoception: From Energy Regulation to Experience of the Self.

Authors:  Karen S Quigley; Scott Kanoski; Warren M Grill; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Mothers' interoceptive sensibility mediates affective interaction between mother and infant.

Authors:  Ayami Suga; Yosuke Naruto; Venie Viktoria Rondang Maulina; Maki Uraguchi; Yuka Ozaki; Hideki Ohira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.