Literature DB >> 29485956

Proximal Aortic Surgery: Upper "J" or Conventional Sternotomy?

İsmail Oral Hastaoglu1, Hamdi Tokoz1, Ayca Ozgen2, Fuat Bilgen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While minimally invasive procedures are being used in cardiac surgery, experience with minimally invasive proximal aortic surgery has been limited to certain centers.
METHODS: Between January 2010 and March 2015, 54 patients with an upper "J" hemi-sternotomy and 75 patients with a conventional sternotomy due to proximal aortic pathology were included in this study. Forty-five patients from the "J" hemi-sternotomy group were matched with 45 patients from the conventional sternotomy group with respect to age, sex, ejection fraction, diabetes, hypertension, smoking history and operative type. Perioperative variables were in-hospital mortality, surgery for revision, amount of blood loss, requirement for blood transfusion, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aortic cross-clamp and unilateral cerebral protection times, duration of ventilation, and length of intensive care unit (ICU) and total hospital stay.
RESULTS: Patients were between 21-76 years with a mean age of 58.14 ± 11.06 years; 73.3% (n = 66) were male and 26.7% (n = 24) were female. Of all the cases included, 36.7% (n = 33) had isolated ascending aortic replacement, 41.1% (n = 37) had concomitant aortic valve replacement and ascending aortic replacement, and 22.2% (n = 20) had a Bentall procedure. Statistically, the amount of bleeding (P = .026), length of ventilation (P = .001), ICU (P = .001) and total hospital stay (P = .004) in the "J" hemi-sternotomy group were all found to be significantly lower than those in the conventional group.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive techniques like an upper "J" hemi-sternotomy can be safely performed without prolonging the aortic clamp time, and with less blood loss, less ventilatory support, and shorter ICU and total hospital stays when compared to conventional methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29485956     DOI: 10.1532/hsf.1649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Surg Forum        ISSN: 1098-3511            Impact factor:   0.676


  2 in total

1.  Minimally invasive versus conventional surgery of the ascending aorta and root: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tom A Rayner; Sean Harrison; Paul Rival; Dominic E Mahoney; Massimo Caputo; Gianni D Angelini; Jelena Savović; Hunaid A Vohra
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Minimally invasive approach: is this the future of aortic surgery?

Authors:  Paolo Berretta; Michele Galeazzi; Mariano Cefarelli; Jacopo Alfonsi; Veronica De Angelis; Michele Danilo Pierri; Sacha M L Matteucci; Eugenio Alessandroni; Carlo Zingaro; Filippo Capestro; Alessandro D'Alfonso; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-12-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.