Literature DB >> 29485948

Prospective Service Use and Health Care Costs of Medicaid Beneficiaries with Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Mark Olfson1, Tony B Amos2, Carmela Benson2, Jacquelyn McRae2, Steven C Marcus3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the clinical and health economic characteristics of commercially insured adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have been well characterized, little is known about TRD in the Medicaid population.
OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical and health economic characteristics of adult Medicaid beneficiaries with TRD.
METHODS: Retrospective longitudinal cohort analyses were performed with Truven Health MarketScan Medicaid Database (2008-2014), focusing on adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) following an index antidepressant prescription. TRD was operationally defined as starting a third treatment regimen after 2 adequate regimens of antidepressants or augmentation therapy within 12 months of an index antidepressant prescription. Among patients with and without TRD, percentages with inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits (all cause, mental health related, and depression related) were determined. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations between TRD status and use of inpatient, outpatient, and emergency services. Separate analyses were performed for the first and second year after the index antidepressant prescription.
RESULTS: Approximately one quarter (25.9%) of pharmacologically treated adults with MDD met criteria for TRD. In relation to MDD patients without TRD, patients with TRD were proportionately more likely to be older, male, and white. Compared with MDD patients without TRD, patients with TRD were also significantly more likely to receive inpatient care for any cause (31.0% vs. 21.6%; P < 0.001), a mental health-related reason (12.7% vs. 7.6%; P < 0.001), or depression (10.1% vs. 6.1%; P < 0.001) during the first year following their index antidepressant prescription. Over the second follow-up year, patients with TRD continued to be more likely than patients without TRD to receive inpatient care for any reason (26.7% vs. 19.5%; P < 0.001), a mental health-related reason (5.6% vs. 2.7%; P < 0.001), and depression (3.7% vs. 1.7%; P < 0.001). The mean health care costs of patients with TRD were also significantly higher than the costs of patients without TRD during the first year ($18,982 [SD ± $35,276] vs. $11,642 [SD ± $29,203]) and second year ($17,997 [SD ± $34,146] vs. $10,325 [SD ± $28,224]) following the index antidepressant prescription.
CONCLUSIONS: In the U.S. Medicaid program, adults with TRD have substantially and persistently higher health care costs than their counterparts who do not meet criteria for TRD. The service use and health care cost patterns of patients with TRD in the Medicaid program highlight challenges of developing interventions and care coordination strategies to meet their complex clinical needs. DISCLOSURES: This project was sponsored by Janssen Scientific Affairs. Olfson received a grant from Janssen Scientific Affairs through Columbia University Medical Center. Amos and Benson are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs. Marcus was paid by Janssen Scientific Affairs to provide consulting support for this study and reports fees from Sunovion Pharmaceuticals and Alkermes outside of this study. McRae was a fellow affiliated with Janssen Scientific Affairs during the development of this research and manuscript. Study concept and design were contributed by Amos, Olfson, Marcus, Benson, and McRae. Data analysis was performed by all the authors. The manuscript was primarily written by Olfson, along with the other authors, and revised by McRae, Benson, Amos, Marcus, and Olfson. A different data cut from the same database was presented previously at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; May 20-24, 2017; Boston, MA; and the 2017 AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting; June 25-27, 2017; New Orleans, LA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29485948     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.3.226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm


  11 in total

Review 1.  Indirect COVID-19 health effects and potential mitigating interventions: Cost-effectiveness framework.

Authors:  Sigal Maya; James G Kahn; Tracy K Lin; Laurie M Jacobs; Laura A Schmidt; William B Burrough; Rezvaneh Ghasemzadeh; Leyla Mousli; Matthew Allan; Maya Donovan; Erin Barker; Hacsi Horvath; Joanne Spetz; Claire D Brindis; Mohsen Malekinejad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Economic Burden of Treatment-Resistant Depression Among Patients Hospitalized for Major Depressive Disorder in the United States.

Authors:  Jay Lin; Holly Szukis; John J Sheehan; Larry Alphs; Brandy Menges; Melissa Lingohr-Smith; Carmela Benson
Journal:  Psychiatr Res Clin Pract       Date:  2019-10-11

3.  An episode level evaluation of the treatment journey of patients with major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Bingcao Wu; Qian Cai; John J Sheehan; Carmela Benson; Nancy Connolly; Larry Alphs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Burden of treatment-resistant depression in Medicare: A retrospective claims database analysis.

Authors:  Dominic Pilon; Kruti Joshi; John J Sheehan; Miriam L Zichlin; Peter Zuckerman; Patrick Lefebvre; Paul E Greenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  US Integrated Delivery Networks Perspective on Economic Burden of Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dominic Pilon; Holly Szukis; Kruti Joshi; David Singer; John J Sheehan; Jennifer W Wu; Patrick Lefebvre; Paul Greenberg
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2020-03

6.  Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Patients with Treatment-resistant Depression- an Asian Sub-group Analysis from the SUSTAIN-2 Study.

Authors:  Hong Jin Jeon; Po-Chung Ju; Ahmad Hatim Sulaiman; Salina Abdul Aziz; Jong-Woo Paik; Wilson Tan; Daisy Bai; Cheng-Ta Li
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 7.  Clinical research challenges posed by difficult-to-treat depression.

Authors:  A John Rush; Harold A Sackeim; Charles R Conway; Mark T Bunker; Steven D Hollon; Koen Demyttenaere; Allan H Young; Scott T Aaronson; Maxine Dibué; Michael E Thase; R Hamish McAllister-Williams
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Humanistic outcomes in treatment resistant depression: a secondary analysis of the STAR*D study.

Authors:  Allitia DiBernardo; Xiwu Lin; Qiaoyi Zhang; Jim Xiang; Lang Lu; Carol Jamieson; Carmela Benson; Kwan Lee; Robert Bodén; Lena Brandt; Philip Brenner; Johan Reutfors; Gang Li
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Active Commuting and Depression Symptoms in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Adilson Marques; Miguel Peralta; Duarte Henriques-Neto; Diana Frasquilho; Élvio Rubio Gouveira; Diego Gomez-Baya
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Evaluation of population-level pharmacogenetic actionability in Alabama.

Authors:  Brittney H Davis; Kelly Williams; Devin Absher; Bruce Korf; Nita A Limdi
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.