Andrew G Siddall1, Richard D M Stevenson, Philip J F Turner, James L J Bilzon. 1. Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath (Dr Siddall, Dr Stevenson, Mr Turner, Dr Bilzon); Occupational Performance Research Group, University of Chichester, Chichester (Dr Siddall); Occupational Health Services, South Wales Fire & Rescue Service, Cardiff, Wales (Dr Stevenson); Lancashire Fire & Rescue Service, Preston, Lancashire (Mr Turner), England, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine determinants of firefighting simulation test performance. METHODS: Sixty-eight (63 male; 5 female) firefighters completed a firefighting simulation (eg, equipment carry, casualty evacuation) previously validated to test occupational fitness among UK firefighters. Multiple linear regression methods were used to determine physiological and physical attributes that best predicted completion time. RESULTS: Mean (±SD) time taken to complete the simulation was 610 (±79) seconds. The prediction model combining absolute cardiorespiratory capacity (L min) and fat mass explained the greatest variance in performance and elicited the least random error (R = 0.765, R = 0.585, standard error of the estimate [SEE]: ±52 seconds). Higher fitness and lower fat mass were associated with faster performance. CONCLUSIONS: Firefighter simulation test performance is associated with absolute cardiorespiratory fitness and fat mass. Fitter and leaner individuals perform the task more quickly. Work-based interventions should enhance these attributes to promote safe and effective operational performance.
OBJECTIVE: To examine determinants of firefighting simulation test performance. METHODS: Sixty-eight (63 male; 5 female) firefighters completed a firefighting simulation (eg, equipment carry, casualty evacuation) previously validated to test occupational fitness among UK firefighters. Multiple linear regression methods were used to determine physiological and physical attributes that best predicted completion time. RESULTS: Mean (±SD) time taken to complete the simulation was 610 (±79) seconds. The prediction model combining absolute cardiorespiratory capacity (L min) and fat mass explained the greatest variance in performance and elicited the least random error (R = 0.765, R = 0.585, standard error of the estimate [SEE]: ±52 seconds). Higher fitness and lower fat mass were associated with faster performance. CONCLUSIONS: Firefighter simulation test performance is associated with absolute cardiorespiratory fitness and fat mass. Fitter and leaner individuals perform the task more quickly. Work-based interventions should enhance these attributes to promote safe and effective operational performance.
Authors: Ting Zhu; Yuxiang Hu; Jooyeon Hwang; Dan Zhao; Libin Huang; Liang Qiao; Ankui Wei; Xin Xu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-10-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jaron Ras; Andre P Kengne; Denise L Smith; Elpidoforos S Soteriades; Rucia V November; Lloyd Leach Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-21 Impact factor: 4.614