Literature DB >> 29485362

Runners With Patellofemoral Pain Exhibit Greater Peak Patella Cartilage Stress Compared With Pain-Free Runners.

Tzu-Chieh Liao1,2, Joyce H Keyak3, Christopher M Powers1.   

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether recreational runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP) exhibit greater peak patella cartilage stress compared with pain-free runners. A secondary purpose was to determine the kinematic and/or kinetic predictors of peak patella cartilage stress during running. A total of 22 female recreational runners (12 with PFP and 10 pain-free controls) participated in this study. Patella cartilage stress profiles were quantified using subject-specific finite element models simulating the maximum knee flexion angle during the stance phase of running. Input parameters to the finite element model included subject-specific patellofemoral joint geometry, quadriceps muscle forces, and lower-extremity kinematics in the frontal and transverse planes. Tibiofemoral joint kinematics and kinetics were quantified to determine the best predictor of stress using stepwise regression analysis. Compared with the pain-free runners, those with PFP exhibited greater peak hydrostatic pressure (PFP vs control: 21.2 [5.6] MPa vs 16.5 [4.6] MPa) and maximum shear stress (PFP vs control: 11.3 [4.6] MPa vs 8.7 [2.3] MPa). Knee external rotation was the best predictor of peak hydrostatic pressure and peak maximum shear stress (38% and 25% of variances, respectively), followed by the knee extensor moment (21% and 25% of variances, respectively). Runners with PFP exhibit greater peak patella cartilage stress during running compared with pain-free individuals. The combination of knee external rotation and a high knee extensor moment best predicted the elevated peak stress during running.

Entities:  

Keywords:  articular cartilage; finite element analysis; tibiofemoral joint kinematics and kinetics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29485362     DOI: 10.1123/jab.2017-0229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  7 in total

1.  Reversing the Mismatch With Forefoot Striking to Reduce Running Injuries.

Authors:  Irene S Davis; Tony Lin-Wei Chen; Scott C Wearing
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-05-19

Review 2.  Osteoarthritis year in review 2018: mechanics.

Authors:  L E DeFrate; S Y Kim-Wang; Z A Englander; A L McNulty
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Combining advanced computational and imaging techniques as a quantitative tool to estimate patellofemoral joint stress during downhill gait: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Jonathan A Gustafson; John J Elias; G Kelley Fitzgerald; Scott Tashman; Richard E Debski; Shawn Farrokhi
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Towards a Dynamic Model of the Kangaroo Knee for Clinical Insights into Human Knee Pathology and Treatment: Establishing a Static Biomechanical Profile.

Authors:  Manaal Fatima; Corey J Scholes; Emily Zhong; Lawrence Kohan
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-25

5.  Twelve-Week Gait Retraining Reduced Patellofemoral Joint Stress during Running in Male Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Baofeng Wang; Yang Yang; Xini Zhang; Junqing Wang; Liqin Deng; Weijie Fu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Running Injury Paradigms and Their Influence on Footwear Design Features and Runner Assessment Methods: A Focused Review to Advance Evidence-Based Practice for Running Medicine Clinicians.

Authors:  Cristine Agresta; Christina Giacomazzi; Mark Harrast; Jessica Zendler
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-09

7.  Running-Related Biomechanical Risk Factors for Overuse Injuries in Distance Runners: A Systematic Review Considering Injury Specificity and the Potentials for Future Research.

Authors:  Steffen Willwacher; Markus Kurz; Johanna Robbin; Matthias Thelen; Joseph Hamill; Luke Kelly; Patrick Mai
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 11.928

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.