Literature DB >> 29484502

p63 isoforms in triple-negative breast cancer: ΔNp63 associates with the basal phenotype whereas TAp63 associates with androgen receptor, lack of BRCA mutation, PTEN and improved survival.

Philip J Coates1, Rudolf Nenutil2, Jitka Holcakova2, Marta Nekulova2, Jan Podhorec3, Marek Svoboda3, Borivoj Vojtesek4.   

Abstract

The TP63 gene encodes two major protein variants that differ in their N-terminal sequences and have opposing effects. In breast, ΔNp63 is expressed by immature stem/progenitor cells and mature myoepithelial/basal cells and is a characteristic feature of basal-like triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). The expression and potential role of TAp63 in the mammary gland and breast cancers is less clear, partly due to the lack of studies that employ p63 isoform-specific antibodies. We used immunohistochemistry with ΔNp63-specific or TAp63-specific monoclonal antibodies to investigate p63 isoforms in 236 TNBCs. TAp63, but not ΔNp63, was seen in tumour-associated lymphocytes and other stromal cells. Tumour cells showed nuclear staining for ΔNp63 in 17% of TNBCs compared to 7.3% that were positive for TAp63. Whilst most TAp63+ tumours also contained ΔNp63+ cells, the levels of the two isoforms were independent of each other. ΔNp63 associated with metaplastic and medullary cancers, and with a basal phenotype, whereas TAp63 associated with androgen receptor, BRCA1/2 wild-type status and PTEN positivity. Despite the proposed effects of p63 on proliferation, Ki67 did not correlate with either p63 isoform, nor did they associate with p53 mutation status. ΔNp63 showed no association with patient outcomes, whereas TAp63+ patients showed fewer recurrences and improved overall survival. These findings indicate that both major p63 protein isoforms are expressed in TNBCs with different tumour characteristics, indicating distinct functional activities of p63 variants in breast cancer. Analysis of individual p63 isoforms provides additional information into TNBC biology, with TAp63 expression indicating improved prognosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen receptor; BRCA1; BRCA2; PTEN; TAp63; Triple-negative breast cancer; ΔNp63

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29484502     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2324-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  50 in total

1.  [Triple-negative breast cancer: analysis of patients diagnosed and/or treated at the Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute between 2004 and 2009].

Authors:  M Svoboda; J Navrátil; P Fabian; M Palácová; J Gombošová; L Slámová; D Princ; B Syptáková; A Kudláček; O Bílek; P Pospíšil; T Kazda; P Grell; A Poprach; I Selingerová; R Nenutil; J Juráček; R Héžová; O Slabý; R Vyzula
Journal:  Klin Onkol       Date:  2012

2.  A subset of tumor-derived mutant forms of p53 down-regulate p63 and p73 through a direct interaction with the p53 core domain.

Authors:  C Gaiddon; M Lokshin; J Ahn; T Zhang; C Prives
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Expression and regulation of the ΔN and TAp63 isoforms in salivary gland tumorigenesis clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Mitani; Jie Li; Randal S Weber; Scott L Lippman; Elsa R Flores; Carlos Caulin; Adel K El-Naggar
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  Identification and use of biomarkers in treatment strategies for triple-negative breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  ΔNp63α is a common inhibitory target in oncogenic PI3K/Ras/Her2-induced cell motility and tumor metastasis.

Authors:  Linshan Hu; Shan Liang; Hu Chen; Tao Lv; Junfeng Wu; Deshi Chen; Min Wu; Shengnan Sun; Haibo Zhang; Han You; Hongbin Ji; Yujun Zhang; Johann Bergholz; Zhi-Xiong Jim Xiao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  p40 exhibits better specificity than p63 in distinguishing primary skin adnexal carcinomas from cutaneous metastases.

Authors:  Jonathan J Lee; Mark C Mochel; Adriano Piris; Chakib Boussahmain; Meera Mahalingam; Mai P Hoang
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  TAp63 induces senescence and suppresses tumorigenesis in vivo.

Authors:  Xuecui Guo; William M Keyes; Cristian Papazoglu; Johannes Zuber; Wangzhi Li; Scott W Lowe; Hannes Vogel; Alea A Mills
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  The DeltaNp63 proteins are key allies of BRCA1 in the prevention of basal-like breast cancer.

Authors:  Niamh E Buckley; Susan J Conlon; Karin Jirstrom; Elaine W Kay; Nyree T Crawford; Anthony O'Grady; Katherine Sheehan; Simon S Mc Dade; Ching-Wei Wang; Dennis J McCance; Patrick G Johnston; Richard D Kennedy; D Paul Harkin; Paul B Mullan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  p63 controls cell migration and invasion by transcriptional regulation of MTSS1.

Authors:  A Giacobbe; M Compagnone; L Bongiorno-Borbone; A Antonov; E K Markert; J H Zhou; M Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli; G Melino; A Peschiaroli
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  ΔNp63α expression induces loss of cell adhesion in triple-negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Marta Nekulova; Jitka Holcakova; Xiaolian Gu; Vaclav Hrabal; Sotiris Galtsidis; Paulina Orzol; Yajing Liu; Stella Logotheti; Vassilis Zoumpourlis; Karin Nylander; Philip J Coates; Borivoj Vojtesek
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of breast cancer metastasis signaling by miRNAs.

Authors:  Belinda J Petri; Carolyn M Klinge
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  TAp63 and ΔNp63 (p40) in prostate adenocarcinomas: ΔNp63 associates with a basal-like cancer stem cell population but not with metastasis.

Authors:  Michaela Galoczova; Rudolf Nenutil; Zuzana Pokorna; Borivoj Vojtesek; Philip J Coates
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  ΔN63 suppresses the ability of pregnancy-identified mammary epithelial cells (PIMECs) to drive HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Christopher E Eyermann; Jinyu Li; Evguenia M Alexandrova
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 8.469

Review 4.  Perturbing Enhancer Activity in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Feda H Hamdan; Steven A Johnsen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  ∆Np63/p40 correlates with the location and phenotype of basal/mesenchymal cancer stem-like cells in human ER+ and HER2+ breast cancers.

Authors:  Yajing Liu; Marta Nekulova; Rudolf Nenutil; Iva Horakova; M Virginia Appleyard; Karen Murray; Jitka Holcakova; Michaela Galoczova; Philip Quinlan; Lee B Jordan; Colin A Purdie; Borivoj Vojtesek; Alastair M Thompson; Philip J Coates
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2019-12-06

6.  DNA Demethylation Switches Oncogenic ΔNp63 to Tumor Suppressive TAp63 in Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Zuzana Pokorna; Vaclav Hrabal; Vlastimil Tichy; Borivoj Vojtesek; Philip J Coates
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Stat3 Tyrosine 705 and Serine 727 Phosphorylation Associate With Clinicopathological Characteristics and Distinct Tumor Cell Phenotypes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Michaela Stenckova; Rudolf Nenutil; Borivoj Vojtesek; Philip J Coates
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 2.874

8.  TA*p63 and GTAp63 achieve tighter transcriptional regulation in quality control by converting an inhibitory element into an additional transactivation domain.

Authors:  Susanne Pitzius; Christian Osterburg; Jakob Gebel; Georg Tascher; Birgit Schäfer; Huiqing Zhou; Christian Münch; Volker Dötsch
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 8.469

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.