Literature DB >> 29484281

Energy assessment of second generation (2G) ethanol production from wheat straw in Indian scenario.

Archana Mishra1, Akash Kumar1, Sanjoy Ghosh1.   

Abstract

Impact of second-generation ethanol (2G) use in transportation sector mainly depends upon energy efficiency of entire production process. The objective of present study was to determine energy efficiency of a potential lignocellulosic feedstock; wheat straw and its conversion into cellulosic ethanol in Indian scenario. Energy efficiency was determined by calculating Net energy ratio (NER), i.e. ratio of output energy obtained by ethanol and input energy used in ethanol production. Energy consumption and generation at each step is calculated briefly (11,837.35 MJ/ha during Indian dwarf irrigated variety of wheat crop production and 7.1148 MJ/kg straw during ethanol production stage). Total energy consumption is calculated as 8.2988 MJ/kg straw whereas energy generation from ethanol is 15.082 MJ/kg straw; resulting into NER > 1. Major portion of agricultural energy input is contributed by diesel and fertilisers whereas refining process of wheat straw feedstock to ethanol and by-products require mainly in the form of steam and electricity. On an average, 1671.8 kg water free ethanol, 930 kg lignin rich biomass (for combustion), and 561 kg C5-molasses (for fodder) per hectare are produced. Findings of this study, net energy ratio (1.81) and figure of merit (14.8028 MJ/nil kg carbon) proves wheat straw as highest energy efficient lignocellulosic feedstock for the country.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2G ethanol; Agricultural residues; Energy analysis; Lignocellulosic feedstock; Wheat straw

Year:  2018        PMID: 29484281      PMCID: PMC5818360          DOI: 10.1007/s13205-018-1135-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  3 Biotech        ISSN: 2190-5738            Impact factor:   2.406


  6 in total

1.  Enhanced saccharification of biologically pretreated wheat straw for ethanol production.

Authors:  M López-Abelairas; T A Lu-Chau; J M Lema
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.926

2.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels.

Authors:  Jason Hill; Erik Nelson; David Tilman; Stephen Polasky; Douglas Tiffany
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bioethanol production from Lantana camara (red sage): Pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation.

Authors:  Ramesh Chander Kuhad; Rishi Gupta; Yogender Pal Khasa; Ajay Singh
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  An analysis of net energy production and feedstock availability for biobutanol and bioethanol.

Authors:  Jeffrey Swana; Ying Yang; Mohsen Behnam; Robert Thompson
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  Fermentation of biologically pretreated wheat straw for ethanol production: comparison of fermentative microorganisms and process configurations.

Authors:  María López-Abelairas; Thelmo Alejandro Lu-Chau; Juan Manuel Lema
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.926

6.  Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass.

Authors:  M R Schmer; K P Vogel; R B Mitchell; R K Perrin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.