Literature DB >> 29484236

EFFICACY OF THE STRETCH BAND ANKLE TRACTION TECHNIQUE IN THE TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ANKLE SPRAINS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL.

Kathryn Iammarino1, James Marrie1, Mitchell Selhorst1, Linda P Lowes1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ankle injuries account for up to 40% of all sport related injuries. These injuries can result in weeks to months of missed sport or work. The PRICE (Protection, Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation) treatment is standard care for most acute ankle sprains. Recently, early mobilization in adults has been shown to decrease time off from sport or work, and the likelihood of developing chronic instability. To date, no research has been performed assessing the effectiveness of early mobilization in pediatric patients (<18 years). Purpose: There were two objectives of this study: (1) to determine if early ankle joint mobilization using elastic band traction is effective and (2) assess the occurrence of adverse events with this technique in the pediatric population.
METHODS: Patients with an acute ankle sprain of <7 days referred to physical therapy were randomly assigned to receive early mobilization or PRICE. Early mobilization was performed using a stretch band ankle traction technique. Both groups received a standardized rehabilitation program. Pain, edema, ankle strength using hand-held dynamometry, and Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) were measured at both initial evaluation and at discharge. The number of days before return to sport and the number of treatment sessions were also variables of interest.
RESULTS: Forty-one pediatric patients were recruited for participation (mean age 14.6 + 1.9 years). Both treatment groups had clinically significant improvements in pain, edema, strength, and FADI scores. No significant differences in outcomes were noted between treatment groups. Mean number of days for return to sport for the PRICE group was 26.33 + 7.14 and the early mobilization group was 26.63 + 14.82, the difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.607). The number of total visits for the PRICE group of 8.07 + 2.63 and the early mobilization groups of 8.5 + 1.57, was also not statistically significantly different (p = 0.762). There were no reported adverse events with early mobilization.
CONCLUSION: Early mobilization appears to be a safe intervention in pediatric patients with an acute ankle sprain. Early mobilization resulted in similar outcomes when compared to traditional PRICE treatment. A high drop-out rate in both treatment groups was a limitation of this randomized trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle sprain; mobilization; pediatric

Year:  2018        PMID: 29484236      PMCID: PMC5808004     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  27 in total

Review 1.  Clinical inquiries. Heat or ice for acute ankle sprain?

Authors:  Chris Thompson; Gary Kelsberg; Leilani St Anna; Sourav Poddar
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 2.  Effectiveness of exercise therapy and manual mobilisation in ankle sprain and functional instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philip J van der Wees; Anton F Lenssen; Erik J M Hendriks; Derrick J Stomp; Joost Dekker; Rob A de Bie
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2006

3.  Measurement of ankle joint swelling using a figure of 8*.

Authors:  P S Esterson
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Impact loading of the lumbar spine during football blocking.

Authors:  C J Gatt; T M Hosea; R C Palumbo; J P Zawadsky
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  John D Childs; Sara R Piva; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Manual physical therapy and exercise versus supervised home exercise in the management of patients with inversion ankle sprain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Joshua A Cleland; Paul E Mintken; Amy McDevitt; Melanie L Bieniek; Kristin J Carpenter; Katherine Kulp; Julie M Whitman
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 7.  Chronic complaints after ankle sprains: a systematic review on effectiveness of treatments.

Authors:  John M van Ochten; Marienke van Middelkoop; Duncan Meuffels; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Reliability of water volumetry and the figure of eight method on subjects with ankle joint swelling.

Authors:  E J Petersen; S M Irish; C L Lyons; S F Miklaski; J M Bryan; N E Henderson; L N Masullo
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 9.  Management and prevention of acute and chronic lateral ankle instability in athletic patient populations.

Authors:  Brendan J McCriskin; Kenneth L Cameron; Justin D Orr; Brian R Waterman
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

10.  Prevention and treatment of ankle sprain in athletes.

Authors:  Michael D Osborne; Thomas D Rizzo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.