| Literature DB >> 29484097 |
Lingyi Lu1,2, Huiying Lai2, Zhanyan Pan2, Tingting Hu2, Xiaoxiao Hou2, Ke Cao2, Qiang Ju2.
Abstract
Objective: This study was designed to study the clinical and histopathological characteristics of patients with the scarring folliculitis type acne inversa in Chinese population.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese population; acne inversa; clinical and histopathological characteristics; the scarring folliculitis type
Year: 2017 PMID: 29484097 PMCID: PMC5821155 DOI: 10.1080/19381980.2017.1361575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dermatoendocrinol ISSN: 1938-1972
Comparison of the characteristics between scarring folliculitis type of acne inversa and regular type of acne inversa.
| Variables | Scarring folliculitis type (N = 12),100% | Regular type (N = 9), 100% | Overall patients (N = 21)100% | P value (Scarring folliculitis type versus regular type)/ OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hurley stage | ||||
| Stage I | 8(66.67%) | 5(55.56%) | 13(61.90%) | — |
| Stage II | 4(33.33%) | 4(44.44%) | 8(38.10%) | 0.673/- |
| Lesion types | ||||
| Double-ended comodones | 3(25%) | 0(0%) | 3(14.29%) | 0.229/- |
| Papules and nodules | 12(100%) | 8(88.89%) | 20(95.24%) | 0.429/- |
| Epidermal cysts and/or macrocysts | 3(25%) | 0 | 3(14.29%) | 0.229/- |
| Depressed scars | 10(83.33%) | 4(44.44%) | 14(66.67%) | 0.519/- |
| Locations | ||||
| Armpit and/or breast | 6(50%) | 4(44.44%) | 10(47.62%) | 1/- |
| Ears and/or chest and/or back and/or others | 8(66.67%) | 7(77.78%) | 15(71.43%) | 0.659/- |
| Gluteal and/or groin | 9(75%) | 2(22.22%) | 11(52.38%) | 0.03*/10.5(1.36–81.05) |
| Chemicals exposure | 9(75%) | 2(22.22%) | 11(52.38%) | 0.03*/10.5(1.36–81.05) |
| Smokers | 7(58.33%) | 2(22.22%) | 9(42.86%) | 0.184/- |
| Occupational exposure | 5(41.67%) | 0(0%) | 5(23.81%) | 0.045/2.286(1.311–3.984) |
| Mean BMI(kg/m2) | 25.18±3.16 | 23.50±4.23 | 24.46±3.6 | 0.309/- |
| Overweight | 6(50%) | 3(33.33%) | 9(42.86%) | 0.660/- |
| Family history of acne inversa | 2(16.67%) | 3(33.33%) | 5(23.81%) | 0.611/- |
Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, Student's t-test for quantitative variables.†Reference category; *, P<0.05; BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1.A patient with scarring folliculitis type of acne inversa who was smokers and worked in a packing plant. (a) Double comodones on the forehead (black arrows). (b) Double comodones (black arrows) on the neck and an epidermal cyst (red arrow) on the mandibular. (c) Follicular papules(folliculitis) on the back. (d) Hypertrophic scar on the buttock.
Qualitative histopathological changes observed in patients with scarring folliculitis type of acne inversa and controls.
| Histopathological changes | Scarring folliculitis type (N = 8),% | Controls(N = 6),% |
|---|---|---|
| Epidermal hyperpigmentation | 8(100%) | 1(16.67%) |
| Epidermal hyperplasia | 4(50%) | 0(0%) |
| Sebaceous gland disappearance | 6(75%) | 0(0%) |
| Perifollicular inflammation | 2(25%) | 1(16.67%) |
| Destruction of hair follicle and sebaceous gland | 3(37.5%) | 0(0%) |
| Collagen hyperplasia | 4(50%) | 0(0%) |
| Granulomatous inflammation | 1(12.5%) | 0(0%) |
| Micro thrombus | 3(37.5%) | 0(0%) |
| Perivascular inflammation | 6(75%) | 0(0%) |
| Follicular hyperplasia | 2(25%) | 0(0%) |
Figure 2.Histopathological changes in patients with scarring folliculitis type of acne inversa. (a) Epidermal hyperpigmentation and fibrosis surrounding hair follicles. (HE × 200). (b) Granulomatous inflammation. (HE × 100). (c) Epidermal cyst. (HE × 200). (d) Destruction of hair follicle and sebaceous gland and collagen hyperplasia. (HE × 200).
Figure 3.(a) Comparison of surface area of sebaceous glands between patients and controls, the mean surface area of sebaceous glands (below the dotted line) in patients is smaller than controls (8073.36 ± 15798.43 μm versus 302059.08 ± 502813.78 μm, P = 0.024). (b) Surface area of sebaceous glands where the biopsies with no visible sebaceous glands have been omitted, the mean surface area of sebaceous glands (below the dotted line) in patients is lower than controls (21528.97 ± 19790.81 μm versus 302059.08 ± 502813.78 μm, P = 0.03).