| Literature DB >> 29484017 |
Maria Roccia1, Katlein França2, David Castillo2, Georgi Tchernev3,4, Uwe Wollina5, Michael Tirant6, Yan Valle7, Claudio Guarneri8, Massimo Fioranelli9,10, Torello Lotti11.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the twentieth century, there have been attempts at creating artificial hair to treat baldness. Major evolution took place at the end of 1970's when, unfortunately, artificial hair treatments were applied without appropriate medical controls, resulting in sub-standard results from the use of unsuitable materials and technique. The large improper use of this technique in North America from no medical personnel and with dangerous fibres led the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to suspend the procedure in 1983. In Europe, a new trial on artificial hair procedure started at the beginning of 1990's. In 1995 the European Union (UE) recognised the artificial hair implant as a legitimate medical treatment and outlined the rules related to that procedure. In 1996, biocompatible fibres (Biofibre®) produced by Medicap® Italy were approved by the UE Authorities and by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) as medical devices for hair implant. An effective medical protocol was developed during the following years to provide correct guidelines for appropriate treatment, and to reduce possible related complications. Automatic Biofibre® hair implant represents the last achievement in this hair restoration technique with significant advantages for the patients.Entities:
Keywords: alopecia; biofibre; artificial hair implant; hair implant; hair surgery
Year: 2017 PMID: 29484017 PMCID: PMC5816292 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Access Maced J Med Sci ISSN: 1857-9655
Figure 1Biofibre® is available in 13 colours, with different lengths (15, 30 or 45 cm) and in various shapes (straight, wavy, curly and afro)
Figure 2a): Patient with androgenetic alopecia; b): Final results after five implant sessions with 4000 Biofibre® as a whole
Figure 3A 53 years old woman with chronic telogen effluvium (upper left); Final results after three implant sessions with 2000 Biofibre® as a whole (upper right, down)
Figure 4Patient with two frontal scars (upper); Final result after two implant sessions with 1500 Biofibre® as a whole (down)
Figure 5Right implant deepness of Biofibre® performed by automatic machine to allow best retention rate
Figure 6a Reversible knot of Biofibre® after extraction. No remains stay embedded on the scalp, allowing prompt restitution ad integrum of scalp
Figure 7a): clinical features of the patients; b): technique information; c): efficacy and tolerability of implants
Figure 8Within the pseudo-infundibula, a compact keratin layer adheres closely to the fibres. In the middle and deep reticular dermis, the fibres are surrounded by a small amount of focally granulomatous chronic infiltrate. In the deepest dermis and hypodermis, the fibres are surrounded by fibroplasia, and no inflammatory infiltrate is noted. (Courtesy of Dr PA Fanti, Lab of Dermatology Histopathology, University of Bologna, Italy)