| Literature DB >> 29483867 |
Devesh Tewari1, Adrian M Stankiewicz2, Andrei Mocan3,4, Archana N Sah1, Nikolay T Tzvetkov5, Lukasz Huminiecki2, Jarosław O Horbańczuk2, Atanas G Atanasov2,6.
Abstract
Dementia is a clinical syndrome wherein gradual decline of mental and cognitive capabilities of an afflicted person takes place. Dementia is associated with various risk factors and conditions such as insufficient cerebral blood supply, toxin exposure, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative damage, and often coexisting with some neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Huntington's disease (HD), and Parkinson's disease (PD). Although there are well-established (semi-)synthetic drugs currently used for the management of AD and AD-associated dementia, most of them have several adverse effects. Thus, traditional medicine provides various plant-derived lead molecules that may be useful for further medical research. Herein we review the worldwide use of ethnomedicinal plants in dementia treatment. We have explored a number of recognized databases by using keywords and phrases such as "dementia", "Alzheimer's," "traditional medicine," "ethnopharmacology," "ethnobotany," "herbs," "medicinal plants" or other relevant terms, and summarized 90 medicinal plants that are traditionally used to treat dementia. Moreover, we highlight five medicinal plants or plant genera of prime importance and discuss the physiological effects, as well as the mechanism of action of their major bioactive compounds. Furthermore, the link between mitochondrial dysfunction and dementia is also discussed. We conclude that several drugs of plant origin may serve as promising therapeutics for the treatment of dementia, however, pivotal evidence for their therapeutic efficacy in advanced clinical studies is still lacking.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; amyloid fibrils; dementia; ethnopharmacology; herbal drugs; β-amyloid
Year: 2018 PMID: 29483867 PMCID: PMC5816049 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Most common forms of dementia (according to Abbott, 2011).
| AD-related dementia | Aβ plaques, neurofibrillary tangles | Memory deficits, depression, poor judgment or evidence of mental confusion | 50–80 |
| Vascular dementia | Decreased or interrupted blood flow to the brain, hypoperfusion, oxidative stress | Similar to AD, but less affected memory | 20–30 |
| Dementia with Lewy bodies | α-Synuclein aggregates in neurons and glial cells (cortical Lewy bodies) | Similar to AD and less to PD, hallucinations, tremors, impaired attention | <5 |
| Frontotemporal dementia | Accumulation of MAP tau, atrophy of frontal and temporal lobes | Changes in social behavior, difficulties with language | 5–10 |
Figure 1Overview of mechanisms linking mitochondrial activity with dementia: (1) Mitochondria are crucially important for activating apoptosis (Wang and Youle, 2009); (2) Mitochondria regulate calcium signaling pathway (Walsh et al., 2009); (3) Oxidative phosphorylation occurs in electron transport chain of mitochondria; (4) Calcium signaling induces apoptosis (Hajnoczky et al., 2003); (5) Calcium and neuroinflammatory signaling pathways interact with each other (Sama and Norris, 2013); (6) Cell cycle requires calcium signaling (Berridge, 1995); (7) Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is one of the main sources of reactive oxygen species (Dai et al., 2014); (8) Oxidative phosphorylation and reactive oxygen species regulate cell cycle (Antico Arciuch et al., 2012); (9) Oxidative stress and neuroinflammation are highly interconnected processes (Gao et al., 2014); (10) Neuronal apoptosis (LeBlanc, 2005; Favaloro et al., 2012); (11) Impaired calcium signaling (Berridge, 2011; Nimmrich and Eckert, 2013); (12) Changes in cell cycle (Raina et al., 2000; Katsel et al., 2013); (13) Presence of neuroinflammation (Pasqualetti et al., 2015); (14) Increased oxidative stress (Bennett et al., 2009; Kumar and Singh, 2015); (15) Changes in mitochondrial morphology and functions (Spano et al., 2015; Hung et al., 2018).
Approved (semi-)synthetic drugs used for the treatment of dementia.
| Brand name | Namenda® (USA) | Exelon® (USA, Europe) | Aricept® (USA, Europe) |
| Axura® (Europe) | |||
| Ebixa® (Europe) | |||
| Memando® (Ger) | |||
| Chemical structure | |||
| Indications | Moderate-to-severe AD, AD-related dementia | Mild-to-moderate AD, AD-related dementia | Mild-to-moderate AD, early-to-mid AD dementia |
| Mode of action | Non-competitive NMDA-receptor antagonist | Slowly reversible, non-selective AChE and BuChE inhibitor | Reversible, selective AChE inhibitor |
| Side effects ( | Confusion, dizziness, constipation, and headache | Nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, increased frequency of bowel movements | Nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, increased frequency of bowel movements |
| Half-life (Blennow et al., | 60–100 h (long) | 1 h (very short) | 70 h (long) |
| Doses per day (Blennow et al., | One (first week) | Two | One |
| Initial dose (Blennow et al., | 5 mg/day | 3 mg/day (2 × 1.5 mg) | 5 mg/day |
| Recommended clinically efficient dose (Blennow et al., | 20 mg/day | 6–12 mg/day | 10 mg/day |
Figure 2Chemical structure and targeted mechanisms of galantamine (Gal) against AD and dementia. The major biological effects of Gal lead to significant neuroprotection via dual AChE inhibition and allosteric stimulation of nAChRs.
Overview of medicinal plants used to treat dementia worldwide.
| Howes and Houghton, | 492 | 730 | |
| Fatumbi, | 46 | 104 | |
| Stafford et al., | 06 | 06 | |
| Stafford et al., | 13 | 26 | |
| Wolters, | 129 | 414 | |
| Mantle et al., | 1,010 | 1,660 | |
| Ross, | 196 | 318 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 4,670 | 3,140 | |
| Stafford et al., | 139 | 80 | |
| Howes and Houghton, | 242 | 439 | |
| Stafford et al., | 26 | 34 | |
| Stafford et al., | 01 | 01 | |
| Manyam, | 1,370 | 1,990 | |
| Schultes, | 04 | 06 | |
| Nishiyama et al., | 150 | 236 | |
| Stafford et al., | 39 | 78 | |
| González Ayala, | 12 | 55 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 518 | 717 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 1,420 | 3,910 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 1,740 | 3,260 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 163 | 340 | |
| Tabernaemontanus, | 161 | 292 | |
| Schultes, | 28 | 93 | |
| Howes and Houghton, | 189 | 274 | |
| Stafford et al., | 1,060 | 1,970 | |
| de Barradas, | 94 | 154 | |
| Howes and Houghton, | 185 | 294 | |
| Howes and Houghton, | 198 | 245 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 484 | 1,180 | |
| Tabernaemontanus, | 82 | 95 | |
| Tabernaemontanus, | 310 | 765 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 65 | 86 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 71 | 141 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 21 | 30 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 04 | 04 | |
| Stafford et al., | 47 | 97 | |
| Stafford et al., | 20 | 54 | |
| Stafford et al., | 41 | 93 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 678 | 1,310 | |
| Howes and Houghton, | 2,130 | 6,270 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 09 | 16 | |
| Mantle et al., | 366 | 367 | |
| Tabernaemontanus, | 22 | 32 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 155 | 286 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 27 | 55 | |
| Gurib-Fakim, | 14,000 | 17,300 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 2,410 | 4,050 | |
| Howes et al., | 1,130 | 1,710 | |
| Fatumbi, | 01 | 03 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 2,500 | 3,180 | |
| Schweitzer de Palacios, | 287 | 895 | |
| Stafford et al., | 12 | 22 | |
| Müller-Ebeling and Rätsch, | 97 | 262 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 800 | 981 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 133 | 447 | |
| Howes and Houghton, | 227 | 273 | |
| Howes and Houghton, | 389 | 715 | |
| Tabernaemontanus, | 575 | 1,150 | |
| Finkler, | 390 | 1,180 | |
| Lonicerus, | 1,140 | 1,920 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 223 | 537 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 1,480 | 745 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 900 | 3,060 | |
| Fuchs, | 407 | 997 | |
| Fuchs, | 675 | 1,550 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 358 | 978 | |
| Mantle et al., | 189 | 345 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 4,790 | 6,950 | |
| Taylor, | 248 | 515 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 308 | 562 | |
| Mantle et al., | 08 | 11 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 214 | 493 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 768 | 953 | |
| Duke and Ayensu, | 549 | 679 | |
| Adams et al., | 82 | 221 | |
| Price and Price, | 1,140 | 2,440 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 1,140 | 2,440 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 351 | 420 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 103 | 190 | |
| Howes and Houghton, | 1,430 | 2,090 | |
| Sfikas 1980; Tabernaemontanus, | 1,610 | 2,960 | |
| Stafford et al., | 06 | 31 | |
| Tabernaemontanus, | 248 | 647 | |
| Ortiz de Montellano, | 25 | 54 | |
| Misra, | 545 | 938 | |
| Roeder, | 535 | 1,400 | |
| Adsersen et al., | 1,440 | 2,760 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 973 | 1,340 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 1,520 | 2,070 | |
| Perry and Howes, | 994 | 3,010 |
Figure 3Most prominent phytochemical constituents found in Gingko biloba (Gb).
Figure 4Neuroprotective effects of Gingko biloba L.
Figure 5Phytochemical constituents of ginseng.
Figure 6Chemical structures of curcuminoids.
Figure 7Tautomerism of curcumin: (A) Diketo and 1,3-keto-enol equilibrium form of curcumin with its biologically relevant structural units. (B) Hydrogen transfer in the most stable enol form.
Figure 8Neuroprotective effects of curcumin.
Figure 9Chemical structures of the major phytoconstituents of Glycyrrhiza glabra.
Figure 10A simplified representation of the neuroprotective effects of licorice for dementia treatment.
Figure 11Chemical structures of the nootropic drug L-Theanine and its proteinogenic amino acid analogs.