Audrey Hébert1, Marie-Pier Boucher2, Chantal Guimont2, Matthew Weiss1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Centre Mère-Enfant Soleil, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, Québec. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Centre Mère-Enfant Soleil, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, Québec.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A majority of children presenting with sepsis do not receive adequate fluid resuscitation and have a delay in antibiotic administration despite recommendations from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of measuring a complete set of five vital signs in the emergency department (ED) with recognition and treatment of septic children presenting to the ED. METHODS: Records of 218 patients aged 1 month to 17 years treated between February 2011 and December 2011 in a single academic centre with clinical criteria of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock were retrospectively evaluated. The presence or absence of complete vital signs was analyzed in relation to timing of fluid resuscitation, and if antibiotics were given in the first hour of medical evaluation. RESULTS: Seventy-six per cent of children who had all five vital signs measured in the ED received fluid resuscitation in the first hour after medical evaluation as opposed to 61% of those who had an incomplete set of vital signs (P<0.04). Twenty per cent of children who had all five vital signs measured received antibiotics in the first hour as opposed to 9% in children who had fewer vital signs measured (P<0.02). CONCLUSION: In our study population, the measurement of all vital signs in the ED, including blood pressure, was associated with faster administration of antibiotics and improved compliance with existing fluid bolus recommendations, which may have been the result of better recognition of sepsis in children through vital signs measurement.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A majority of children presenting with sepsis do not receive adequate fluid resuscitation and have a delay in antibiotic administration despite recommendations from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of measuring a complete set of five vital signs in the emergency department (ED) with recognition and treatment of septic children presenting to the ED. METHODS: Records of 218 patients aged 1 month to 17 years treated between February 2011 and December 2011 in a single academic centre with clinical criteria of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock were retrospectively evaluated. The presence or absence of complete vital signs was analyzed in relation to timing of fluid resuscitation, and if antibiotics were given in the first hour of medical evaluation. RESULTS: Seventy-six per cent of children who had all five vital signs measured in the ED received fluid resuscitation in the first hour after medical evaluation as opposed to 61% of those who had an incomplete set of vital signs (P<0.04). Twenty per cent of children who had all five vital signs measured received antibiotics in the first hour as opposed to 9% in children who had fewer vital signs measured (P<0.02). CONCLUSION: In our study population, the measurement of all vital signs in the ED, including blood pressure, was associated with faster administration of antibiotics and improved compliance with existing fluid bolus recommendations, which may have been the result of better recognition of sepsis in children through vital signs measurement.
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; R Phillip Dellinger; Sean R Townsend; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; John C Marshall; Julian Bion; Christa Schorr; Antonio Artigas; Graham Ramsay; Richard Beale; Margaret M Parker; Herwig Gerlach; Konrad Reinhart; Eliezer Silva; Maurene Harvey; Susan Regan; Derek C Angus Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Cláudio F Oliveira; Flávio R Nogueira de Sá; Débora S F Oliveira; Adriana F C Gottschald; Juliana D G Moura; Audrey R O Shibata; Eduardo J Troster; Flávio A C Vaz; Joseph A Carcillo Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Jonathan C Craig; Gabrielle J Williams; Mike Jones; Miriam Codarini; Petra Macaskill; Andrew Hayen; Les Irwig; Dominic A Fitzgerald; David Isaacs; Mary McCaskill Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-04-20
Authors: R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven A Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Joe Brierley; Joseph A Carcillo; Karen Choong; Tim Cornell; Allan Decaen; Andreas Deymann; Allan Doctor; Alan Davis; John Duff; Marc-Andre Dugas; Alan Duncan; Barry Evans; Jonathan Feldman; Kathryn Felmet; Gene Fisher; Lorry Frankel; Howard Jeffries; Bruce Greenwald; Juan Gutierrez; Mark Hall; Yong Y Han; James Hanson; Jan Hazelzet; Lynn Hernan; Jane Kiff; Niranjan Kissoon; Alexander Kon; Jose Irazuzta; Jose Irazusta; John Lin; Angie Lorts; Michelle Mariscalco; Renuka Mehta; Simon Nadel; Trung Nguyen; Carol Nicholson; Mark Peters; Regina Okhuysen-Cawley; Tom Poulton; Monica Relves; Agustin Rodriguez; Ranna Rozenfeld; Eduardo Schnitzler; Tom Shanley; Saraswati Kache; Sara Skache; Peter Skippen; Adalberto Torres; Bettina von Dessauer; Jacki Weingarten; Timothy Yeh; Arno Zaritsky; Bonnie Stojadinovic; Jerry Zimmerman; Aaron Zuckerberg Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Matthew Thompson; Richard Mayon-White; Anthony Harnden; Rafael Perera; Diane McLeod; David Mant Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Amanda Ruth; Courtney E McCracken; James D Fortenberry; Matthew Hall; Harold K Simon; Kiran B Hebbar Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Yong Y Han; Joseph A Carcillo; Michelle A Dragotta; Debra M Bills; R Scott Watson; Mark E Westerman; Richard A Orr Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sam T Romaine; Gerri Sefton; Emma Lim; Ruud G Nijman; Jolanta Bernatoniene; Simon Clark; Luregn J Schlapbach; Philip Pallmann; Enitan D Carrol Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 2.692