Literature DB >> 29483614

HLA-DQB1*06 is a risk marker for chlamydia reinfection in African American women.

Kristin M Olson1, Jianming Tang1, LaDraka' Brown1, Christen G Press1, William M Geisler2.   

Abstract

Associations between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) variants and chlamydia-related outcomes have been inconsistent. We previously identified HLA-DQB1*06 as a risk marker for chlamydia reinfection in a cohort of predominately HIV-infected adolescents. As chlamydia reinfection can lead to reproductive complications, validation of this finding in HIV-seronegative women may help reveal the underlying biology. We performed HLA-DQB1 genotyping in HIV-seronegative, chlamydia-infected African American women who were evaluated for reinfection at 3- and 6-month visits after treatment. Of 185 evaluable women for whom HLA-DQB1 genotyping was performed, only HLA-DQB1*06 was associated with chlamydia reinfection (P = 0.009), with no evidence of a dose-response effect for this allele. African American women with HLA-DQB1*06 may warrant more frequent chlamydia screening. More comprehensive genotyping of HLA class II and neighboring genes is needed to establish whether HLA-DQB1*06 is a causal variant for chlamydia reinfection or a surrogate for other causal variants in the major histocompatibility complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29483614      PMCID: PMC6109624          DOI: 10.1038/s41435-018-0014-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Immun        ISSN: 1466-4879            Impact factor:   2.676


INTRODUCTION

Chlamydia is the most prevalent sexually transmitted bacterial infection in the United States.[1] There is a major disparity in chlamydia rates by race, with African Americans having an almost six-fold higher rate than Caucasians. Limited studies suggest that untreated chlamydial infection may persist for a year or longer in up to 50% of chlamydia-infected women.[2] Recommended treatments for chlamydia are highly efficacious,[3] but up to 20% of treated patients may experience reinfection within months of treatment.[4] Even in the absence of symptoms, both persistent chlamydial infection and reinfection may lead to severe sequelae, including pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and tubal factor infertility (TFI).[5] The underlying mechanism through which some women are more susceptible to chlamydia reinfection than others has not been fully elucidated. In gene knockout studies in mice, CD4+ T-helper type 1 responses have been shown to be necessary and sufficient for the clearance of chlamydia infection from the genital tract, while CD8+ T-cells appear to play a lesser role in the development of protective immunity to chlamydia.[6] As such, HLA association studies of chlamydia outcomes have predominately focused on HLA class II genes, although the results have in general been inconsistent.[7-12] In a few of those studies, HLA-DQB1*06 has been implicated as a risk marker for specific chlamydia outcomes.[10-12] In our previous studies of HLA-DQB1 alleles and chlamydia outcomes in a longitudinal cohort of mostly HIV-infected African American adolescents, we found that HLA-DQB1*06 was associated with chlamydia reinfection and possibly PID.[11, 12] The same allele group has also been reported by Kinnunen et al. as a risk marker for chlamydia-related TFI.[10] Because our previous study cohort was a predominately HIV-infected population, it was unknown whether the findings on HLA associations with chlamydia outcomes from that cohort could be generalized to HIV-seronegative African American women, the population with the most reported cases of chlamydia.[1] Therefore, we conducted a follow-up study in a cohort of HIV-seronegative African American women with uncomplicated chlamydia to confirm the association of HLA-DQB1*06 with chlamydia reinfection.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We performed high-resolution HLA-DQB1 genotyping (to 4-digit specificity) using genomic DNA extracted from 185 HIV-seronegative African American women with uncomplicated chlamydia who were evaluated for chlamydia reinfection at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits after treatment as part of a prospective study. Select participant characteristics based on demographical and clinical data collected at baseline (i.e., enrollment) are shown in Table 1. The median age was 22, 51% were asymptomatic, 26% had concomitant bacterial vaginosis, and 51% had prior chlamydia based on self-report and medical record review of laboratory test results. Chlamydia reinfection, defined as a positive Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) at the 3- and/or 6-month follow-up visit, occurred in 38 (20%) participants. There was a trend (P = 0.095) towards a lower chlamydia reinfection rate in participants with prior chlamydia, but no other demographic or clinical characteristics were associated with chlamydia reinfection.
TABLE 1

Baseline Characteristics of Chlamydia-Infected African American Participants (n=185)

CharacteristicReinfection(n=38)n (%)No Reinfection(n=147)n (%)P-valuea
Age, years, median (range)22 (16–32)22 (16–38)0.284b
Number of sexual partners last 3 months, median (range)1.5 (0–5)1 (0–9)0.167b
Hormonal contraceptive use, n (%)20 (52.6)67 (45.6)0.414c
Prior chlamydia, n (%)24 (63.2)70 (47.6)0.095c
Concomitant infections at baseline, n (%)
  Trichomoniasis2 (5.3)7 (4.8)1.000d
  Candidiasis3 (7.9)21 (14.3)0.419d
  Bacterial Vaginosis11 (29.0)37 (25.2)0.636c

Significance set at the α = 0.05 level;

Wilcoxon rank sum test;

Pearson Chi-square test for independence;

Fisher’s exact test.

Of HLA-DQB1 allele groups analyzed at 2-digit specificities, only DQB1*06 was associated with chlamydia reinfection (Table 2), with the odds of reinfection 2.71 times greater in those with HLA-DQB1*06 (95% CI = 1.31 – 5.86, P = 0.009). At least one copy of DQB1*06 was present in 46% (n=86) of the study cohort. The association remained consistent after controlling for prior chlamydia in a multivariable regression model (adjusted P = 0.010). At the 4-digit resolution level, the most common alleles, DQB1*0602 and DQB1*0604, accounted for most of the DQB1*06 association with reinfection (Table 3). At least one copy of either DQB1*0602 or DQB1*0604 was present in 39% (n=72) of the study cohort. These alleles were not statistically significant; however, the analysis was limited by the small sample size at the 4-digit resolution level. Moreover, the finding of an unfavorable chlamydia outcome associated with DQB1*0602 was consistent with our previous finding from our predominately HIV-infected cohort.[11, 12] We did not find a dose-response effect when evaluating for an association of number of HLA-DQB1*06 allele copies with chlamydia reinfection (Table 4).
TABLE 2

Analyses of HLA-DQB1 allele groups (2-digit specificities) and chlamydia reinfection

DQB1AlleleParticipantFrequencya(n=185)n (%)Reinfection(n=38)n (%)NoReinfection(n=147)n (%)OR(95% CI)P-valueb
DQB1*0256 (30%)8 (21%)48 (33%)0.55 (0.22 – 1.24)0.169
DQB1*0372 (39%)12 (32%)60 (41%)0.67 (0.30 – 1.41)0.300
DQB1*0424 (13%)7 (18%)17 (12%)1.73 (0.62 – 4.39)0.267
DQB1*0575 (41%)13 (34%)62 (42%)0.71 (0.33 – 1.48)0.374
DQB1*0686 (46%)25 (66%)61 (42%)2.71 (1.31 – 5.86)0.009

Frequency refers to individuals who had at least one allele;

After Bonferroni correction, threshold significance is set at αadjusted = (0.05/5) = 0.01 level, logistic regression models;

Abbreviations: OR = odds ratio for chlamydia reinfection.

TABLE 3

Analyses of 4-digit alleles in the DQB1*06 group and chlamydia reinfection

Allelic variantsParticipantFrequencya(n=185)n (%)Reinfection(n=38)n (%)NoReinfection(n=147)n (%)OR(95% CI)P-valueb
DQB1*060267 (36%)18 (47%)49 (33%)1.80 (0.87 – 3.71)0.111c
DQB1*060312 (6%)3 (8%)9 (6%)1.31 (0.34 – 5.11)0.714d
DQB1*06049 (5%)4 (11%)5 (3%)3.34 (0.85 – 13.11)0.088d
DQB1*06097 (4%)2 (5%)5 (3%)1.58 (0.29 – 8.47)0.634d
DQB1*0602 and *060472 (39%)20 (53%)52 (35%)2.03 (0.99 – 4.21)0.054c

Frequency refers to individuals who had at least one allele;

After Bonferroni correction, threshold significance set at the αadjusted = (0.05/5) = 0.01 level;

Logistic regression;

Exact logistic regression;

Abbreviations: OR = odds ratio for chlamydia reinfection.

TABLE 4

Analyses of HLA-DQB1 allele copy numbers and chlamydia reinfection

DQB1* AlleleParticipantFrequency(n=185)Reinfection(n=38)No Reinfection(n=147)P-valuea
DQB1*060.066b
  0 copies100 (54%)14 (37%)86 (59%)
  1 copy63 (34%)19 (50%)44 (30%)
  2 copies22 (12%)5 (13%)17 (12%)
DQB1*0602 and *06040.114b
  0 copies113 (61%)18 (47%)95 (65%)
  1 copy55 (30%)16 (42%)39 (27%)
  2 copies17 (9%)4 (11%)13 (9%)

Significance set at the α = 0.05 level;

Cochran-Armitage test for trend

The consistent association of HLA-DQB1*06 with chlamydia reinfection in women regardless of HIV infection status suggests that this allele group could serve as a risk marker for reinfection. Based on known associations with PID and TFI,[10] DQB1*06 could also serve as a risk marker for reproductive complications after chlamydia infection. The implication of this risk association is that the HLA-DQB1*06 allele may impair protective immune responses that influence susceptibility to chlamydial infection and/or the ability to clear infection. HLA-DQB1*06 allele variants and/or associated haplotypes have been found to be associated with autoimmune diseases (multiple sclerosis and pemphigoid) and other infections (HIV and streptococcal infections).[13] One of most widely reported is the HLA-DRB1*1501-DQB1*0602 haplotype association with multiple sclerosis. The next step in our investigation of immunogenetic determinants of CT reinfection is to comprehensively sequence the MHC region in our study cohort in order to assess for haplotype associations and to evaluate variants that are in linkage disequilibrium with the HLA-DQB1*06 allele. Despite a limited sample size, this candidate gene approach was expected to be informative based our previously published results of an association between HLA-DQB1*06 and chlamydia reinfection and based on inclusion of a study population with similar HLA-DQB1*06 frequency and chlamydia reinfection rates.[12] An additional limitation is that our study focused on African Americans, which reflects the population routinely evaluated at our study site, and did not evaluate haplotypes. It remains to be seen if the risk conferred by DQB1*06 applies to other races/ethnicities. Nonetheless, a more comprehensive analysis of genes and single nucleotide polymorphisms in the MHC class II region should help with fine-mapping efforts and will facilitate a haplotype analysis. The potential clinical translation of our study findings is that African American women with HLA-DQB1*06 may need more frequent chlamydia screening to detect initial chlamydia and reinfection after treatment in order to facilitate timely treatment and prevention of reproductive complications. Conversely, analyses of C. trachomatis epitopes restricted by non-DQB1*06 alleles could identify correlates of immune protection and advance chlamydia vaccine development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study cohort and clinical procedures

Women ≥16 years of age presenting to the Jefferson County Department of Health Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic in Birmingham, Alabama for treatment of a recent positive screening C. trachomatis NAAT were enrolled in a chlamydia immunogenetics study after providing written informed consent. Those who were pregnant, had a prior hysterectomy, were co-infected with HIV, syphilis, or gonorrhea, or had received antibiotics with anti-chlamydial activity in the prior 30 days were excluded. At enrollment, participants were interviewed regarding their demographics, symptoms, sexual history, and hormonal contraception use, and provided blood for genomic DNA. A pelvic examination was performed to obtain a vaginal swab specimen for wet mount testing to diagnose trichomoniasis, bacterial vaginosis, and candidiasis and an endocervical swab specimen for chlamydia and gonorrhea testing by NAAT (Aptima Combo 2 [AC2]; Hologic, Marlborough, MA) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Participants received azithromycin 1g orally for chlamydia treatment and then returned for 3- and 6-month follow-up visits for repeat chlamydia testing by NAAT (AC2) to evaluate for chlamydia reinfection. Our analyses focused on women with confirmed chlamydia at enrollment. Women were classified as having chlamydia reinfection if they had a positive NAAT result for C. trachomatis at the 3- and/or 6-month follow-up visit, as well as for any positive C. trachomatis NAAT result during any non-study visit within the 6-month study period (and at least 28 days since treatment). The study was approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Review Board and JCDH.

HLA genotyping

Using genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood (Gentra Puregen Kit, Qiagen Inc., Germantown, MD), we performed high-resolution HLA-DQB1 genotyping. Briefly, the HLA-DQB1 locus was amplified by gene-specific primers using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), then resolved by Sanger sequencing (Olerup, Inc., West Chester, PA) designed for capillary electrophoresis. Alleles were assigned using the ABI DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Individual alleles were resolved to 4-digit specificities against a recent HLA database (Assign SBT v4.7, Olerup Inc., West Chester, PA). Data analyses evaluated allele groups (i.e., 2-digit specificity) and 4-digit alleles corresponding to distinct protein sequences.

Statistical Analysis

Analyses of baseline participant characteristics and chlamydia reinfection were performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum, Pearson’s chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate. Analyses of chlamydia reinfection by HLA allele frequency were performed using logistic regression or exact logistic regression as appropriate. Any participant characteristics or HLA alleles associated with chlamydia reinfection on univariate analyses with a nominal P-value <0.1 were further evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model. Analyses of chlamydia reinfection by HLA allele copy frequency were performed using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. Statistical significance was set at the α = 0.05 level and a Bonferroni correction adjusted α level was used as appropriate. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
  11 in total

1.  Human leukocyte antigen class II DQ alleles associated with Chlamydia trachomatis tubal infertility.

Authors:  C R Cohen; S S Sinei; E A Bukusi; J J Bwayo; K K Holmes; R C Brunham
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Duration of untreated, uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection and factors associated with chlamydia resolution: a review of human studies.

Authors:  William M Geisler
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 3.  Risk of sequelae after Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in women.

Authors:  Catherine L Haggerty; Sami L Gottlieb; Brandie D Taylor; Nicola Low; Fujie Xu; Roberta B Ness
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Azithromycin versus Doxycycline for Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection.

Authors:  William M Geisler; Apurva Uniyal; Jeannette Y Lee; Shelly Y Lensing; Shacondra Johnson; Raymond C W Perry; Carmel M Kadrnka; Peter R Kerndt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Epidemiological and genetic correlates of incident Chlamydia trachomatis infection in North American adolescents.

Authors:  William M Geisler; Jianming Tang; Chengbin Wang; Craig M Wilson; Richard A Kaslow
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Human leukocyte antigen and cytokine gene variants as predictors of recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in high-risk adolescents.

Authors:  Chengbin Wang; Jianming Tang; William M Geisler; Peggy A Crowley-Nowick; Craig M Wilson; Richard A Kaslow
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Gene knockout mice establish a primary protective role for major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted responses in Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection.

Authors:  R P Morrison; K Feilzer; D B Tumas
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Associations among human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II DQ variants, bacterial sexually transmitted diseases, endometritis, and fertility among women with clinical pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Roberta B Ness; Robert C Brunham; Caixia Shen; Debra C Bass
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Immunogenetic correlates for Chlamydia trachomatis-associated tubal infertility.

Authors:  Craig R Cohen; Joseph Gichui; Rachel Rukaria; Samuel S Sinei; Lakshmi K Gaur; Robert C Brunham
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  HLA DQ alleles and interleukin-10 polymorphism associated with Chlamydia trachomatis-related tubal factor infertility: a case-control study.

Authors:  A H Kinnunen; H-M Surcel; M Lehtinen; J Karhukorpi; A Tiitinen; M Halttunen; A Bloigu; R P Morrison; R Karttunen; J Paavonen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  6 in total

1.  Semen quality is affected by HLA class I alleles together with sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  P I Marques; J C Gonçalves; C Monteiro; B Cavadas; L Nagirnaja; N Barros; A Barros; F Carvalho; A M Lopes; S Seixas
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.842

2.  A Class II-Restricted CD8γ13 T-Cell Clone Protects During Chlamydia muridarum Genital Tract Infection.

Authors:  Raymond M Johnson; Norma Olivares-Strank; Gang Peng
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Predicting the Probability of Chlamydia Reinfection in African American Women Using Immunologic and Genetic Determinants in a Bayesian Model.

Authors:  Kristin M Olson; William M Geisler; Rakesh K Bakshi; Kanupriya Gupta; Hemant K Tiwari
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 4.  Urogenital chlamydia trachomatis treatment failure with azithromycin: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Farnaz Mohammadzadeh; Mahrokh Dolatian; Masoumeh Jorjani; Maryam Afrakhteh; Hamid Alavi Majd; Fatemeh Abdi; Reza Pakzad
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-09-22

5.  Identifying HLA DRB1-DQB1 alleles associated with Chlamydia trachomatis infection and in silico prediction of potentially-related peptides.

Authors:  Leidy Pedraza; Milena Camargo; Darwin A Moreno-Pérez; Ricardo Sánchez; Luisa Del Río-Ospina; Indira M Báez-Murcia; Manuel E Patarroyo; Manuel A Patarroyo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  High rates of persistent and recurrent chlamydia in pregnant women after treatment with azithromycin.

Authors:  Jodie Dionne-Odom; Akila Subramaniam; Kristal J Aaron; William M Geisler; Alan T N Tita; Jeanne Marrazzo
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2020-08-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.