Literature DB >> 29483585

The use of classification tree analysis to assess the influence of surgical timing on neurological recovery following severe cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.

Yann Facchinello1,2, Andréane Richard-Denis2,3, Marie Beauséjour1,4, Cynthia Thompson2, Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong5,6,7.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data.
OBJECTIVES: Assess the influence of surgical timing on neurological recovery using classification tree analysis in patients sustaining cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.
SETTING: Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montreal
METHODS: 42 patients sustaining cervical SCI were followed for at least 6 months post injury. Neurological status was assessed from the American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (AIS) and neurological level of injury (NLI) at admission and at follow-up. Age, surgical timing, AIS grade at admission and energy of injury were the four input parameters. Neurological recovery was quantified by the occurrence of improvement by at least one AIS grade, at least 2 AIS grades and at least 2 NLI.
RESULTS: Proportion of patients that improved at least one ASIA grade was higher in the group that received early surgery (75 vs. 41 %). The proportion of patients that improved two AIS grades was also higher in the group that received early surgery (67 vs. 38 %). Finally, 30 % of the patients that received early decompression improved two NLI as compared with 0% in the other group. Early surgery was also associated with a non-statistically significant improvement in functional recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Neurological recovery of patients sustaining cervical traumatic spinal cord injury can be improved by early decompression surgery performed within 19 h post trauma. SPONSORSHIP: U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command, Rick Hansen Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29483585     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-018-0073-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  28 in total

1.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011).

Authors:  Steven C Kirshblum; Stephen P Burns; Fin Biering-Sorensen; William Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei Krassioukov; M J Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Waring
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  The therapeutic window for spinal cord decompression in a rat spinal cord injury model.

Authors:  Christopher B Shields; Y Ping Zhang; Lisa B E Shields; Yingchun Han; Darlene A Burke; Norman W Mayer
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-10

Review 3.  Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures.

Authors:  J D Steeves; D Lammertse; A Curt; J W Fawcett; M H Tuszynski; J F Ditunno; P H Ellaway; M G Fehlings; J D Guest; N Kleitman; P F Bartlett; A R Blight; V Dietz; B H Dobkin; R Grossman; D Short; M Nakamura; W P Coleman; M Gaviria; A Privat
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Early Decompression (< 8 h) after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Improves Functional Outcome as Assessed by Spinal Cord Independence Measure after One Year.

Authors:  Lukas Grassner; Christof Wutte; Barbara Klein; Orpheus Mach; Silvie Riesner; Stephanie Panzer; Matthias Vogel; Volker Bühren; Martin Strowitzki; Jan Vastmans; Doris Maier
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Establishment of a canine spinal cord injury model induced by epidural balloon compression.

Authors:  Ji Hey Lim; Chang Su Jung; Ye Eun Byeon; Wan Hee Kim; Jung Hee Yoon; Kyung Sun Kang; Oh Kyeong Kweon
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.672

6.  Prognostic factor analysis after surgical decompression and stabilization for cervical spinal-cord injury.

Authors:  Jin Hoon Park; Jeoung Hee Kim; Sung Woo Roh; Seung Chul Rhim; Sang Ryong Jeon
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Distribution-based estimates of clinically significant changes in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury motor and sensory scores.

Authors:  G Scivoletto; F Tamburella; L Laurenza; M Molinari
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.874

8.  Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS).

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Alexander Vaccaro; Jefferson R Wilson; Anoushka Singh; David W Cadotte; James S Harrop; Bizhan Aarabi; Christopher Shaffrey; Marcel Dvorak; Charles Fisher; Paul Arnold; Eric M Massicotte; Stephen Lewis; Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies of early decompression in acute spinal cord injury: a battle of time and pressure.

Authors:  Peter E Batchelor; Taryn E Wills; Peta Skeers; Camila R Battistuzzo; Malcolm R Macleod; David W Howells; Emily S Sena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs.

Authors:  Ian Shrier; Robert W Platt
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.