Literature DB >> 29483568

Skew in ovarian activation depends on domicile size in phyllode-glueing thrips.

J D J Gilbert1,2, A Wells3, S J Simpson4.   

Abstract

Costs and benefits of group living are a fundamental topic in behavioural ecology. Resource availability affects individuals' breeding prospects alone and in groups, as well as how reproduction is distributed within groups ("reproductive skew"). Here, in facultatively social thrips, we provide correlational evidence that breeding resources are associated with (1) whether solitary or social living is favoured, and (2) the degree of ovarian skew. Dunatothrips aneurae (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripidae) cooperatively build silk "domiciles" on Australian Acacias, feeding exclusively from internal phyllode surfaces. Per capita productivity scaled differently with group size depending on domicile volume - females in small domiciles did better alone than in groups, whereas in large domiciles single and group-nesting females did equally well. Ovarian dissections revealed that in small domiciles some females were nonreproductive, indicating ovarian (i.e. reproductive) skew. Skew increased as domicile size decreased and group size increased. Breeders had smaller oocyte volume in smaller domiciles, especially those containing nonreproductives. These findings suggest group formation and reproductive skew in D. aneurae may be influenced by reproductive competition for breeding resources. Nonreproductive females in small domiciles may be reproductively suppressed, subfertile, or accumulating resources to reproduce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29483568      PMCID: PMC5832150          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21635-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  15 in total

1.  Reproductive division of labour coevolves with gall size in Australian thrips with soldiers.

Authors:  T E Wills; T W Chapman; B D Kranz; M P Schwarz
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2001-12

Review 2.  The evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperative breeders.

Authors:  W D Koenig; F A Pitelka; W J Carmen; R L Mumme; M T Stanback
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.875

3.  Reduced egg investment can conceal helper effects in cooperatively breeding birds.

Authors:  A F Russell; N E Langmore; A Cockburn; L B Astheimer; R M Kilner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Reproductive skew, concessions and limited control.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies.

Authors:  L Keller; H K Reeve
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Stress and the suppression of subordinate reproduction in cooperatively breeding meerkats.

Authors:  Andrew J Young; Anne A Carlson; Steven L Monfort; Andrew F Russell; Nigel C Bennett; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Better off alone! Reproductive competition and ecological constraints determine sociality in the African striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio).

Authors:  Ivana Schoepf; Carsten Schradin
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Ecological constraints and benefits of philopatry promote group-living in a social but non-cooperatively breeding fish.

Authors:  Marian Y L Wong
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Thrips domiciles protect larvae from desiccation in an arid environment.

Authors:  James D J Gilbert
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Using social parasitism to test reproductive skew models in a primitively eusocial wasp.

Authors:  Jonathan P Green; Michael A Cant; Jeremy Field
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.